[Post-operative evaluation of 63 cases of rhinoseptoplastie by nasal frameworks].

C Hardy, D Goga, F Disant
{"title":"[Post-operative evaluation of 63 cases of rhinoseptoplastie by nasal frameworks].","authors":"C Hardy,&nbsp;D Goga,&nbsp;F Disant","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rhinoplasty is a difficult operation in plastic surgery of the face. The principles of the extracorporeal septoplasty were launched in the 50's, consisting of the treatment of the septal framework outside the nose. The most recent evolution, which is the creation of nasal frameworks required a precise evaluation of the results.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The patients having benefited from a rhinoseptoplasty by nasal frameworks are included. Eleven criteria are studied. Every patient is rated before and after rhinoplasty procedure, one point if improvement of the criterion, zero if no modification and -1 if degradation of the criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty three patients were operated, 54 women and 9 men. The postoperative average follow-up is of 5 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cartilaginous nasal frameworks, allows on complex noses (diverted, traumatic), an improvement of the righteousness of the dorsum (88%), of the projection of the tip (82.5%), of the naso-labial angle (84%), lines of Sheen (63%). An extension of the middle nose is observed in 28% of the patients, counterparty of a functional and inhaling nose.</p>","PeriodicalId":76469,"journal":{"name":"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie","volume":"134 4-5","pages":"175-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The rhinoplasty is a difficult operation in plastic surgery of the face. The principles of the extracorporeal septoplasty were launched in the 50's, consisting of the treatment of the septal framework outside the nose. The most recent evolution, which is the creation of nasal frameworks required a precise evaluation of the results.

Patients and methods: The patients having benefited from a rhinoseptoplasty by nasal frameworks are included. Eleven criteria are studied. Every patient is rated before and after rhinoplasty procedure, one point if improvement of the criterion, zero if no modification and -1 if degradation of the criterion.

Results: Sixty three patients were operated, 54 women and 9 men. The postoperative average follow-up is of 5 months.

Conclusions: The cartilaginous nasal frameworks, allows on complex noses (diverted, traumatic), an improvement of the righteousness of the dorsum (88%), of the projection of the tip (82.5%), of the naso-labial angle (84%), lines of Sheen (63%). An extension of the middle nose is observed in 28% of the patients, counterparty of a functional and inhaling nose.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻架鼻中隔成形术63例术后评价
鼻整形术是面部整形外科中比较困难的手术。体外鼻中隔成形术的原理是在50年代推出的,包括鼻中隔框架的治疗。最近的进化是鼻腔框架的创造,需要对结果进行精确的评估。患者和方法:患者受益于鼻中隔成形术鼻框架包括。研究了11项标准。每位患者在隆鼻手术前后都要打分,标准改善得1分,没有改善得0分,标准退化得-1分。结果:手术63例,女性54例,男性9例。术后平均随访5个月。结论:软骨鼻支架,可以改善复杂鼻(偏鼻、外伤),改善鼻背的正确率(88%),鼻尖的突出度(82.5%),鼻唇角(84%),光滑线(63%)。28%的患者中鼻延伸,与功能鼻和吸入性鼻相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Surgical instrumentation]. [Hemostasis]. [Sarcoidosis of the thyroid: A case report]. Epitympanic osteoma of the middle ear: A case report and literature review. [A post-styloid mass revealing a parapharyngeal schwannoma].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1