The effect of buffering on pain and duration of local anesthetic in the face: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q Medicine Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Oluwatola Afolabi, Amanda Murphy, Bryan Chung, Donald H Lalonde
{"title":"The effect of buffering on pain and duration of local anesthetic in the face: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Oluwatola Afolabi, Amanda Murphy, Bryan Chung, Donald H Lalonde","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The acidity of lidocaine preparations is believed to contribute to the pain of local anesthetic injection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of buffering lidocaine on the pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized trial involving 44 healthy volunteers was conducted. The upper lip was injected with a solution of: lidocaine 1% (Xylocaine, AstraZeneca, Canada, Inc) with epinephrine; and lidocaine 1% with epinephrine and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Volunteers reported pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six participants found the unbuffered solution to be more painful. Fifteen participants found the buffered solution to be more painful; the difference was not statistically significant. Twenty-one volunteers reported duration of anesthetic effect. The buffered solution provided longer anesthetic effect than the unbuffered solution (P=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although buffering increased the duration of lidocaine's anesthetic effect in this particular model, a decrease in the pain of the injection was not demonstrated, likely due to limitations of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50714,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910524/pdf/cjps21209.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The acidity of lidocaine preparations is believed to contribute to the pain of local anesthetic injection.

Objective: To investigate the effect of buffering lidocaine on the pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized trial involving 44 healthy volunteers was conducted. The upper lip was injected with a solution of: lidocaine 1% (Xylocaine, AstraZeneca, Canada, Inc) with epinephrine; and lidocaine 1% with epinephrine and 8.4% sodium bicarbonate. Volunteers reported pain of injection and duration of anesthetic effect.

Results: Twenty-six participants found the unbuffered solution to be more painful. Fifteen participants found the buffered solution to be more painful; the difference was not statistically significant. Twenty-one volunteers reported duration of anesthetic effect. The buffered solution provided longer anesthetic effect than the unbuffered solution (P=0.004).

Conclusion: Although buffering increased the duration of lidocaine's anesthetic effect in this particular model, a decrease in the pain of the injection was not demonstrated, likely due to limitations of the study.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓冲剂对面部局麻药疼痛和持续时间的影响:双盲随机对照试验。
背景:利多卡因制剂的酸性被认为是导致局部麻醉注射疼痛的原因之一:利多卡因制剂的酸性被认为是导致局部麻醉注射疼痛的原因之一:目的:研究缓冲利多卡因对注射疼痛和麻醉效果持续时间的影响:方法:44 名健康志愿者参与了一项双盲随机试验。上唇注射的溶液分别为:1% 利多卡因(Xylocaine,阿斯利康,加拿大公司)加肾上腺素;1% 利多卡因加肾上腺素和 8.4% 碳酸氢钠。志愿者报告了注射疼痛和麻醉效果持续时间:26名参与者认为未缓冲溶液更痛。15 名参与者认为缓冲溶液更痛;差异无统计学意义。21 名志愿者报告了麻醉效果的持续时间。缓冲溶液的麻醉效果比未缓冲溶液更持久(P=0.004):结论:在这一特定模型中,虽然缓冲液延长了利多卡因的麻醉效果持续时间,但注射疼痛并没有减轻,这可能是由于研究的局限性造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plastic Surgery
Plastic Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
0.67
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
期刊最新文献
Accessibility and Insurance Coverage for Gender-affirming Surgery in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Donor Site Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP Flap: A Retrospective and Prospective Study in a Single Institution Commentary: Current Practices and Trends of Plastic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in Canada Commentary: Instagram Practices of Successful Plastic Surgeon Accounts: Is There a Magic Formula? Out-of-Pocket Costs and Physician Payment Variations in Abdominal Contouring: Evidence From United States Claims Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1