{"title":"Four centuries later: how to close the Galileo case?","authors":"Michael Segre","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"Galileo case\" is still open: John Paul II's 1979 initiative to \"recognize wrongs from whatever side they come\" was carried out in an unsatisfactory manner. The task would have been easy had the Pontifical Study Commission created for that purpose concentrated on the 1616 decree alone and declared it not in line with the hermeneutical guidelines of the Council of Trent, in agreement with Galileo and not with Saint Robert Bellarmine. A possible avenue to closing the \"Galileo case\" on the part of the Church of Rome could, thus, be to change its current defensive attitude and declare itself no longer what it was in 1616, since another such \"case\" is, hopefully, no longer conceivable.</p>","PeriodicalId":82321,"journal":{"name":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","volume":"48 1-2","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The "Galileo case" is still open: John Paul II's 1979 initiative to "recognize wrongs from whatever side they come" was carried out in an unsatisfactory manner. The task would have been easy had the Pontifical Study Commission created for that purpose concentrated on the 1616 decree alone and declared it not in line with the hermeneutical guidelines of the Council of Trent, in agreement with Galileo and not with Saint Robert Bellarmine. A possible avenue to closing the "Galileo case" on the part of the Church of Rome could, thus, be to change its current defensive attitude and declare itself no longer what it was in 1616, since another such "case" is, hopefully, no longer conceivable.
“伽利略案”仍然悬而未决:1979年约翰·保罗二世提出的“承认来自任何一方的错误”的倡议,以一种令人不满意的方式执行。如果为此目的而成立的宗座研究委员会(Pontifical Study Commission)只关注1616年的法令,并宣布它不符合天特会议(Council of Trent)的解释学指导方针,与伽利略(Galileo)达成一致,而不是与圣罗伯特·贝拉明(Saint Robert Bellarmine)达成一致,这项任务本来会很容易完成。因此,对罗马教会来说,结束“伽利略案”的一个可能途径是改变其目前的防御态度,宣布自己不再是1616年的样子,因为另一个这样的“案件”,希望不再是可以想象的。