{"title":"Weekly chlorhexidine douche: does it reduce healthcare-associated bloodstream infections?","authors":"Derya Seyman, Nefise Oztoprak, Hande Berk, Filiz Kizilates, Mestan Emek","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.931597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Daily chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing has been used as a precaution to reduce the rate of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (HA-BSI). The application frequency of CHG bathing remains unclear, this procedure has been implemented daily by this time. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of weekly whole-body douche with CHG shower gel on rates of HA-BSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective intervention trial in medical, surgical, and anesthesiology intensive care units (ICUs) in a tertiary teaching hospital from June 2011 to November 2012. This study included three periods. During the first period, patients received a daily bed bath by wiping with water and soap. In the second period patients were given a weekly douche with water and soap; in the third period patients were given a weekly douche with CHG shower gel. The rates of HA-BSI were compared between the three periods using Poisson regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The central line-associated bloodstream infection rates did not decline significantly between periods (p = 0.76). The laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBSI) rates in the first, second, and third periods were 7.1, 4, and 1.7, respectively. The LCBSI rates were reduced 43.7% from the first period to the second period (p = 0.03). In addition, there was a 57.5% reduction in LCBSI rates between the second and third periods (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the major decline (76.1%) was determined from the first to the third period (p < 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weekly douche with CHG shower gel significantly reduced LCBSI rates. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical impact of different intervals of CHG bathing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"46 10","pages":"697-703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.931597","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.931597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Daily chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing has been used as a precaution to reduce the rate of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (HA-BSI). The application frequency of CHG bathing remains unclear, this procedure has been implemented daily by this time. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of weekly whole-body douche with CHG shower gel on rates of HA-BSI.
Methods: We conducted a prospective intervention trial in medical, surgical, and anesthesiology intensive care units (ICUs) in a tertiary teaching hospital from June 2011 to November 2012. This study included three periods. During the first period, patients received a daily bed bath by wiping with water and soap. In the second period patients were given a weekly douche with water and soap; in the third period patients were given a weekly douche with CHG shower gel. The rates of HA-BSI were compared between the three periods using Poisson regression analysis.
Results: The central line-associated bloodstream infection rates did not decline significantly between periods (p = 0.76). The laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBSI) rates in the first, second, and third periods were 7.1, 4, and 1.7, respectively. The LCBSI rates were reduced 43.7% from the first period to the second period (p = 0.03). In addition, there was a 57.5% reduction in LCBSI rates between the second and third periods (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the major decline (76.1%) was determined from the first to the third period (p < 0.002).
Conclusions: Weekly douche with CHG shower gel significantly reduced LCBSI rates. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical impact of different intervals of CHG bathing.