Prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.

Indranil Banerjee, Tania Bhadury
{"title":"Prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.","authors":"Indranil Banerjee,&nbsp;Tania Bhadury","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.134980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescription is the written order of the physician which is conveyed to the patient. Rational prescription writing is a skill which should be mastered at the earliest. Internship is the period where undergraduate medical education can be consolidated through continued learning under the direct supervision of teachers. The attitude of interns toward rational drug use is of utmost importance. The present study aimed to explore the prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 2 months (June 1 2010-July 30 2010) in a primary health center attached to a medical college in India. The main outcome measure was to assess rationality of prescribing pattern of interns was measured as per World Health Organization enlisted prescribing indicators. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistical methods: Frequencies, percentage, and mean standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1968 drugs were prescribed in 760 prescriptions analyzed with an average of 2.58 drugs per prescription. Analgesic was the most commonly prescribed drug (25.78%) followed by antibiotics (22.1%), drugs used for gastrointestinal symptom (15.78%), multivitamins (11.84%), anti-malarials (8.35%), antihistaminics (6.25%), and hematinics (5.36%). Regarding prescribing indicators, in 435 prescriptions (22.4%), antibiotics were advised. A total of 688 (34.97%) drugs were prescribed by generic name, while the percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drug list of India was 58.47%. Injectables were prescribed in 89 prescriptions (4.49%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study shows that irrational prescribing practices are common among interns of the institute. The art of rational prescribing should be taught to them by medical teachers who are adequately trained in rational drug use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"5 2","pages":"40-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/8f/JBCP-5-40.PMC4074694.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.134980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Prescription is the written order of the physician which is conveyed to the patient. Rational prescription writing is a skill which should be mastered at the earliest. Internship is the period where undergraduate medical education can be consolidated through continued learning under the direct supervision of teachers. The attitude of interns toward rational drug use is of utmost importance. The present study aimed to explore the prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted for a period of 2 months (June 1 2010-July 30 2010) in a primary health center attached to a medical college in India. The main outcome measure was to assess rationality of prescribing pattern of interns was measured as per World Health Organization enlisted prescribing indicators. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistical methods: Frequencies, percentage, and mean standard deviation.

Results: A total of 1968 drugs were prescribed in 760 prescriptions analyzed with an average of 2.58 drugs per prescription. Analgesic was the most commonly prescribed drug (25.78%) followed by antibiotics (22.1%), drugs used for gastrointestinal symptom (15.78%), multivitamins (11.84%), anti-malarials (8.35%), antihistaminics (6.25%), and hematinics (5.36%). Regarding prescribing indicators, in 435 prescriptions (22.4%), antibiotics were advised. A total of 688 (34.97%) drugs were prescribed by generic name, while the percentage of drugs prescribed from essential drug list of India was 58.47%. Injectables were prescribed in 89 prescriptions (4.49%).

Conclusion: The present study shows that irrational prescribing practices are common among interns of the institute. The art of rational prescribing should be taught to them by medical teachers who are adequately trained in rational drug use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度一家初级保健中心实习生的处方模式。
背景:处方是医生传达给患者的书面命令。合理的处方书写是一项应尽早掌握的技能。实习是本科医学教育在教师的直接指导下,通过继续学习来巩固的阶段。实习生对合理用药的态度至关重要。本研究旨在探讨在印度初级卫生中心实习医生的处方模式。材料和方法:在印度一所医学院附属的初级保健中心进行了为期2个月的横断面研究(2010年6月1日至2010年7月30日)。主要结局指标为评价实习生处方模式的合理性,按照世界卫生组织编制的处方指标进行测量。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计方法:频率、百分比和平均标准偏差。结果:分析760张处方,共处方药物1968种,平均处方药物2.58种。镇痛药是最常见的处方药物(25.78%),其次是抗生素(22.1%)、胃肠道症状药物(15.78%)、复合维生素(11.84%)、抗疟疾药(8.35%)、抗组胺药(6.25%)和血液药(5.36%)。处方指标方面,435张处方(22.4%)建议使用抗生素。共有688种药物(34.97%)采用仿制名开具处方,而印度基本药物清单中开具的药物比例为58.47%。89张处方中使用注射剂,占4.49%。结论:我院实习生不合理处方现象普遍存在。应由在合理用药方面受过充分培训的医学教师向他们传授合理处方的艺术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note on Flavonoids Evaluation of Controlled Porosity Osmotic Pump for Oral Delivery of Ketorolac Prescribing Pattern and Potency of Anti-Diabetic Drugs in Diabetic Patients for Maintaining Optimal Glycemic Levels Community Pharmacy Practice Towards Cancer Health and the Need for Continuous Cancer Education: Ghana Situation Unusual Case of an Alcoholic with Liver Injury from Sulfasalazine Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1