The Differences and Similarities between Allergists and Non-Allergists for Penicillin Allergy Management.

Journal of allergy Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-24 DOI:10.1155/2014/214183
Nayot Suetrong, Jettanong Klaewsongkram
{"title":"The Differences and Similarities between Allergists and Non-Allergists for Penicillin Allergy Management.","authors":"Nayot Suetrong,&nbsp;Jettanong Klaewsongkram","doi":"10.1155/2014/214183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the management of patients with a history of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists in Thailand. A questionnaire was distributed to Thai physicians by online survey. The answers from 205 physicians were analyzed. The discrepancy of penicillin allergy management between allergists and non-allergists was clearly demonstrated in patients with a history of an immediate reaction in the presence of penicillin skin test (P < 0.01) and in patients with a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (P < 0.05) from penicillin. Allergists are more willing to confirm penicillin allergic status, more likely to carefully administer penicillin even after negative skin test, but less concerned for the potential cross-reactivity with 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, compared to non-allergists. The lack of penicillin skin test reagents, the reliability of penicillin allergy history, and medicolegal problem were the main reasons for prescribing alternate antibiotics without confirmation of penicillin allergic status. In summary, the different management of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists was significantly demonstrated in patients with a history of severe non-immediate reaction and in patients with a history of an immediate reaction when a penicillin skin test is available. </p>","PeriodicalId":88910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of allergy","volume":"2014 ","pages":"214183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/214183","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/214183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the management of patients with a history of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists in Thailand. A questionnaire was distributed to Thai physicians by online survey. The answers from 205 physicians were analyzed. The discrepancy of penicillin allergy management between allergists and non-allergists was clearly demonstrated in patients with a history of an immediate reaction in the presence of penicillin skin test (P < 0.01) and in patients with a history of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (P < 0.05) from penicillin. Allergists are more willing to confirm penicillin allergic status, more likely to carefully administer penicillin even after negative skin test, but less concerned for the potential cross-reactivity with 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins, compared to non-allergists. The lack of penicillin skin test reagents, the reliability of penicillin allergy history, and medicolegal problem were the main reasons for prescribing alternate antibiotics without confirmation of penicillin allergic status. In summary, the different management of penicillin allergy between allergists and non-allergists was significantly demonstrated in patients with a history of severe non-immediate reaction and in patients with a history of an immediate reaction when a penicillin skin test is available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过敏专科医师与非过敏专科医师在青霉素过敏管理上的异同。
本研究的目的是比较泰国的过敏科医生和非过敏科医生对青霉素过敏史患者的管理。通过在线调查向泰国医生分发了一份问卷。对205名医生的回答进行了分析。在青霉素皮试有立即反应史的患者(P < 0.01)和有青霉素史的Stevens-Johnson综合征患者(P < 0.05)中,敏应科医师和非敏应科医师对青霉素过敏处理的差异明显。与非过敏专科医师相比,过敏专科医师更愿意确认青霉素过敏状态,即使皮试阴性也更可能谨慎地给药青霉素,但不太关心与第三代和第四代头孢菌素的潜在交叉反应。青霉素皮试试剂的缺乏、青霉素过敏史的可靠性以及医学法律问题是在未确认青霉素过敏状态的情况下开具替代抗生素的主要原因。总之,在有严重非立即反应史的患者和有立即反应史的患者中,当青霉素皮肤试验可用时,过敏科医师和非过敏科医师对青霉素过敏的不同处理得到了显著证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Skin Sensitization to Pollen of Date Palm in Marrakesh, Morocco. Exploring the Concern about Food Allergies among Secondary School and University Students in Ontario, Canada: A Descriptive Analysis. Validation of the English Version of the Scale for Psychosocial Factors in Food Allergy and the Relationship with Mental Health, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy A Simple Allergist-Led Intervention Improves Resident Training in Anaphylaxis Cloning and Expression of Ama r 1, as a Novel Allergen of Amaranthus retroflexus Pollen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1