{"title":"Metacognitive change as a predictor of outcome in cognitive therapy for psychosis.","authors":"Sophie Parker, Adrian Wells, Anthony P Morrison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little known about predictors of response to cognitive therapy (CT) for psychosis. This study tests the hypothesis that metacognitive change at both end of treatment and follow-up is associated with positive outcomes in people with psychosis receiving CT.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients referred for CT for psychosis were offered CT over a maximum of 30 sessions. Assessments, including interview-based measures of psychotic symptoms and a questionnaire assessing metacognitive worry, were performed at pre-CT, post-CT and one-year follow-up. Data from 32 patients were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant positive relationships were found between metacognitive worry change scores at one-year follow-up and both positive symptoms of psychosis and particular dimensions of hallucinations. No significant relationships were found between metacognitive change and delusional symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that metacognitive change is associated with symptom change at followup. In particular, these benefits seem most evident in those people experiencing hallucinations. Methodological limitations and clinical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49288,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","volume":"51 1","pages":"8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is little known about predictors of response to cognitive therapy (CT) for psychosis. This study tests the hypothesis that metacognitive change at both end of treatment and follow-up is associated with positive outcomes in people with psychosis receiving CT.
Method: Patients referred for CT for psychosis were offered CT over a maximum of 30 sessions. Assessments, including interview-based measures of psychotic symptoms and a questionnaire assessing metacognitive worry, were performed at pre-CT, post-CT and one-year follow-up. Data from 32 patients were analyzed.
Results: Significant positive relationships were found between metacognitive worry change scores at one-year follow-up and both positive symptoms of psychosis and particular dimensions of hallucinations. No significant relationships were found between metacognitive change and delusional symptoms.
Conclusions: These results suggest that metacognitive change is associated with symptom change at followup. In particular, these benefits seem most evident in those people experiencing hallucinations. Methodological limitations and clinical implications are discussed.
期刊介绍:
THE ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY publishes original articles dealing with the all bio-psycho-social aspects of psychiatry. While traditionally the journal has published manuscripts relating to mobility, relocation, acculturation, ethnicity, stress situations in war and peace, victimology and mental health in developing countries, papers addressing all aspects of the psychiatry including neuroscience, biological psychiatry, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy and ethics are welcome. The Editor also welcomes pertinent book reviews and correspondence. Preference is given to research reports of no more than 5,000 words not including abstract, text, references, tables and figures. There should be no more than 40 references and 4 tables or figures. Brief reports (1,500 words, 5 references) are considered if they have heuristic value. Books to be considered for review should be sent to the editorial office. Selected book reviews are invited by the editor.