How do GPs versus GP trainees adapt to electronic health records? A Portuguese pilot study.

Filipe Prazeres
{"title":"How do GPs versus GP trainees adapt to electronic health records? A Portuguese pilot study.","authors":"Filipe Prazeres","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v21i3.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compares general practitioners (GPs) and general practice trainees (GPTs) on the adaptation to the electronic health records (EHRs) and how they perceive its impact on medical consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional, descriptive study. The link for an online questionnaire was sent to mainland Portuguese health care centre groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 147 physicians (100 females and 47 males). GPs had more learning difficulties in using the EHR (P < 0.05), greater difficulty in keeping regular updated records (P < 0.001) and a more noticeable fear of the possibility of occurring prescription errors (P < 0.05), when compared with GPTs. Most GPs (75%) and GPTs (80.4%) are satisfied with how they use the EHR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants have adhered to the EHR, and are satisfied with its use. A negative impact on medical consultations was not observed. However, it is the group of GPs that is less adapted to the electronic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"21 3","pages":"139-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i3.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: This study compares general practitioners (GPs) and general practice trainees (GPTs) on the adaptation to the electronic health records (EHRs) and how they perceive its impact on medical consultations.

Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. The link for an online questionnaire was sent to mainland Portuguese health care centre groups.

Results: A total of 147 physicians (100 females and 47 males). GPs had more learning difficulties in using the EHR (P < 0.05), greater difficulty in keeping regular updated records (P < 0.001) and a more noticeable fear of the possibility of occurring prescription errors (P < 0.05), when compared with GPTs. Most GPs (75%) and GPTs (80.4%) are satisfied with how they use the EHR.

Conclusions: Most participants have adhered to the EHR, and are satisfied with its use. A negative impact on medical consultations was not observed. However, it is the group of GPs that is less adapted to the electronic system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生和全科医生实习生如何适应电子健康记录?葡萄牙试点研究。
背景:本研究比较了全科医生(gp)和全科实习生(GPTs)对电子健康记录(EHRs)的适应情况,以及他们如何看待电子健康记录对医疗咨询的影响。方法:横断面、描述性研究。一份在线调查问卷的链接被发送给葡萄牙大陆的卫生保健中心集团。结果:共147名医生(女100名,男47名)。全科医生在使用电子病历方面有更多的学习困难(P < 0.05),在保持定期更新记录方面有更大的困难(P < 0.001),并且对发生处方错误的可能性有更明显的恐惧(P < 0.05)。大多数全科医生(75%)和gp(80.4%)对他们使用电子病历的方式感到满意。结论:大多数参与者坚持使用电子病历,并对其使用感到满意。没有观察到对医疗咨询产生负面影响。然而,这群普通医生对电子系统的适应程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring an informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: older adults' perceptions. Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records. Coding errors in an analysis of the impact of pay-for-performance on the care for long-term cardiovascular disease: a case study. Effective pseudonymisation and explicit statements of public interest to ensure the benefits of sharing health data for research, quality improvement and health service management outweigh the risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1