Approaches and challenges to optimising primary care teams' electronic health record usage.

Nancy Pandhi, Wan-Lin Yang, Zaher Karp, Alexander Young, John W Beasley, Sally Kraft, Pascale Carayon
{"title":"Approaches and challenges to optimising primary care teams' electronic health record usage.","authors":"Nancy Pandhi,&nbsp;Wan-Lin Yang,&nbsp;Zaher Karp,&nbsp;Alexander Young,&nbsp;John W Beasley,&nbsp;Sally Kraft,&nbsp;Pascale Carayon","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v21i3.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the presence of an electronic health record (EHR) alone does not ensure high quality, efficient care, few studies have focused on the work of those charged with optimising use of existing EHR functionality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the approaches used and challenges perceived by analysts supporting the optimisation of primary care teams' EHR use at a large U.S. academic health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted. Optimisation analysts and their supervisor were interviewed and data were analysed for themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysts needed to reconcile the tension created by organisational mandates focused on the standardisation of EHR processes with the primary care teams' demand for EHR customisation. They gained an understanding of health information technology (HIT) leadership's and primary care team's goals through attending meetings, reading meeting minutes and visiting with clinical teams. Within what was organisationally possible, EHR education could then be tailored to fit team needs. Major challenges were related to organisational attempts to standardise EHR use despite varied clinic contexts, personnel readiness and technical issues with the EHR platform. Forcing standardisation upon clinical needs that current EHR functionality could not satisfy was difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dedicated optimisation analysts can add value to health systems through playing a mediating role between HIT leadership and care teams. Our findings imply that EHR optimisation should be performed with an in-depth understanding of the workflow, cognitive and interactional activities in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"21 3","pages":"142-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258388/pdf/nihms645282.pdf","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i3.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: Although the presence of an electronic health record (EHR) alone does not ensure high quality, efficient care, few studies have focused on the work of those charged with optimising use of existing EHR functionality.

Objective: To examine the approaches used and challenges perceived by analysts supporting the optimisation of primary care teams' EHR use at a large U.S. academic health care system.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted. Optimisation analysts and their supervisor were interviewed and data were analysed for themes.

Results: Analysts needed to reconcile the tension created by organisational mandates focused on the standardisation of EHR processes with the primary care teams' demand for EHR customisation. They gained an understanding of health information technology (HIT) leadership's and primary care team's goals through attending meetings, reading meeting minutes and visiting with clinical teams. Within what was organisationally possible, EHR education could then be tailored to fit team needs. Major challenges were related to organisational attempts to standardise EHR use despite varied clinic contexts, personnel readiness and technical issues with the EHR platform. Forcing standardisation upon clinical needs that current EHR functionality could not satisfy was difficult.

Conclusions: Dedicated optimisation analysts can add value to health systems through playing a mediating role between HIT leadership and care teams. Our findings imply that EHR optimisation should be performed with an in-depth understanding of the workflow, cognitive and interactional activities in primary care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化初级保健团队电子健康记录使用的方法和挑战。
背景:虽然电子健康记录(EHR)的存在本身并不能确保高质量、高效的护理,但很少有研究关注那些负责优化现有EHR功能使用的人的工作。目的:研究在美国一个大型学术卫生保健系统中,支持初级保健团队使用电子病历优化的分析人员所使用的方法和面临的挑战。方法:进行定性研究。对优化分析师及其主管进行了访谈,并对主题进行了数据分析。结果:分析人员需要协调组织授权所产生的紧张关系,重点是电子病历流程的标准化与初级保健团队对电子病历定制的需求。他们通过参加会议、阅读会议记录和访问临床团队,了解卫生信息技术(HIT)领导层和初级保健团队的目标。在组织可能的范围内,电子病历教育可以根据团队的需要进行调整。主要的挑战与组织尝试标准化电子病历的使用有关,尽管不同的诊所环境,人员准备和电子病历平台的技术问题。目前EHR功能无法满足的临床需求是很难强制标准化的。结论:专门的优化分析师可以通过在HIT领导和护理团队之间发挥中介作用来增加卫生系统的价值。我们的研究结果表明,电子病历优化应该在深入了解初级保健工作流程、认知和互动活动的基础上进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring an informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: older adults' perceptions. Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records. Coding errors in an analysis of the impact of pay-for-performance on the care for long-term cardiovascular disease: a case study. Effective pseudonymisation and explicit statements of public interest to ensure the benefits of sharing health data for research, quality improvement and health service management outweigh the risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1