Optimal Policies for Reducing Unnecessary Follow-up Mammography Exams in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2013-09-01 DOI:10.1287/deca.2013.0272
Oguzhan Alagoz, Jagpreet Chhatwal, Elizabeth S Burnside
{"title":"Optimal Policies for Reducing Unnecessary Follow-up Mammography Exams in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.","authors":"Oguzhan Alagoz, Jagpreet Chhatwal, Elizabeth S Burnside","doi":"10.1287/deca.2013.0272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mammography is the most effective screening tool for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Based on the mammography findings, radiologists need to choose from one of the following three alternatives: 1) take immediate diagnostic actions including prompt biopsy to confirm breast cancer; 2) recommend a follow-up mammogram; 3) recommend routine annual mammography. There are no validated structured guidelines based on a decision-analytical framework to aid radiologists in making such patient management decisions. Surprisingly, only 15-45% of the breast biopsies and less than 1% of short-interval follow-up recommendations are found to be malignant, resulting in unnecessary tests and patient-anxiety. We develop a finite-horizon discrete-time Markov decision process (MDP) model that may help radiologists make patient-management decisions to maximize a patient's total expected quality-adjusted life years. We use clinical data to find the policies recommended by the MDP model and also compare them to decisions made by radiologists at a large mammography practice. We also derive the structural properties of the MDP model, including sufficiency conditions that ensure the existence of a double control-limit type policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46460,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1287/deca.2013.0272","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2013.0272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Mammography is the most effective screening tool for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Based on the mammography findings, radiologists need to choose from one of the following three alternatives: 1) take immediate diagnostic actions including prompt biopsy to confirm breast cancer; 2) recommend a follow-up mammogram; 3) recommend routine annual mammography. There are no validated structured guidelines based on a decision-analytical framework to aid radiologists in making such patient management decisions. Surprisingly, only 15-45% of the breast biopsies and less than 1% of short-interval follow-up recommendations are found to be malignant, resulting in unnecessary tests and patient-anxiety. We develop a finite-horizon discrete-time Markov decision process (MDP) model that may help radiologists make patient-management decisions to maximize a patient's total expected quality-adjusted life years. We use clinical data to find the policies recommended by the MDP model and also compare them to decisions made by radiologists at a large mammography practice. We also derive the structural properties of the MDP model, including sufficiency conditions that ensure the existence of a double control-limit type policy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少乳腺癌诊断中不必要的后续乳房x光检查的最佳政策。
乳房x光检查是早期诊断乳腺癌最有效的筛查工具。根据乳房x光检查结果,放射科医生需要从以下三种选择中选择一种:1)立即采取诊断措施,包括及时活检以确认乳腺癌;2)建议随访乳房x光检查;3)建议每年例行乳房x光检查。目前还没有基于决策分析框架的有效的结构化指南来帮助放射科医生做出这样的患者管理决策。令人惊讶的是,只有15-45%的乳房活组织检查和不到1%的短间隔随访建议被发现是恶性的,导致不必要的检查和患者焦虑。我们开发了一个有限视界离散时间马尔可夫决策过程(MDP)模型,可以帮助放射科医生做出患者管理决策,以最大限度地提高患者的总预期质量调整生命年。我们使用临床数据找到MDP模型推荐的政策,并将其与放射科医生在大型乳房x光检查实践中做出的决定进行比较。我们还得到了MDP模型的结构性质,包括保证双控制-限制型策略存在的充分条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Analysis
Decision Analysis MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Measuring and Mitigating the Risk of Advanced Cyberattackers On the Value of Information Across Decision Problems Curbing the Opioid Crisis: Optimal Dynamic Policies for Preventive and Mitigating Interventions From the Editor: 2023 Clemen–Kleinmuntz Decision Analysis Best Paper Award A Behavioral Model of Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains: The Role of Dual-Sourcing Bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1