Clinical utility of treprostinil in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: an evidence-based review.

Core Evidence Pub Date : 2014-06-20 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CE.S50607
Mitchell S Buckley, Andrew J Berry, Nadine H Kazem, Shardool A Patel, Paul A Librodo
{"title":"Clinical utility of treprostinil in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: an evidence-based review.","authors":"Mitchell S Buckley,&nbsp;Andrew J Berry,&nbsp;Nadine H Kazem,&nbsp;Shardool A Patel,&nbsp;Paul A Librodo","doi":"10.2147/CE.S50607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a progressive disease without a cure, despite the development of several treatment options over the past several decades. Its management strategy consists of the endothelin receptor antagonists (ambrisentan, bosentan, macitentan), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil), and prostacyclin analogs (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost). Treprostinil, a stable prostacyclin analog, displays vasodilatory effects in the pulmonary vasculature, as well as antiplatelet aggregation properties. Clinical practice guidelines recommend oral endothelin receptor antagonist or phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy in mild to moderate PAH. Epoprostenol is specifically suggested as first-line therapy in moderate to severe PAH patients (ie, World Health Organization/New York Heart Association functional class III-IV). However, treprostinil may be an alternative option in these severe PAH patients. The longer half-life and stability at room temperature with treprostinil may be associated with lower risk of pulmonary hemodynamic worsening as a result of abrupt infusion discontinuation and less frequent drug preparation. These characteristics make treprostinil an attractive alternative to continuous infusion of epoprostenol, due to convenience and patient safety. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous infusion of treprostinil as well as the inhaled and oral routes of administration in PAH. </p>","PeriodicalId":10764,"journal":{"name":"Core Evidence","volume":"9 ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CE.S50607","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Core Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CE.S50607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a progressive disease without a cure, despite the development of several treatment options over the past several decades. Its management strategy consists of the endothelin receptor antagonists (ambrisentan, bosentan, macitentan), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil), and prostacyclin analogs (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost). Treprostinil, a stable prostacyclin analog, displays vasodilatory effects in the pulmonary vasculature, as well as antiplatelet aggregation properties. Clinical practice guidelines recommend oral endothelin receptor antagonist or phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy in mild to moderate PAH. Epoprostenol is specifically suggested as first-line therapy in moderate to severe PAH patients (ie, World Health Organization/New York Heart Association functional class III-IV). However, treprostinil may be an alternative option in these severe PAH patients. The longer half-life and stability at room temperature with treprostinil may be associated with lower risk of pulmonary hemodynamic worsening as a result of abrupt infusion discontinuation and less frequent drug preparation. These characteristics make treprostinil an attractive alternative to continuous infusion of epoprostenol, due to convenience and patient safety. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous infusion of treprostinil as well as the inhaled and oral routes of administration in PAH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
treprostiil治疗肺动脉高压的临床应用:循证回顾。
肺动脉高压(PAH)仍然是一种无法治愈的进行性疾病,尽管在过去的几十年里有几种治疗方案的发展。其管理策略包括内皮素受体拮抗剂(氨布里森坦、波生坦、马西坦)、磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(西地那非、他达拉非、伐地那非)和前列环素类似物(epoprostenol、treprostinil、iloprost)。treprostiil是一种稳定的前列环素类似物,在肺血管中显示血管扩张作用,以及抗血小板聚集特性。临床实践指南推荐口服内皮素受体拮抗剂或磷酸二酯酶抑制剂治疗轻至中度PAH。环氧前列醇被特别建议作为中重度PAH患者的一线治疗(即世界卫生组织/纽约心脏协会功能分类III-IV)。然而,对于这些严重的PAH患者,曲前列替尼可能是一种替代选择。曲前列替尼较长的半衰期和室温下的稳定性可能与由于突然停止输注和较少的药物制备而导致肺血流动力学恶化的风险较低有关。由于方便和患者安全,这些特性使曲前列尼成为持续输注环氧前列醇的有吸引力的替代品。本综述的目的是评价持续输注曲前列地尼以及吸入和口服给药途径在PAH中的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Core Evidence
Core Evidence PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Core Evidence evaluates the evidence underlying the potential place in therapy of drugs throughout their development lifecycle from preclinical to postlaunch. The focus of each review is to evaluate the case for a new drug or class in outcome terms in specific indications and patient groups The emerging evidence on new drugs is reviewed at key stages of development and evaluated against unmet needs
期刊最新文献
Riociguat in the Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: An Evidence-Based Review of Its Place in Therapy. Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV): A Short Review on the Role of Netupitant-Palonosetron (NEPA). Vedolizumab in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Evidence-Based Review of Safety, Efficacy, and Place of Therapy. Apixaban: An Update of the Evidence for Its Place in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Pertuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: an evidence-based review of its safety, efficacy, and place in therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1