Effect of Frailty on Functional Gain, Resource Utilisation, and Discharge Destination: An Observational Prospective Study in a GEM Ward.

Q2 Medicine Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-17 DOI:10.1155/2014/357857
Sujatha Kawryshanker, Warren Raymond, Katharine Ingram, Charles A Inderjeeth
{"title":"Effect of Frailty on Functional Gain, Resource Utilisation, and Discharge Destination: An Observational Prospective Study in a GEM Ward.","authors":"Sujatha Kawryshanker,&nbsp;Warren Raymond,&nbsp;Katharine Ingram,&nbsp;Charles A Inderjeeth","doi":"10.1155/2014/357857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. A geriatric evaluation and management unit (GEM) manages elderly inpatients with functional impairments. There is a paucity of literature on frailty and whether this impacts on rehabilitation outcomes. Objectives. To examine frailty score (FS) as a predictor of functional gain, resource utilisation, and destinations for GEM patients. Methods. A single centre prospective case study design. Participants (n = 136) were ≥65 years old and admitted to a tertiary hospital GEM. Five patients were excluded by the preset exclusion criteria, that is, medically unstable, severe dementia or communication difficulties after stroke. Core data included demographics, frailty score (FS), and functional independence. Results. The mean functional improvement (FIM) from admission to discharge was 11.26 (95% CI 8.87, 13.66; P < 0.001). Discharge FIM was positively correlated with admission FIM (β = 0.748; P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with frailty score (β = -1.151; P = 0.014). The majority of the patients were in the \"frail\" group. \"Frail\" and \"severely frail\" subgroups improved more on mean FIM scores at discharge, relative to that experienced by the \"pre-frail\" group. Conclusion. All patients experienced functional improvement. Frailer patients improved more on their FIM and improved relatively more than their prefrail counterparts. Higher frailty correlated with reduced independence and greater resource utilisation. This study demonstrates that FS could be a prognostic indicator of physical independence and resource utilisation. </p>","PeriodicalId":39066,"journal":{"name":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","volume":"2014 ","pages":"357857"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/357857","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/357857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background. A geriatric evaluation and management unit (GEM) manages elderly inpatients with functional impairments. There is a paucity of literature on frailty and whether this impacts on rehabilitation outcomes. Objectives. To examine frailty score (FS) as a predictor of functional gain, resource utilisation, and destinations for GEM patients. Methods. A single centre prospective case study design. Participants (n = 136) were ≥65 years old and admitted to a tertiary hospital GEM. Five patients were excluded by the preset exclusion criteria, that is, medically unstable, severe dementia or communication difficulties after stroke. Core data included demographics, frailty score (FS), and functional independence. Results. The mean functional improvement (FIM) from admission to discharge was 11.26 (95% CI 8.87, 13.66; P < 0.001). Discharge FIM was positively correlated with admission FIM (β = 0.748; P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with frailty score (β = -1.151; P = 0.014). The majority of the patients were in the "frail" group. "Frail" and "severely frail" subgroups improved more on mean FIM scores at discharge, relative to that experienced by the "pre-frail" group. Conclusion. All patients experienced functional improvement. Frailer patients improved more on their FIM and improved relatively more than their prefrail counterparts. Higher frailty correlated with reduced independence and greater resource utilisation. This study demonstrates that FS could be a prognostic indicator of physical independence and resource utilisation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱对功能增益、资源利用和出院目的地的影响:一项GEM病房的观察性前瞻性研究。
背景。一个老年评估和管理单位(GEM)管理有功能障碍的老年住院患者。缺乏关于虚弱以及这是否会影响康复结果的文献。目标。检验衰弱评分(FS)作为GEM患者功能增益、资源利用和目的地的预测因子。方法。单中心前瞻性案例研究设计。参与者(n = 136)年龄≥65岁,在三级医院GEM就诊。5例患者被排除在预先设定的排除标准之外,即医学不稳定、严重痴呆或卒中后的沟通困难。核心数据包括人口统计、衰弱评分(FS)和功能独立性。结果。入院至出院的平均功能改善(FIM)为11.26 (95% CI 8.87, 13.66;P < 0.001)。出院FIM与入院FIM呈正相关(β = 0.748;P < 0.001),与衰弱评分呈负相关(β = -1.151;P = 0.014)。大多数患者属于“虚弱”组。“虚弱”和“严重虚弱”亚组在出院时的平均FIM评分比“虚弱前”组改善更多。结论。所有患者的功能均有改善。体弱患者的FIM改善更多,相对于体弱患者的改善更大。脆弱程度越高,独立性越低,资源利用率越高。本研究表明FS可以作为身体独立性和资源利用的预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Glycemic Control in Older Adults in a Medical Center in Peru. Validation of the Retirement Resources Inventory in Persian: Assessing Psychometric Properties among Iranian Retirees. Physical Exercise for Healthy Older Adults and Those with Frailty: What Exercise Is Best and Is There a Difference? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Functional Aging: Integrating Functionality to a Multidimensional Assessment of Healthy Aging. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Impairment in Intrinsic Capacity among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Observational Study from South India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1