Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2014-10-07 DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13402
Bergthor Björnsson, Per Sandström
{"title":"Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.","authors":"Bergthor Björnsson,&nbsp;Per Sandström","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the first report on laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) appeared in the 1990s, the procedure has been performed increasingly frequently to treat both benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. Many earlier publications have shown LDP to be a good alternative to open distal pancreatectomy for benign lesions, although this has never been studied in a prospective, randomized manner. The evidence for the use of LDP to treat adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is not as well established. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current evidence for LDP in cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We conducted a review of English language publications reporting LDP results between 1990 and 2013. All studies reporting results in patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included. Thirty-nine publications were found and included in the results for a total of 309 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (potential double publications were not eliminated). Most LDP procedures are performed in selected cases and generally involve smaller tumors than open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) procedures. Some of the papers report unselected cases and include procedures on larger tumors. The number of lymph nodes harvested using LDP is comparable to the number obtained with ODP, as is the frequency of R0 resections. Current data suggest that similar short term oncological results can be obtained using LDP as those obtained using ODP. </p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"20 37","pages":"13402-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13402","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Since the first report on laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) appeared in the 1990s, the procedure has been performed increasingly frequently to treat both benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. Many earlier publications have shown LDP to be a good alternative to open distal pancreatectomy for benign lesions, although this has never been studied in a prospective, randomized manner. The evidence for the use of LDP to treat adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is not as well established. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current evidence for LDP in cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We conducted a review of English language publications reporting LDP results between 1990 and 2013. All studies reporting results in patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included. Thirty-nine publications were found and included in the results for a total of 309 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (potential double publications were not eliminated). Most LDP procedures are performed in selected cases and generally involve smaller tumors than open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) procedures. Some of the papers report unselected cases and include procedures on larger tumors. The number of lymph nodes harvested using LDP is comparable to the number obtained with ODP, as is the frequency of R0 resections. Current data suggest that similar short term oncological results can be obtained using LDP as those obtained using ODP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术治疗胰腺腺癌。
自20世纪90年代首次报道腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)以来,该手术越来越频繁地用于治疗胰腺的良性和恶性病变。许多早期的出版物已经表明LDP是良性病变开腹远端胰腺切除术的一个很好的选择,尽管这从未在前瞻性,随机方式研究。使用LDP治疗胰腺腺癌的证据还没有得到很好的证实。本综述的目的是评估目前LDP在胰腺腺癌病例中的证据。我们对1990年至2013年间报道自民党结果的英文出版物进行了回顾。所有报告组织学证实的胰腺腺癌患者结果的研究均被纳入。在总共309例胰腺腺癌病例中发现并纳入了39篇文献(未排除潜在的双重文献)。大多数LDP手术是在选定的病例中进行的,通常涉及比开放式远端胰腺切除术(ODP)手术更小的肿瘤。一些论文报告了未选定的病例,包括对较大肿瘤的治疗。使用LDP获得的淋巴结数量与使用ODP获得的数量相当,R0切除的频率也是如此。目前的数据表明,使用LDP可以获得与使用ODP相似的短期肿瘤学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical, pathological characteristics and long-term outcomes of hepatitis B virus related cirrhosis in pediatric observational study. Molecular links between inflammatory bowel disease and Alzheimer's disease through immune signaling and inflammatory pathways. Clinical outcomes and drug sustainability after non-medical switch from ustekinumab originator to biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease. Capecitabine maintenance after radiofrequency ablation: A preventive strategy for lung oligometastases from colorectal cancer. Sphinganine inhibits macrophage polarization and protects against sepsis-induced intestinal injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1