The effect of buffering on pain and duration of local anesthetic in the face: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Oluwatola Afolabi, Amanda Murphy, Bryan Chung, Donald H Lalonde
{"title":"The effect of buffering on pain and duration of local anesthetic in the face: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Oluwatola Afolabi, Amanda Murphy, Bryan Chung, Donald H Lalonde","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The acidity of lidocaine preparations is believed to contribute to the pain of local anesthetic injection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of buffering lidocaine on the pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized trial involving 44 healthy volunteers was conducted. The upper lip was injected with a solution of: lidocaine 1% (Xylocaine, AstraZeneca, Canada, Inc) with epinephrine; and lidocaine 1% with epinephrine and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Volunteers reported pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six participants found the unbuffered solution to be more painful. Fifteen participants found the buffered solution to be more painful; the difference was not statistically significant. Twenty-one volunteers reported duration of anesthetic effect. The buffered solution provided longer anesthetic effect than the unbuffered solution (P=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although buffering increased the duration of lidocaine's anesthetic effect in this particular model, a decrease in the pain of the injection was not demonstrated, likely due to limitations of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":88320,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"21 4","pages":"209-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910524/pdf/cjps21209.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The acidity of lidocaine preparations is believed to contribute to the pain of local anesthetic injection.

Objective: To investigate the effect of buffering lidocaine on the pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized trial involving 44 healthy volunteers was conducted. The upper lip was injected with a solution of: lidocaine 1% (Xylocaine, AstraZeneca, Canada, Inc) with epinephrine; and lidocaine 1% with epinephrine and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Volunteers reported pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.

Results: Twenty-six participants found the unbuffered solution to be more painful. Fifteen participants found the buffered solution to be more painful; the difference was not statistically significant. Twenty-one volunteers reported duration of anesthetic effect. The buffered solution provided longer anesthetic effect than the unbuffered solution (P=0.004).

Conclusion: Although buffering increased the duration of lidocaine's anesthetic effect in this particular model, a decrease in the pain of the injection was not demonstrated, likely due to limitations of the study.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓冲剂对面部局麻药疼痛和持续时间的影响:双盲随机对照试验。
背景:利多卡因制剂的酸性被认为是导致局部麻醉注射疼痛的原因之一:利多卡因制剂的酸性被认为是导致局部麻醉注射疼痛的原因之一:目的:研究缓冲利多卡因对注射疼痛和麻醉效果持续时间的影响:方法:44 名健康志愿者参与了一项双盲随机试验。上唇注射的溶液分别为:1% 利多卡因(Xylocaine,阿斯利康,加拿大公司)加肾上腺素;1% 利多卡因加肾上腺素和 8.4% 碳酸氢钠。志愿者报告了注射疼痛和麻醉效果持续时间:26名参与者认为未缓冲溶液更痛。15 名参与者认为缓冲溶液更痛;差异无统计学意义。21 名志愿者报告了麻醉效果的持续时间。缓冲溶液的麻醉效果比未缓冲溶液更持久(P=0.004):结论:在这一特定模型中,虽然缓冲液延长了利多卡因的麻醉效果持续时间,但注射疼痛并没有减轻,这可能是由于研究的局限性造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1