Initial experience of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in China.

Jia Huang, Qingquan Luo, Qiang Tan, Hao Lin, Liqiang Qian, Xu Lin
{"title":"Initial experience of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in China.","authors":"Jia Huang,&nbsp;Qingquan Luo,&nbsp;Qiang Tan,&nbsp;Hao Lin,&nbsp;Liqiang Qian,&nbsp;Xu Lin","doi":"10.1002/rcs.1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May 2009 to May 2013, 48 patients with intrathoracic lesions underwent RATS with the da Vinci® Surgical System was reported (11 lobectomies, 37 mediastinal tumour resections).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RATS was successfully and safely completed in all 48 patients. Conversion of the operation to open surgery was not needed in any patient. The average operation time was 85.9 min, average blood loss 33 ml, and average hospital stay 3.9 days. No patient required blood transfusion. The only recognized adverse event was the development of a bronchopleural fistula in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RATS appears feasible and safe in thoracic surgery. More investigation will be needed in order to determine its possible long-term benefits and cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":75029,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","volume":"10 4","pages":"404-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rcs.1589","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS).

Methods: From May 2009 to May 2013, 48 patients with intrathoracic lesions underwent RATS with the da Vinci® Surgical System was reported (11 lobectomies, 37 mediastinal tumour resections).

Results: RATS was successfully and safely completed in all 48 patients. Conversion of the operation to open surgery was not needed in any patient. The average operation time was 85.9 min, average blood loss 33 ml, and average hospital stay 3.9 days. No patient required blood transfusion. The only recognized adverse event was the development of a bronchopleural fistula in one patient.

Conclusions: RATS appears feasible and safe in thoracic surgery. More investigation will be needed in order to determine its possible long-term benefits and cost effectiveness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助胸腔镜手术在中国的初步经验。
背景:本研究的目的是评估机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)的安全性和可行性。方法:2009年5月至2013年5月,48例胸腔内病变患者采用达芬奇®手术系统行大鼠肺切除术(11例肺叶切除术,37例纵隔肿瘤切除术)。结果:48例患者均成功安全完成大鼠实验。所有患者均无需转开腹手术。平均手术时间85.9 min,平均失血量33 ml,平均住院时间3.9 d。没有病人需要输血。唯一确认的不良事件是一名患者发生支气管胸膜瘘。结论:大鼠实验在胸外科手术中是可行和安全的。需要进行更多的调查,以确定其可能的长期效益和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Objective Safety-Enhanced Path Planning for the Anterior Part of a Flexible Ureteroscope in Robot-Assisted Surgery. Validation of an Augmented Reality Based Functional Method to Determine and Render the Hip Rotation Centre During Total Hip Arthroplasty. Comparison of robotic and open central pancreatectomy. Full coverage path planning algorithm for MRgFUS therapy A deep learning framework for real‐time 3D model registration in robot‐assisted laparoscopic surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1