Can Nephrologists Use Ultrasound to Evaluate the Inferior Vena Cava? A Cross-Sectional Study of the Agreement between a Nephrologist and a Cardiologist.

Nephron Extra Pub Date : 2014-04-30 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000362170
José Muniz Pazeli, Daniel Fagundes Vidigal, Tarcísio Cestari Grossi, Natália Maria Silva Fernandes, Fernando Colugnati, Rogério Baumgratz de Paula, Hélady Sanders-Pinheiro
{"title":"Can Nephrologists Use Ultrasound to Evaluate the Inferior Vena Cava? A Cross-Sectional Study of the Agreement between a Nephrologist and a Cardiologist.","authors":"José Muniz Pazeli,&nbsp;Daniel Fagundes Vidigal,&nbsp;Tarcísio Cestari Grossi,&nbsp;Natália Maria Silva Fernandes,&nbsp;Fernando Colugnati,&nbsp;Rogério Baumgratz de Paula,&nbsp;Hélady Sanders-Pinheiro","doi":"10.1159/000362170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The costs and the need for a specialist impair the implementation of ultrasonography for evaluating the inferior vena cava (IVC) to assess the volemic status in hemodialysis patients. We investigated whether a nephrologist with limited ultrasound training can accurately assess the IVC in patients undergoing hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cardiologist and a nephrologist consecutively measured the indexed IVC expiratory diameter (VCDi) and the IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) of 52 patients during hemodialysis sessions. In protocol I, the nephrologist used a regular ultrasound system (RUS) and the cardiologist used a cardiovascular ultrasound equipment; in protocol II, the machines were interchanged. Pearson and kappa coefficients and the interexaminer agreement by the Bland-Altman method were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VCDi measurements showed a strong correlation in both protocols (r = 0.88 and 0.84 in protocols I and II, respectively). The volemic classifications were excellent in protocol I (kappa = 0.82 and 0.93 by VCDi and IVCCI, respectively) and substantial in protocol II (kappa = 0.77 and 0.75 by VCDi and IVCCI, respectively). The interexaminer agreement on the VCDi measurements was very good in both protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound evaluation of the IVC can be performed by nephrologists using an RUS to assess the volemic status in hemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56356,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Extra","volume":"4 1","pages":"82-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000362170","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000362170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background/aims: The costs and the need for a specialist impair the implementation of ultrasonography for evaluating the inferior vena cava (IVC) to assess the volemic status in hemodialysis patients. We investigated whether a nephrologist with limited ultrasound training can accurately assess the IVC in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Methods: A cardiologist and a nephrologist consecutively measured the indexed IVC expiratory diameter (VCDi) and the IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) of 52 patients during hemodialysis sessions. In protocol I, the nephrologist used a regular ultrasound system (RUS) and the cardiologist used a cardiovascular ultrasound equipment; in protocol II, the machines were interchanged. Pearson and kappa coefficients and the interexaminer agreement by the Bland-Altman method were calculated.

Results: The VCDi measurements showed a strong correlation in both protocols (r = 0.88 and 0.84 in protocols I and II, respectively). The volemic classifications were excellent in protocol I (kappa = 0.82 and 0.93 by VCDi and IVCCI, respectively) and substantial in protocol II (kappa = 0.77 and 0.75 by VCDi and IVCCI, respectively). The interexaminer agreement on the VCDi measurements was very good in both protocols.

Conclusions: Ultrasound evaluation of the IVC can be performed by nephrologists using an RUS to assess the volemic status in hemodialysis patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾内科医生可以用超声评估下腔静脉吗?肾科医生和心脏病科医生协议的横断面研究。
背景/目的:超声检查下腔静脉(IVC)以评估血液透析患者血容量状态的成本和对专科医生的需求影响了超声检查的实施。我们调查了接受有限超声训练的肾脏科医生能否准确评估血液透析患者的IVC。方法:由心脏科医师和肾病科医师连续测量52例血液透析患者的下腔静脉呼气直径指数(VCDi)和下腔静脉湿陷指数(IVCCI)。在方案1中,肾病专家使用常规超声系统(RUS),心脏病专家使用心血管超声设备;在协议II中,机器是互换的。通过Bland-Altman方法计算Pearson系数和kappa系数以及考官之间的一致性。结果:VCDi测量值在两种方案中显示出很强的相关性(方案I和方案II的r分别为0.88和0.84)。方案I的血容量分类很好(VCDi和IVCCI kappa分别为0.82和0.93),方案II的血容量分类很好(VCDi和IVCCI kappa分别为0.77和0.75)。在两种方案中,审查员对VCDi测量结果的一致性非常好。结论:超声评估下腔静脉可以由肾科医师使用RUS评估血液透析患者的容血状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access subjournal to Nephron. ''Nephron EXTRA'' publishes additional high-quality articles that cannot be published in the main journal ''Nephron'' due to space limitations.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Oxidative Balance Scores and Biomarkers of Inflammation among Individuals with and without Chronic Kidney Disease. Proteinuria and the Clinical Course of Dobrava-Belgrade Hantavirus Infection. Evaluation of the Relationship between the Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Level at Dialysis Initiation and All-Cause Mortality: A Multicenter, Prospective Study. Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin as a Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury, Severe Kidney Injury, and the Need for Renal Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit. In IgA Nephropathy, Glomerulosclerosis Is Associated with Increased Urinary CD80 Excretion and Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor-Positive Podocyturia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1