Who will Benefit from a Wide-Scale Introduction of Vaginal Microbicides in Developing Countries?

Dobromir T Dimitrov, Benoit Masse, Marie-Claude Boily
{"title":"Who will Benefit from a Wide-Scale Introduction of Vaginal Microbicides in Developing Countries?","authors":"Dobromir T Dimitrov,&nbsp;Benoit Masse,&nbsp;Marie-Claude Boily","doi":"10.2202/1948-4690.1012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaginal microbicides (VMB) are currently among the few biomedical interventions designed to help women reduce their risk of acquiring HIV infection. However, the microbicide containing antiretroviral (ARV-VMB) may lead to the development of antiretroviral resistance and could paradoxically become more beneficial to men at the population level. We developed a mathematical model to study the impact of a wide-scale population usage of VMB in a heterosexual population. Gender ratios of prevented infections and prevalence reduction are evaluated in 63 different intervention schedules including continuous and interrupted ARV-VMB use by HIV-positive women. The influence of different factors on population-level benefits is also studied through Monte Carlo simulations using parameters sampled from primary ranges representative of developing countries. Our analysis indicates that women are more likely than men to benefit from ARV-VMB use since 78-80% of the total 63,000 simulations investigated (under different parameter sets) showed a female advantage whether benefit is measured as cumulative number of infections prevented, the percentage of cumulative infections prevented, or the expected reduction in prevalence. Stratified analysis by scenarios indicates that the likelihood of a male advantage with respect to the fractions of prevented infections varies from 6% to 49% among the scenarios. It is substantial only if the risk of systemic absorption and development of resistance to ARV-VMB is high and the HIV-positive women use VMB indefinitely without interruption. Therefore, the use of ARV-VMB, with successful control measures restricting usage by HIV-positive women, is still very much a female prevention tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":74867,"journal":{"name":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","volume":"2 1","pages":"1012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1948-4690.1012","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1948-4690.1012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Vaginal microbicides (VMB) are currently among the few biomedical interventions designed to help women reduce their risk of acquiring HIV infection. However, the microbicide containing antiretroviral (ARV-VMB) may lead to the development of antiretroviral resistance and could paradoxically become more beneficial to men at the population level. We developed a mathematical model to study the impact of a wide-scale population usage of VMB in a heterosexual population. Gender ratios of prevented infections and prevalence reduction are evaluated in 63 different intervention schedules including continuous and interrupted ARV-VMB use by HIV-positive women. The influence of different factors on population-level benefits is also studied through Monte Carlo simulations using parameters sampled from primary ranges representative of developing countries. Our analysis indicates that women are more likely than men to benefit from ARV-VMB use since 78-80% of the total 63,000 simulations investigated (under different parameter sets) showed a female advantage whether benefit is measured as cumulative number of infections prevented, the percentage of cumulative infections prevented, or the expected reduction in prevalence. Stratified analysis by scenarios indicates that the likelihood of a male advantage with respect to the fractions of prevented infections varies from 6% to 49% among the scenarios. It is substantial only if the risk of systemic absorption and development of resistance to ARV-VMB is high and the HIV-positive women use VMB indefinitely without interruption. Therefore, the use of ARV-VMB, with successful control measures restricting usage by HIV-positive women, is still very much a female prevention tool.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁将从发展中国家大规模使用阴道杀菌剂中受益?
阴道杀微生物剂是目前为数不多的旨在帮助妇女减少感染艾滋病毒风险的生物医学干预措施之一。然而,含有抗逆转录病毒的杀微生物剂(ARV-VMB)可能导致抗逆转录病毒耐药性的发展,并可能矛盾地在人口水平上对男性更有利。我们建立了一个数学模型来研究在异性恋人群中大规模使用VMB的影响。在63种不同的干预方案中,包括艾滋病毒阳性妇女持续和中断使用抗逆转录病毒药物治疗方案,评估了预防感染和减少流行率的性别比例。还通过蒙特卡罗模拟,利用从具有代表性的发展中国家的主要范围取样的参数,研究了不同因素对人口水平效益的影响。我们的分析表明,女性比男性更有可能从使用ARV-VMB中受益,因为在调查的63,000个模拟中(在不同参数集下),78-80%的模拟显示,无论以预防的累计感染数量、预防的累计感染百分比或预期的患病率降低来衡量,女性都具有优势。按情景进行的分层分析表明,在不同情景中,男性在预防感染的比例方面具有优势的可能性从6%到49%不等。只有当对ARV-VMB的全身吸收和产生耐药性的风险很高,并且艾滋病毒阳性妇女无限期地不间断地使用VMB时,它才是实质性的。因此,使用ARV-VMB,通过成功的控制措施限制艾滋病毒阳性妇女的使用,仍然是一种非常重要的女性预防工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study design approaches for future active-controlled HIV prevention trials. The role of randomization inference in unraveling individual treatment effects in early phase vaccine trials. Nonlinear mixed-effects models for HIV viral load trajectories before and after antiretroviral therapy interruption, incorporating left censoring. Estimation and interpretation of vaccine efficacy in COVID-19 randomized clinical trials Sample size calculation for active-arm trial with counterfactual incidence based on recency assay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1