Robot-assisted level II-IV neck dissection through a modified facelift incision: initial North American experience.

W Greer Albergotti, J Kenneth Byrd, John R De Almeida, Seungwon Kim, Umamaheswar Duvvuri
{"title":"Robot-assisted level II-IV neck dissection through a modified facelift incision: initial North American experience.","authors":"W Greer Albergotti,&nbsp;J Kenneth Byrd,&nbsp;John R De Almeida,&nbsp;Seungwon Kim,&nbsp;Umamaheswar Duvvuri","doi":"10.1002/rcs.1585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cosmesis is of increasing importance to the otolaryngology patient population. This is the first report of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection by North American groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective case-control study. Cases included three patients who underwent isolated, ipsilateral robot-assisted neck dissection. Operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node retrieval, total drainage, hospital stay and complications from this group were compared against the outcomes of six consecutive patients who underwent conventional neck dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative times were longer in robot-assisted neck dissection (mean 234 min) compared with the conventional neck dissection (mean 110 min). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted selective neck dissection of levels II-IV is feasible through a modified facelift incision. Our initial data suggest that this procedure is surgically sound. It should be applied by experienced surgeons who wish to avoid a cervical incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":75029,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","volume":"10 4","pages":"391-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rcs.1585","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background: Cosmesis is of increasing importance to the otolaryngology patient population. This is the first report of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection by North American groups.

Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study. Cases included three patients who underwent isolated, ipsilateral robot-assisted neck dissection. Operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node retrieval, total drainage, hospital stay and complications from this group were compared against the outcomes of six consecutive patients who underwent conventional neck dissection.

Results: Operative times were longer in robot-assisted neck dissection (mean 234 min) compared with the conventional neck dissection (mean 110 min). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other outcomes.

Conclusions: Robot-assisted selective neck dissection of levels II-IV is feasible through a modified facelift incision. Our initial data suggest that this procedure is surgically sound. It should be applied by experienced surgeons who wish to avoid a cervical incision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助II-IV级颈部清扫术通过改良的整容切口:初步的北美经验。
背景:美容对耳鼻喉科患者越来越重要。这是北美研究组首次报道机器人辅助颈部清扫的临床结果。方法:回顾性病例对照研究。病例包括3例患者,他们接受了孤立的,同侧机器人辅助的颈部清扫。将该组患者的手术时间、估计失血量、淋巴结回收、全引流、住院时间和并发症与连续6例接受常规颈部清扫的患者的结果进行比较。结果:机器人辅助颈清扫术的手术时间(平均234分钟)比常规颈清扫术(平均110分钟)更长。两组在其他结果上无显著差异。结论:通过改良的拉皮切口,机器人辅助的II-IV节段选择性颈部清扫是可行的。我们的初步数据表明,这种方法在外科上是可行的。它应该由经验丰富的外科医生使用,他们希望避免颈椎切口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Path Planning for Multiple Targets for Cannula Flexible Needle With Variable-Curvature Trajectories. Comparison of robotic and open central pancreatectomy. Full coverage path planning algorithm for MRgFUS therapy A deep learning framework for real‐time 3D model registration in robot‐assisted laparoscopic surgery A Novel Solution of Using Mixed Reality in Bowel and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Telepresence: 3D Mean Value Cloning algorithm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1