Neuropathologic correlates of trial-related instruments for Alzheimer's disease.

American journal of neurodegenerative disease Pub Date : 2014-03-28 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01
Jeffrey L Cummings, John Ringman, Harry V Vinters
{"title":"Neuropathologic correlates of trial-related instruments for Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Jeffrey L Cummings,&nbsp;John Ringman,&nbsp;Harry V Vinters","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To advance disease-modifying therapies, it is critical to understand the relationship between the neuropathological changes of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and the clinical measures used in therapeutic trials. We reviewed neuropathologically proven cases of AD from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and examined correlations between neuropathological changes and clinical-trial related instruments collected as part of the Uniform Dataset (UDS). We explored the relationships between neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques, and total pathology burden with immediate and delayed recall, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Functional Activity Questionnaire, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores. 169 patients in NACC database had appropriate neuropathological and clinical data. All instruments correlated highly with neuritic plaques, Braak staging, and total pathology. Correlation coefficients for the relationships were relatively modest, suggesting that the pathologic burden examined accounts for between 13 and 40% of the variance of each of the instruments assessed. We conclude that there is a strong correlation between clinical trial-related measures and neuropathology identified at autopsy in AD. The amount of variance explained by the pathology is limited and other factors, both disease- and measurement-related, contribute to the variability observed in clinical measurements. </p>","PeriodicalId":72170,"journal":{"name":"American journal of neurodegenerative disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986610/pdf/ajnd0003-0045.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of neurodegenerative disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To advance disease-modifying therapies, it is critical to understand the relationship between the neuropathological changes of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and the clinical measures used in therapeutic trials. We reviewed neuropathologically proven cases of AD from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and examined correlations between neuropathological changes and clinical-trial related instruments collected as part of the Uniform Dataset (UDS). We explored the relationships between neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques, and total pathology burden with immediate and delayed recall, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Functional Activity Questionnaire, Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores. 169 patients in NACC database had appropriate neuropathological and clinical data. All instruments correlated highly with neuritic plaques, Braak staging, and total pathology. Correlation coefficients for the relationships were relatively modest, suggesting that the pathologic burden examined accounts for between 13 and 40% of the variance of each of the instruments assessed. We conclude that there is a strong correlation between clinical trial-related measures and neuropathology identified at autopsy in AD. The amount of variance explained by the pathology is limited and other factors, both disease- and measurement-related, contribute to the variability observed in clinical measurements.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默病试验相关仪器的神经病理学相关性
为了推进疾病改善治疗,了解阿尔茨海默病(AD)的神经病理变化与治疗试验中使用的临床措施之间的关系至关重要。我们回顾了来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(NACC)的神经病理学证实的AD病例,并检查了作为统一数据集(UDS)的一部分收集的神经病理变化与临床试验相关仪器之间的相关性。我们探讨了神经原纤维缠结、神经性斑块和总病理负担与即时和延迟回忆、临床痴呆评分-盒子总和、功能活动问卷、神经精神量表问卷和迷你精神状态检查分数之间的关系。NACC数据库中169例患者的神经病理和临床资料符合要求。所有仪器与神经斑块、Braak分期和总病理高度相关。这些关系的相关系数相对较低,表明所检查的病理负担占评估的每种工具方差的13%至40%。我们得出结论,临床试验相关措施与AD患者尸检时确定的神经病理学之间存在很强的相关性。病理学解释的变异量是有限的,其他因素,包括疾病和测量相关的因素,都有助于临床测量中观察到的变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exceptionally giant neglected sacral chordoma in a post-poliotic residual paralysis patient - a rare case scenario. Evaluation of willingness to obtain of Covid 19 vaccine in patients with multiple sclerosis. Short segment posterior fixation of unstable thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with fractured vertebra augmentation with intermediate pedicle screw - a clinicoradiological analysis. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis and Alzheimer's disease: a bibliometric analysis. Leveraging genetic diversity to understand monogenic Parkinson's disease's landscape in AfrAbia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1