Caucasion allied health students' attitudes towards African Americans: implications for instruction and research.

Robin Steed
{"title":"Caucasion allied health students' attitudes towards African Americans: implications for instruction and research.","authors":"Robin Steed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to determine Caucasian allied health student racial attitudes towards the African American population, students and faculty of a Southern school of allied health professions were surveyed using the Racial Argument Scale (RAS). A one way ANOVA found a significant difference between allied health programs, p = .008, and post hoc testing found the Occupational Therapy Program's scores to be significantly lower (less negative towards Blacks) than the Physical Therapy and Physician Assistant Program's scores (p = .008 and p = .041 respectively). Student scores overall were significantly higher than faculty scores on the RAS (p = .014). The Speech-Language Pathology, Physician Assistant, and Physical Therapy Programs' scores as well the overall allied health student scores were found to be significantly higher than the population mean, thus indicating a higher negativity towards African Americans. The overall results of this study indicate that negative racial bias may be a serious problem in some allied health programs. Future instruction in cultural competency in allied health programs should address racial bias specifically, taking into account cognitive-perceptual errors that may perpetuate negative racial attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74925,"journal":{"name":"The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc","volume":"25 3","pages":"80-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to determine Caucasian allied health student racial attitudes towards the African American population, students and faculty of a Southern school of allied health professions were surveyed using the Racial Argument Scale (RAS). A one way ANOVA found a significant difference between allied health programs, p = .008, and post hoc testing found the Occupational Therapy Program's scores to be significantly lower (less negative towards Blacks) than the Physical Therapy and Physician Assistant Program's scores (p = .008 and p = .041 respectively). Student scores overall were significantly higher than faculty scores on the RAS (p = .014). The Speech-Language Pathology, Physician Assistant, and Physical Therapy Programs' scores as well the overall allied health student scores were found to be significantly higher than the population mean, thus indicating a higher negativity towards African Americans. The overall results of this study indicate that negative racial bias may be a serious problem in some allied health programs. Future instruction in cultural competency in allied health programs should address racial bias specifically, taking into account cognitive-perceptual errors that may perpetuate negative racial attitudes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高加索联盟健康学生对非裔美国人的态度:对教学和研究的影响。
为了确定白人专职医疗学生对非洲裔美国人的种族态度,使用种族争论量表(RAS)对南方专职医疗专业学校的学生和教师进行了调查。单因素方差分析发现联合健康项目之间存在显著差异,p = 0.008,事后检验发现,职业治疗项目的得分显著低于物理治疗和医师助理项目的得分(p = 0.008和p = 0.041)。学生的总体得分显著高于教师的RAS得分(p = 0.014)。言语语言病理学、医师助理和物理治疗项目的得分以及综合健康学生的得分明显高于人口平均水平,因此表明对非裔美国人的负面情绪较高。本研究的总体结果表明,消极的种族偏见可能是一些联合健康计划中的一个严重问题。未来在联合医疗项目中对文化能力的指导应特别针对种族偏见,考虑到可能使消极的种族态度永永化的认知-知觉错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vaccines, Herd Immunity, and COVID-19. The First 100 Days Quality of Life Considerations During Cancer Treatment in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Patients: A Systemic Review. Greetings to ALL in the New Year. A Call About Concerns in 2017.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1