Minimally invasive treatment of clavicular fractures with cannulated screw.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2014-05-01 DOI:10.1111/os.12108
Jun-zhan Sun, Guo-hai Zheng, Ke-yi Zhao
{"title":"Minimally invasive treatment of clavicular fractures with cannulated screw.","authors":"Jun-zhan Sun,&nbsp;Guo-hai Zheng,&nbsp;Ke-yi Zhao","doi":"10.1111/os.12108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate minimally invasive treatment of clavicular fractures with cannulated screw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 65 patients who had undergone minimally invasive treatment with cannulated screws for clavicular fractures from April 2009 to October 2010 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with those of 65 patients with clavicular fractures who had been treated by the same surgeons with plates. In the study group, there were 41 males and 24 females, aged from 19-67 years (mean, 35.8 years). According to Craig's classification, there were 29 group 1 and 36 of group 2-II. Neer scores were used to evaluate shoulder function and radiographs to assess fracture union.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incision length was 4-5 cm in the cannulated screw group (CSG) and 10-11 cm in the reconstructive plate group (RPG). Radiographs showed bone union was achieved in both groups, the bone healing time being 13.2 ± 6.9 weeks in the CSG and 16.3 ± 8.7 weeks in the RPG. All patients were followed up for 6 to 20 months (average, 10.6 months). The average Neer score was 96.6 ± 3.4 in the CSG and 94.2 ± 5.8 in the RPG. In the CSG, screw loosening occurred in five, and fracture displacement in three. There was a significant difference in fracture healing time between two groups but not in Neer score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimally invasive treatment of clavicular fractures with cannulated screws has the advantages of minimal invasion, short bone healing time, good clinical outcomes, and being relatively inexpensive.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"6 2","pages":"121-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/os.12108","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate minimally invasive treatment of clavicular fractures with cannulated screw.

Methods: Data of 65 patients who had undergone minimally invasive treatment with cannulated screws for clavicular fractures from April 2009 to October 2010 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with those of 65 patients with clavicular fractures who had been treated by the same surgeons with plates. In the study group, there were 41 males and 24 females, aged from 19-67 years (mean, 35.8 years). According to Craig's classification, there were 29 group 1 and 36 of group 2-II. Neer scores were used to evaluate shoulder function and radiographs to assess fracture union.

Results: The incision length was 4-5 cm in the cannulated screw group (CSG) and 10-11 cm in the reconstructive plate group (RPG). Radiographs showed bone union was achieved in both groups, the bone healing time being 13.2 ± 6.9 weeks in the CSG and 16.3 ± 8.7 weeks in the RPG. All patients were followed up for 6 to 20 months (average, 10.6 months). The average Neer score was 96.6 ± 3.4 in the CSG and 94.2 ± 5.8 in the RPG. In the CSG, screw loosening occurred in five, and fracture displacement in three. There was a significant difference in fracture healing time between two groups but not in Neer score.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive treatment of clavicular fractures with cannulated screws has the advantages of minimal invasion, short bone healing time, good clinical outcomes, and being relatively inexpensive.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空心螺钉微创治疗锁骨骨折。
目的:探讨空心螺钉微创治疗锁骨骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2009年4月至2010年10月行微创空心螺钉治疗锁骨骨折65例患者的资料,并与同一术者行钢板治疗锁骨骨折65例患者的资料进行比较。研究组男性41例,女性24例,年龄19 ~ 67岁,平均35.8岁。根据Craig的分类,1组29例,2-II组36例。Neer评分用于评估肩关节功能,x线片用于评估骨折愈合。结果:空心螺钉组(CSG)切口长度为4 ~ 5 cm,重建钢板组(RPG)切口长度为10 ~ 11 cm。x线片显示两组均实现骨愈合,CSG组骨愈合时间为13.2±6.9周,RPG组为16.3±8.7周。随访6 ~ 20个月,平均10.6个月。CSG组平均Neer评分为96.6±3.4分,RPG组平均Neer评分为94.2±5.8分。在CSG中,5例发生螺钉松动,3例发生骨折移位。两组骨折愈合时间差异有统计学意义,但Neer评分差异无统计学意义。结论:空心螺钉微创治疗锁骨骨折具有微创、骨愈合时间短、临床效果好、费用相对低廉等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
The Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guide Plate for Patients Undergoing Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial. Evaluation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guidance for Patients With Spinal Metastasis. Comparing the Prognostic Utility of Vertebral and Endplate Bone Quality Scores for Cage Subsidence Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Reduced the Adjacent Intervertebral Bridging Ossification Rates in Patients With Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospectively Comparison Study. Impact of Early Surgery on Clinical Outcomes of Super-Aged Patients With Hip Fractures: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study With 2-Year Follow-Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1