Pilot fatigue: relationships with departure and arrival times, flight duration, and direction.

Philippa H Gander, Hannah M Mulrine, Margo J van den Berg, A Alexander T Smith, T Leigh Signal, Lora J Wu, Gregory Belenky
{"title":"Pilot fatigue: relationships with departure and arrival times, flight duration, and direction.","authors":"Philippa H Gander,&nbsp;Hannah M Mulrine,&nbsp;Margo J van den Berg,&nbsp;A Alexander T Smith,&nbsp;T Leigh Signal,&nbsp;Lora J Wu,&nbsp;Gregory Belenky","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.3963.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Flight timing is expected to influence pilot fatigue because it determines the part of the circadian body clock cycle that is traversed during a flight. However the effects of flight timing are not well-characterized because field studies typically focus on specific flights with a limited range of departure times and have small sample sizes. The present project combined data from four studies, including 13 long-range and ultra-long range out-and-back trips across a range of departure and arrival times (237 pilots in 4-person crews, 730 flight segments, 1-3 d layovers).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies had tripartite support and underwent independent ethical review. Sleep was monitored (actigraphy) from 3 d prior to ≥ 3 d post-trip. Preflight and at top of descent (TOD), pilots rated their sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and fatigue (Samn-Perelli scale), and completed a psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) test. Mixed model ANOVA identified independent associations between fatigue measures and operational factors (domicile times of departure and arrival, flight duration and direction, landing versus relief crew).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preflight subjective fatigue and sleepiness were lowest for flights departing 14:00-17:59. Total in-flight sleep was longest on flights departing 18:00-01:59. At TOD, fatigue and sleepiness were higher and PVT response speeds were slower on flights arriving 06:00-09:59 than on flights arriving later. PVT response speed at TOD was also faster on longer flights.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings indicate the influence of flight timing (interacting with the circadian body clock cycle), as well as flight duration, on in-flight sleep and fatigue measures at TOD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":"85 8","pages":"833-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3963.2014","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3963.2014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Introduction: Flight timing is expected to influence pilot fatigue because it determines the part of the circadian body clock cycle that is traversed during a flight. However the effects of flight timing are not well-characterized because field studies typically focus on specific flights with a limited range of departure times and have small sample sizes. The present project combined data from four studies, including 13 long-range and ultra-long range out-and-back trips across a range of departure and arrival times (237 pilots in 4-person crews, 730 flight segments, 1-3 d layovers).

Methods: All studies had tripartite support and underwent independent ethical review. Sleep was monitored (actigraphy) from 3 d prior to ≥ 3 d post-trip. Preflight and at top of descent (TOD), pilots rated their sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale) and fatigue (Samn-Perelli scale), and completed a psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) test. Mixed model ANOVA identified independent associations between fatigue measures and operational factors (domicile times of departure and arrival, flight duration and direction, landing versus relief crew).

Results: Preflight subjective fatigue and sleepiness were lowest for flights departing 14:00-17:59. Total in-flight sleep was longest on flights departing 18:00-01:59. At TOD, fatigue and sleepiness were higher and PVT response speeds were slower on flights arriving 06:00-09:59 than on flights arriving later. PVT response speed at TOD was also faster on longer flights.

Discussion: The findings indicate the influence of flight timing (interacting with the circadian body clock cycle), as well as flight duration, on in-flight sleep and fatigue measures at TOD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飞行员疲劳:与起飞和到达时间,飞行时间和方向的关系。
导读:预计飞行时间会影响飞行员疲劳,因为它决定了飞行过程中穿越的生理时钟周期的一部分。然而,飞行时间的影响并没有很好地表征,因为实地研究通常集中在起飞时间范围有限的特定航班上,而且样本量很小。目前的项目结合了四项研究的数据,包括13次远程和超远程往返旅行,跨越一定的出发和到达时间(237名飞行员,4人机组,730个航段,1-3天的中转)。方法:所有研究均有三方支持,并进行了独立的伦理审查。从旅行前3天至旅行后≥3天监测睡眠(活动记录仪)。在飞行前和下降的顶端(TOD),飞行员评估他们的困倦(卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表)和疲劳(Samn-Perelli量表),并完成一个精神运动警觉性任务(PVT)测试。混合模型方差分析确定了疲劳测量与操作因素(出发地和到达地时间、飞行时间和方向、着陆与救援人员)之间的独立关联。结果:起飞时间为14:00-17:59的航班,飞行前主观疲劳和困倦程度最低。从18:00至01:59出发的航班的机上睡眠时间最长。到达时间为06:00-09:59的航班比到达时间晚的航班的疲劳和困倦程度更高,PVT反应速度更慢。在长途飞行中,TOD的PVT反应速度也更快。讨论:研究结果表明飞行时间(与生物钟周期相互作用)以及飞行时间对TOD飞行中睡眠和疲劳测量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Chronic bacterial prostatitis. Carpe diem. Temperature changes in selected areas of body surface induced by systemic cryostimulation. Comparison of in-flight measures with predictions of a bio-mathematical fatigue model. Demographic and occupational predictors of neck pain in pilots: analysis and multinational comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1