A clinical pharmacologic perspective on the detection and assessment of adverse drug reactions.

C A Naranjo
{"title":"A clinical pharmacologic perspective on the detection and assessment of adverse drug reactions.","authors":"C A Naranjo","doi":"10.1177/009286158602000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of a new drug includes the assessment of its pharmacologic effects, benefits (efficacy), and risks (safety). Most recent drug discontinuations in the United States and the United Kingdom have been associated with problems of safety. The assessment of clinical drug safety is difficult. Those assessing drug safety are confronted with the need to make causality assessment judgments of drug-related events. Several procedures for assessing causality of adverse reactions have been proposed; however, none of them is completely satisfactory. Global introspection (the unaided judgment based on knowledge and experience) and the currently available standardized decision aids (questionnaires or algorithms) have serious limitations that hamper their use. There is a need for better procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51023,"journal":{"name":"Drug Information Journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"387-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/009286158602000403","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Information Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/009286158602000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The study of a new drug includes the assessment of its pharmacologic effects, benefits (efficacy), and risks (safety). Most recent drug discontinuations in the United States and the United Kingdom have been associated with problems of safety. The assessment of clinical drug safety is difficult. Those assessing drug safety are confronted with the need to make causality assessment judgments of drug-related events. Several procedures for assessing causality of adverse reactions have been proposed; however, none of them is completely satisfactory. Global introspection (the unaided judgment based on knowledge and experience) and the currently available standardized decision aids (questionnaires or algorithms) have serious limitations that hamper their use. There is a need for better procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从临床药理学角度探讨药物不良反应的检测与评估。
新药的研究包括对其药理作用、益处(疗效)和风险(安全性)的评估。在美国和英国,最近的药物停药都与安全问题有关。临床药物安全性评价是一个难点。药品安全评价面临着对药品相关事件进行因果关系评价判断的需要。已经提出了几种评估不良反应因果关系的程序;然而,没有一个是完全令人满意的。全局自省(基于知识和经验的独立判断)和目前可用的标准化决策辅助工具(问卷调查或算法)具有严重的局限性,阻碍了它们的使用。有必要制定更好的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Information Journal
Drug Information Journal 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data. A Patient Focused Solution for Enrolling Clinical Trials in Rare and Selective Cancer Indications: A Landscape of Haystacks and Needles. Testing in a Prespecified Subgroup and the Intent-to-Treat Population. The Correction of Product Information in Drug References and Medical Textbooks Evaluation of Data Entry Errors and Data Changes to an Electronic Data Capture Clinical Trial Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1