A survey of current practices in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalational injuries in Canadian burn centres.

Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Justin K Yeung, Leslie Tze Fung Leung, Anthony Papp
{"title":"A survey of current practices in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalational injuries in Canadian burn centres.","authors":"Justin K Yeung,&nbsp;Leslie Tze Fung Leung,&nbsp;Anthony Papp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize current Canadian practice patterns in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalation injuries (INHI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-question survey regarding the diagnosis of and interventions for INHI was sent to the medical directors of all 16 burn centres across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate to the survey was 50%. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is required for the diagnosis of INHI in only four centres (50%). The departments of intensive care, plastic surgery, otolaryngology and respirology are involved in performing fibreoptic bronchoscopy in 87.5%, 37.5%, 12.5% and 12.5% of Canadian burn centres, respectively. Intubation for INHI is most often based on physical examination results (87.5%) and clinical history (75%). The most common physical features believed to be most consistent with INHI are dyspnea (87.5%) and hoarseness (87.5%). Common treatments include intubation (87.5%), routine ventilatory support (87.5%) and chest physiotherapy (75%). None of the centres used nebulized heparin. A total of five centres (62.5%) routinely changed the fluid resuscitation protocol when INHI was diagnosed. Only two centres (25%) routinely used prophylactic antibiotics for INHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prospective, multicentre trials are needed to generate evidence-based consensus in the areas of diagnosis, grading and treatment for INHI in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":88320,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"21 4","pages":"221-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910522/pdf/cjps21221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarize current Canadian practice patterns in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalation injuries (INHI).

Methods: A 10-question survey regarding the diagnosis of and interventions for INHI was sent to the medical directors of all 16 burn centres across Canada.

Results: The response rate to the survey was 50%. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is required for the diagnosis of INHI in only four centres (50%). The departments of intensive care, plastic surgery, otolaryngology and respirology are involved in performing fibreoptic bronchoscopy in 87.5%, 37.5%, 12.5% and 12.5% of Canadian burn centres, respectively. Intubation for INHI is most often based on physical examination results (87.5%) and clinical history (75%). The most common physical features believed to be most consistent with INHI are dyspnea (87.5%) and hoarseness (87.5%). Common treatments include intubation (87.5%), routine ventilatory support (87.5%) and chest physiotherapy (75%). None of the centres used nebulized heparin. A total of five centres (62.5%) routinely changed the fluid resuscitation protocol when INHI was diagnosed. Only two centres (25%) routinely used prophylactic antibiotics for INHI.

Conclusion: Prospective, multicentre trials are needed to generate evidence-based consensus in the areas of diagnosis, grading and treatment for INHI in Canada.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大烧伤中心吸入性损伤诊断和干预措施的当前实践调查。
目的:总结目前加拿大在吸入性损伤(INHI)诊断和干预方面的实践模式。方法:向加拿大所有16个烧伤中心的医学主任发送了一份关于INHI诊断和干预措施的10个问题的调查。结果:调查回复率为50%。只有4个中心(50%)需要纤维支气管镜检查诊断INHI。重症监护室、整形外科、耳鼻喉科和呼吸科分别在87.5%、37.5%、12.5%和12.5%的加拿大烧伤中心进行纤维支气管镜检查。INHI的插管通常基于体格检查结果(87.5%)和临床病史(75%)。与INHI最一致的最常见的身体特征是呼吸困难(87.5%)和声音嘶哑(87.5%)。常见的治疗包括插管(87.5%)、常规通气支持(87.5%)和胸部物理治疗(75%)。没有一个中心使用雾化肝素。确诊INHI后,共有5个中心(62.5%)常规改变了液体复苏方案。只有两个中心(25%)常规使用INHI预防性抗生素。结论:需要前瞻性、多中心试验来在加拿大INHI的诊断、分级和治疗方面达成基于证据的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1