Altered spinal motion in low back pain associated with lumbar strain and spondylosis.

Joseph S Cheng, Christopher B Carr, Cyrus Wong, Adrija Sharma, Mohamed R Mahfouz, Richard D Komistek
{"title":"Altered spinal motion in low back pain associated with lumbar strain and spondylosis.","authors":"Joseph S Cheng,&nbsp;Christopher B Carr,&nbsp;Cyrus Wong,&nbsp;Adrija Sharma,&nbsp;Mohamed R Mahfouz,&nbsp;Richard D Komistek","doi":"10.1055/s-0033-1341640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study Design We present a patient-specific computer model created to translate two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopic motion data into three-dimensional (3D) in vivo biomechanical motion data. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the in vivo biomechanical differences in patients with and without acute low back pain. Current dynamic imaging of the lumbar spine consists of flexion-extension static radiographs, which lack sensitivity to out-of-plane motion and provide incomplete information on the overall spinal motion. Using a novel technique, in-plane and coupled out-of-plane rotational motions are quantified in the lumbar spine. Methods A total of 30 participants-10 healthy asymptomatic subjects, 10 patients with low back pain without spondylosis radiologically, and 10 patients with low back pain with radiological spondylosis-underwent dynamic fluoroscopy with a 3D-to-2D image registration technique to create a 3D, patient-specific bone model to analyze in vivo kinematics using the maximal absolute rotational magnitude and the path of rotation. Results Average overall in-plane rotations (L1-L5) in patients with low back pain were less than those asymptomatic, with the dominant loss of motion during extension. Those with low back pain also had significantly greater out-of-plane rotations, with 5.5 degrees (without spondylosis) and 7.1 degrees (with spondylosis) more out-of-plane rotational motion per level compared with asymptomatic subjects. Conclusions Subjects with low back pain exhibited greater out-of-plane intersegmental motion in their lumbar spine than healthy asymptomatic subjects. Conventional flexion-extension radiographs are inadequate for evaluating motion patterns of lumbar strain, and assessment of 3D in vivo spinal motion may elucidate the association of abnormal vertebral motions and clinically significant low back pain. </p>","PeriodicalId":89675,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0033-1341640","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1341640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Study Design We present a patient-specific computer model created to translate two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopic motion data into three-dimensional (3D) in vivo biomechanical motion data. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the in vivo biomechanical differences in patients with and without acute low back pain. Current dynamic imaging of the lumbar spine consists of flexion-extension static radiographs, which lack sensitivity to out-of-plane motion and provide incomplete information on the overall spinal motion. Using a novel technique, in-plane and coupled out-of-plane rotational motions are quantified in the lumbar spine. Methods A total of 30 participants-10 healthy asymptomatic subjects, 10 patients with low back pain without spondylosis radiologically, and 10 patients with low back pain with radiological spondylosis-underwent dynamic fluoroscopy with a 3D-to-2D image registration technique to create a 3D, patient-specific bone model to analyze in vivo kinematics using the maximal absolute rotational magnitude and the path of rotation. Results Average overall in-plane rotations (L1-L5) in patients with low back pain were less than those asymptomatic, with the dominant loss of motion during extension. Those with low back pain also had significantly greater out-of-plane rotations, with 5.5 degrees (without spondylosis) and 7.1 degrees (with spondylosis) more out-of-plane rotational motion per level compared with asymptomatic subjects. Conclusions Subjects with low back pain exhibited greater out-of-plane intersegmental motion in their lumbar spine than healthy asymptomatic subjects. Conventional flexion-extension radiographs are inadequate for evaluating motion patterns of lumbar strain, and assessment of 3D in vivo spinal motion may elucidate the association of abnormal vertebral motions and clinically significant low back pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎劳损和颈椎病相关的腰痛患者脊柱运动改变。
研究设计我们提出了一种针对患者的计算机模型,用于将二维(2D)透视运动数据转换为三维(3D)体内生物力学运动数据。目的研究急性腰痛患者和非急性腰痛患者体内生物力学的差异。目前腰椎的动态成像包括屈伸静态x线片,缺乏对平面外运动的敏感性,并且提供的脊柱整体运动信息不完整。使用一种新颖的技术,在腰椎的平面内和耦合的平面外旋转运动被量化。方法共30名参与者-10名无症状健康受试者,10名放射学上无颈椎病的腰痛患者和10名放射学上有颈椎病的腰痛患者-采用3D- 2d图像配准技术进行动态透视,创建3D患者特异性骨模型,使用最大绝对旋转幅度和旋转路径分析体内运动学。结果腰痛患者的平均整体平面内旋转(L1-L5)小于无症状患者,主要是伸展时的运动丧失。与无症状的受试者相比,腰痛患者也有更大的平面外旋转,每水平有5.5度(无颈椎病)和7.1度(有颈椎病)的平面外旋转。结论腰痛患者腰椎的节段间运动明显大于无症状的健康患者。传统的屈伸x线片不足以评估腰椎劳损的运动模式,而对体内三维脊柱运动的评估可以阐明异常椎体运动与临床显著腰痛的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to prove the value proposition of spine surgery. Administrative database studies: goldmine or goose chase? Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes. Electrical stimulation to enhance spinal fusion: a systematic review. Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in the asymptomatic pediatric population: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1