The management of type 1 diabetes in Australian primary schools.

Anne Marks, Valerie Wilson, Jackie Crisp
{"title":"The management of type 1 diabetes in Australian primary schools.","authors":"Anne Marks,&nbsp;Valerie Wilson,&nbsp;Jackie Crisp","doi":"10.3109/01460862.2014.932860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore the management of type 1 diabetes in Australian primary schools: kindergarten-Year 2, from the parent's perspective. The study questions were: What diabetes treatment is being delivered? Who is providing the treatment? Where is the treatment given?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross sectional, descriptive approach was used to collect data from parents (66) of children with type 1 diabetes attending an Australian primary school (kindergarten-Year 2). An online self-administered questionnaire was designed in Survey Monkey and was available via a dedicated Facebook page. Data were analysed using statistical analysis (SPSSv21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood glucose testing was occurring for all children, with 49% of children self testing. 77% of children were receiving an insulin bolus or injection at school. 34% was provided by the child and 53% of insulin was given via pump. Teachers, parents and teacher's aides also provided insulin at school. There was a statistically significant association between the number of children receiving insulin at school and the insulin delivery device, χ(2 )= 16.75, df = 1, p ≤ 0.000). Children using insulin pump therapy were more likely (97%) to receive insulin at school than children who used injections (55%). Children who were able to self-administer insulin were more likely to receive insulin (93%) at school than children who were unable to self-administer insulin (65%) (χ(2 )= 7.38, df = 1, p = 0.007) 81% of children received diabetes treatment in the classroom, with the remainder in the school administration office.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Insulin administration across Australian primary schools was inconsistent. Not all children were receiving the recommended insulin treatment. Insulin pump therapy appears to increase access to this treatment at school.</p>","PeriodicalId":75953,"journal":{"name":"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing","volume":"37 3","pages":"168-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/01460862.2014.932860","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2014.932860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the management of type 1 diabetes in Australian primary schools: kindergarten-Year 2, from the parent's perspective. The study questions were: What diabetes treatment is being delivered? Who is providing the treatment? Where is the treatment given?

Methods: A cross sectional, descriptive approach was used to collect data from parents (66) of children with type 1 diabetes attending an Australian primary school (kindergarten-Year 2). An online self-administered questionnaire was designed in Survey Monkey and was available via a dedicated Facebook page. Data were analysed using statistical analysis (SPSSv21).

Results: Blood glucose testing was occurring for all children, with 49% of children self testing. 77% of children were receiving an insulin bolus or injection at school. 34% was provided by the child and 53% of insulin was given via pump. Teachers, parents and teacher's aides also provided insulin at school. There was a statistically significant association between the number of children receiving insulin at school and the insulin delivery device, χ(2 )= 16.75, df = 1, p ≤ 0.000). Children using insulin pump therapy were more likely (97%) to receive insulin at school than children who used injections (55%). Children who were able to self-administer insulin were more likely to receive insulin (93%) at school than children who were unable to self-administer insulin (65%) (χ(2 )= 7.38, df = 1, p = 0.007) 81% of children received diabetes treatment in the classroom, with the remainder in the school administration office.

Conclusion: Insulin administration across Australian primary schools was inconsistent. Not all children were receiving the recommended insulin treatment. Insulin pump therapy appears to increase access to this treatment at school.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚小学1型糖尿病的管理。
目的:本研究的目的是从家长的角度探讨澳大利亚小学:幼儿园- 10 - 2对1型糖尿病的管理。该研究的问题是:目前正在进行哪些糖尿病治疗?谁在提供治疗?在哪里进行治疗?方法:采用横断面描述性方法收集澳大利亚一所小学(幼儿园- 10 - 2年级)1型糖尿病儿童家长(66名)的数据。在Survey Monkey中设计了一份在线自我管理问卷,并通过专门的Facebook页面提供。采用统计学分析软件SPSSv21对数据进行分析。结果:所有儿童都进行了血糖检测,其中49%的儿童进行了自检。77%的儿童在学校接受胰岛素丸或注射。34%由患儿自行提供,53%通过泵给胰岛素。老师、家长和老师的助手也在学校提供胰岛素。在学校接受胰岛素治疗的儿童人数与胰岛素输送装置有统计学意义(χ(2)= 16.75, df = 1, p≤0.000)。使用胰岛素泵治疗的儿童在学校接受胰岛素治疗的可能性(97%)高于使用注射治疗的儿童(55%)。能够自我使用胰岛素的儿童(93%)比不能自我使用胰岛素的儿童(65%)更有可能在学校接受胰岛素治疗(χ(2)= 7.38, df = 1, p = 0.007) 81%的儿童在教室接受糖尿病治疗,其余在学校行政办公室接受治疗。结论:澳大利亚小学胰岛素给药不一致。并不是所有的孩子都接受了推荐的胰岛素治疗。胰岛素泵疗法似乎增加了在学校接受这种治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating Parenting Stress across Pediatric Health Conditions - A Systematic Review. Exploring Factors Influencing Transcultural Caring Relationships in the Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Setting: An Explorative Study. Ethical considerations: pediatric short-term medical missions in developing countries. The Effect of Parents' Self-Efficacy Perception on Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Behaviors of Turkish Preschool Children. Fresh Beginnings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1