A metabolic simulator for unmanned testing of breathing apparatuses in hyperbaric conditions.

Oskar Frånberg, Mario Loncar, Åke Larsson, Hans Ornhagen, Mikael Gennser
{"title":"A metabolic simulator for unmanned testing of breathing apparatuses in hyperbaric conditions.","authors":"Oskar Frånberg,&nbsp;Mario Loncar,&nbsp;Åke Larsson,&nbsp;Hans Ornhagen,&nbsp;Mikael Gennser","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4047.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A major part of testing of rebreather apparatuses for underwater diving focuses on the oxygen dosage system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A metabolic simulator for testing breathing apparatuses was built and evaluated. Oxygen consumption was achieved through catalytic combustion of propene. With an admixture of carbon dioxide in the propene fuel, the system allowed the respiratory exchange ratio to be set freely within human variability and also made it possible to increase test pressures above the condensation pressure of propene. The system was tested by breathing ambient air in a pressure chamber with oxygen uptake (Vo₂) ranging from 1-4 L · min(-1), tidal volume (VT) from 1-3 L, breathing frequency (f) of 20 and 25 breaths/min, and chamber pressures from 100 to 670 kPa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured end-tidal oxygen concentration (Fo₂) was compared to calculated end-tidal Fo₂. The largest average difference in end-tidal Fo₂during atmospheric pressure conditions was 0.63%-points with a 0.28%-point average difference during the whole test. During hyperbaric conditions with pressures ranging from 100 to 670 kPa, the largest average difference in Fo₂was 1.68%-points seen during compression from 100 kPa to 400 kPa and the average difference in Fo₂during the whole test was 0.29%-points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In combination with a breathing simulator simulating tidal breathing, the system can be used for dynamic continuous testing of breathing equipment with changes in VT, f, Vo2, and pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1139-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4047.2014","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4047.2014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: A major part of testing of rebreather apparatuses for underwater diving focuses on the oxygen dosage system.

Methods: A metabolic simulator for testing breathing apparatuses was built and evaluated. Oxygen consumption was achieved through catalytic combustion of propene. With an admixture of carbon dioxide in the propene fuel, the system allowed the respiratory exchange ratio to be set freely within human variability and also made it possible to increase test pressures above the condensation pressure of propene. The system was tested by breathing ambient air in a pressure chamber with oxygen uptake (Vo₂) ranging from 1-4 L · min(-1), tidal volume (VT) from 1-3 L, breathing frequency (f) of 20 and 25 breaths/min, and chamber pressures from 100 to 670 kPa.

Results: The measured end-tidal oxygen concentration (Fo₂) was compared to calculated end-tidal Fo₂. The largest average difference in end-tidal Fo₂during atmospheric pressure conditions was 0.63%-points with a 0.28%-point average difference during the whole test. During hyperbaric conditions with pressures ranging from 100 to 670 kPa, the largest average difference in Fo₂was 1.68%-points seen during compression from 100 kPa to 400 kPa and the average difference in Fo₂during the whole test was 0.29%-points.

Conclusion: In combination with a breathing simulator simulating tidal breathing, the system can be used for dynamic continuous testing of breathing equipment with changes in VT, f, Vo2, and pressure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种代谢模拟器,用于在高压条件下对呼吸装置进行无人测试。
背景:水下潜水用换气装置测试的主要内容是供氧系统。方法:建立用于呼吸设备测试的代谢模拟器并进行评价。氧消耗是通过催化燃烧丙烯实现的。在丙烯燃料中加入二氧化碳的混合物,该系统允许呼吸交换比在人的可变性范围内自由设置,并且还可以将测试压力提高到丙烯的冷凝压力之上。系统在吸氧(Vo₂)范围为1 ~ 4 L·min(-1),潮气量(VT)范围为1 ~ 3 L,呼吸频率(f)为20和25次/min,室压范围为100 ~ 670 kPa的压力室内呼吸环境空气。结果:测量的潮末氧浓度(Fo₂)与计算的潮末氧浓度(Fo₂)进行了比较。在大气压条件下,尾潮Fo₂的最大平均差值为0.63%,整个试验期间的平均差值为0.28%。在100 ~ 670 kPa的高压条件下,从100 kPa到400 kPa的压缩过程中,Fo₂的最大平均差值为1.68%,整个试验过程中Fo₂的平均差值为0.29%。结论:该系统与模拟潮汐呼吸的呼吸模拟器配合使用,可对呼吸设备的VT、f、Vo2、压力变化进行动态连续检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Chronic bacterial prostatitis. Carpe diem. Temperature changes in selected areas of body surface induced by systemic cryostimulation. Comparison of in-flight measures with predictions of a bio-mathematical fatigue model. Demographic and occupational predictors of neck pain in pilots: analysis and multinational comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1