I prescribe, therefore I am?

Melissa Gill, MacDara McCauley
{"title":"I prescribe, therefore I am?","authors":"Melissa Gill, MacDara McCauley","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.5.250a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their qualitative study, we imagine that Martean & Evans1 captured the views of the majority of psychiatrists on their experiences of prescribing for personality disorder. Although we could identify with all of the themes determined as reasons for prescribing, we feel that the article highlighted a number of worrying trends within the profession that need to be addressed. \n \nThere appears to have been a shift away from a psychotherapeutic approach in psychiatry toward a distinct reliance on prescribing. The authors describe a theme of utilising prescribing as a method of communicating empathy. We would argue that it is disappointing if psychiatrists can only demonstrate empathy through the use of a prescription pad. It would seem that potential harm, in the form of possible serious side-effects, addiction, polypharmacy and indeed overdose facilitated by such a prescription may be more likely than benefit. Primum non nocere would suggest that, in the absence of convincing evidence for prescribing for personality disorders, the responsibility lies with the doctor to examine alternatives. \n \nThe authors themselves identify one potential solution in their recognition that ‘problems as much or perhaps more than diagnosis may be crucial to explore for patients with personality disorder’. Problem-solving therapy has been shown to improve depression, hopelessness and personal problems in patients who self-harm2 and has demonstrated specific benefit as a preliminary measure for patients with a personality disorder.3 Perhaps this may be a useful initial intervention to avoid feeling helpless in such consultations. Longer-term options such as dialectical behaviour therapy and specialised counselling for trauma experienced in childhood allow deflection away from the prescription. \n \nWhile we acknowledge that treating patients with personality disorders is often challenging, we believe the profession needs to move away from the notion of ‘I prescribe, therefore I am’. Ultimately, the increased focus on psychotherapy in the updated curricula of both the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland represents a positive paradigm shift in training toward a return to the psychotherapeutic, rather than solely prescribing, role of the psychiatrist.","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 5","pages":"250-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.5.250a","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.5.250a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their qualitative study, we imagine that Martean & Evans1 captured the views of the majority of psychiatrists on their experiences of prescribing for personality disorder. Although we could identify with all of the themes determined as reasons for prescribing, we feel that the article highlighted a number of worrying trends within the profession that need to be addressed. There appears to have been a shift away from a psychotherapeutic approach in psychiatry toward a distinct reliance on prescribing. The authors describe a theme of utilising prescribing as a method of communicating empathy. We would argue that it is disappointing if psychiatrists can only demonstrate empathy through the use of a prescription pad. It would seem that potential harm, in the form of possible serious side-effects, addiction, polypharmacy and indeed overdose facilitated by such a prescription may be more likely than benefit. Primum non nocere would suggest that, in the absence of convincing evidence for prescribing for personality disorders, the responsibility lies with the doctor to examine alternatives. The authors themselves identify one potential solution in their recognition that ‘problems as much or perhaps more than diagnosis may be crucial to explore for patients with personality disorder’. Problem-solving therapy has been shown to improve depression, hopelessness and personal problems in patients who self-harm2 and has demonstrated specific benefit as a preliminary measure for patients with a personality disorder.3 Perhaps this may be a useful initial intervention to avoid feeling helpless in such consultations. Longer-term options such as dialectical behaviour therapy and specialised counselling for trauma experienced in childhood allow deflection away from the prescription. While we acknowledge that treating patients with personality disorders is often challenging, we believe the profession needs to move away from the notion of ‘I prescribe, therefore I am’. Ultimately, the increased focus on psychotherapy in the updated curricula of both the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland represents a positive paradigm shift in training toward a return to the psychotherapeutic, rather than solely prescribing, role of the psychiatrist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我开药方,故我在?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
H. BYZANTINE HISTORY S. AFRICA Frontmatter D. THE ANCIENT EAST T. AMERICA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1