Sociodemographic Characteristics, Distance to the Clinic, and Breast Cancer Screening Results.

Seijeoung Kim, Beverly Chukwudozie, Elizabeth Calhoun
{"title":"Sociodemographic Characteristics, Distance to the Clinic, and Breast Cancer Screening Results.","authors":"Seijeoung Kim,&nbsp;Beverly Chukwudozie,&nbsp;Elizabeth Calhoun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely detection and follow-up of abnormal cellular changes can aid in early diagnosis of breast cancer, thus leading to better treatment outcomes. However, despite substantial breast cancer screening initiatives, the proportion of female breast cancer cases diagnosed at late stages remains high. Distance to screening clinics may affect access to care, particularly for women living in impoverished areas with limited means of reliable transportation. Utilizing breast cancer screening data collected by the Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Program between 1996 and 2010, we examined the effect of travel distance to the clinic from which women received breast cancer screening tests on stage of diagnosis. The proportion of abnormal mammograms in White women (1.6%) was higher than in Black women (1.1%) or Hispanic women (0.5%). The average distance traveled to a clinic was also farthest among White women (6.7 mi) than for Hispanic (5.3 mi) or Black women (4.4 mi). Distance to a clinic was significantly associated with increased odds of having abnormal results. When distance to clinic was controlled for, the observed disparity in odds of having an abnormal mammogram between White and Black women was no longer statistically significant. Individual and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with distance to clinic, but were not associated with increased odds of having an abnormal mammogram, controlling for distance to the clinic. Findings showed that individual and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics are directly and indirectly associated with abnormal mammogram results, and that distance to a clinic may mediate, in part, the effects of individual characteristics and neighborhood disadvantage on the probability of having an abnormal mammogram.</p>","PeriodicalId":15847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898539/pdf/nihms536673.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Timely detection and follow-up of abnormal cellular changes can aid in early diagnosis of breast cancer, thus leading to better treatment outcomes. However, despite substantial breast cancer screening initiatives, the proportion of female breast cancer cases diagnosed at late stages remains high. Distance to screening clinics may affect access to care, particularly for women living in impoverished areas with limited means of reliable transportation. Utilizing breast cancer screening data collected by the Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Program between 1996 and 2010, we examined the effect of travel distance to the clinic from which women received breast cancer screening tests on stage of diagnosis. The proportion of abnormal mammograms in White women (1.6%) was higher than in Black women (1.1%) or Hispanic women (0.5%). The average distance traveled to a clinic was also farthest among White women (6.7 mi) than for Hispanic (5.3 mi) or Black women (4.4 mi). Distance to a clinic was significantly associated with increased odds of having abnormal results. When distance to clinic was controlled for, the observed disparity in odds of having an abnormal mammogram between White and Black women was no longer statistically significant. Individual and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics were significantly associated with distance to clinic, but were not associated with increased odds of having an abnormal mammogram, controlling for distance to the clinic. Findings showed that individual and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics are directly and indirectly associated with abnormal mammogram results, and that distance to a clinic may mediate, in part, the effects of individual characteristics and neighborhood disadvantage on the probability of having an abnormal mammogram.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会人口学特征、到诊所的距离和乳腺癌筛查结果。
及时发现和随访异常细胞变化有助于乳腺癌的早期诊断,从而获得更好的治疗效果。然而,尽管采取了大量的乳腺癌筛查措施,但晚期确诊的女性乳腺癌病例比例仍然很高。与筛查诊所的距离可能会影响获得护理的机会,特别是对于生活在贫困地区、可靠交通工具有限的妇女。利用伊利诺伊州乳腺癌和子宫颈癌项目在1996年至2010年间收集的乳腺癌筛查数据,我们研究了到接受乳腺癌筛查测试的诊所的距离对诊断阶段的影响。白人女性乳房x线检查异常的比例(1.6%)高于黑人女性(1.1%)或西班牙裔女性(0.5%)。白人妇女到诊所的平均距离(6.7英里)也比西班牙裔妇女(5.3英里)或黑人妇女(4.4英里)最远。到诊所的距离与出现异常结果的几率显著增加相关。当与诊所的距离被控制后,观察到的白人和黑人女性乳房x光检查异常几率的差异不再具有统计学意义。个人和社区社会人口学特征与到诊所的距离显著相关,但与乳房x光检查异常的几率增加无关,控制了到诊所的距离。研究结果表明,个体和社区的社会人口学特征与乳房x光检查结果异常直接或间接相关,而距离诊所的距离可能在一定程度上调解个体特征和社区不利因素对乳房x光检查异常概率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From a Place of Love: The Experiences of Birthing in a Black-Owned Culturally-Centered Community Birth Center. Motherhood Together: Effects of an Adapted Prenatal Curriculum on Mother and Infant Outcomes. Can Community Gardens with Workshops Increase Gardening Behavior? A Navajo Wellness Collaboration. Knowledge, Motivations and Concerns about Participation in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in Puerto Rico. Sex Differences in Risk Factors for Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer among Puerto Rican Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1