Subcutaneous pathway diversion for peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage.

Tsutomu Sakurada, Takeshi Okamoto, Daisuke Oishi, Kenichiro Koitabashi, Shina Sueki, Nagayuki Kaneshiro, Katsuomi Matsui, Ryuto Nakazawa, Maki Yoshioka, Yusuke Konno, Yuichi Sato, Yugo Shibagaki, Tatsuya Chikaraishi, Kenjiro Kimura
{"title":"Subcutaneous pathway diversion for peritoneal dialysis catheter salvage.","authors":"Tsutomu Sakurada,&nbsp;Takeshi Okamoto,&nbsp;Daisuke Oishi,&nbsp;Kenichiro Koitabashi,&nbsp;Shina Sueki,&nbsp;Nagayuki Kaneshiro,&nbsp;Katsuomi Matsui,&nbsp;Ryuto Nakazawa,&nbsp;Maki Yoshioka,&nbsp;Yusuke Konno,&nbsp;Yuichi Sato,&nbsp;Yugo Shibagaki,&nbsp;Tatsuya Chikaraishi,&nbsp;Kenjiro Kimura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter-related infection is still is the most troublesome problem for continuation of PD without the need to switch to hemodialysis. We have been performing subcutaneous pathway diversion (SPD) as a surgical treatment for refractory exit-site and tunnel infection (ESTI). To clarify the efficacy and safety of SPD, we conducted a retrospective study. From August 2008 to August 2013, 30 SPDs were performed in 26 patients (16 men, 10 women; mean age: 58 +/- 13 years; 54% with diabetes; mean body mass index: 23.9 +/- 3.5 kg/ m2). The reasons for the SPDs were ESTI in 25 patients, and outer cuff extrusion in 1 patient. All patients resumed PD immediately after SPD, and the duration of hospitalization was 11.7 +/- 10.1 days. After SPD, one patient experienced a dialysate leak, and another patient experienced a mild subcutaneous hematoma. Another 4 patients developed exit-site infection (ESI) and underwent a second SPD. Of those 4 patients, 3 presented with another ESI unrelated to the first episode, and all developed an ESI after 6 months or more. The remaining 20 patients experienced no such complications. Furthermore, catheter survival after SPD was 17.4 +/- 13.4 months. To eradicate ESTTI we suggest that SPD, which does not require catheter removal or interruption of PD, is useful compared with the unroofing technique or catheter removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7361,"journal":{"name":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":"30 ","pages":"11-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter-related infection is still is the most troublesome problem for continuation of PD without the need to switch to hemodialysis. We have been performing subcutaneous pathway diversion (SPD) as a surgical treatment for refractory exit-site and tunnel infection (ESTI). To clarify the efficacy and safety of SPD, we conducted a retrospective study. From August 2008 to August 2013, 30 SPDs were performed in 26 patients (16 men, 10 women; mean age: 58 +/- 13 years; 54% with diabetes; mean body mass index: 23.9 +/- 3.5 kg/ m2). The reasons for the SPDs were ESTI in 25 patients, and outer cuff extrusion in 1 patient. All patients resumed PD immediately after SPD, and the duration of hospitalization was 11.7 +/- 10.1 days. After SPD, one patient experienced a dialysate leak, and another patient experienced a mild subcutaneous hematoma. Another 4 patients developed exit-site infection (ESI) and underwent a second SPD. Of those 4 patients, 3 presented with another ESI unrelated to the first episode, and all developed an ESI after 6 months or more. The remaining 20 patients experienced no such complications. Furthermore, catheter survival after SPD was 17.4 +/- 13.4 months. To eradicate ESTTI we suggest that SPD, which does not require catheter removal or interruption of PD, is useful compared with the unroofing technique or catheter removal.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜透析导管保留的皮下通路转移。
腹膜透析(PD)导管相关感染仍然是腹膜透析患者在不需要改用血液透析的情况下继续进行腹膜透析的最棘手的问题。我们一直在进行皮下通路转移(SPD)作为难治性出口部位和隧道感染(ESTI)的手术治疗。为了阐明SPD的有效性和安全性,我们进行了一项回顾性研究。2008年8月至2013年8月,对26例患者行30例spd,其中男性16例,女性10例;平均年龄:58±13岁;54%患有糖尿病;平均体重指数:23.9±3.5 kg/ m2)。造成spd的原因为ESTI 25例,外袖挤压1例。所有患者SPD后立即恢复PD,住院时间11.7 +/- 10.1天。SPD后,一名患者出现透析液泄漏,另一名患者出现轻度皮下血肿。另有4例患者发生出口部位感染(ESI),并进行了第二次SPD。在这4例患者中,3例出现与首次发作无关的另一次ESI,并且在6个月或更长时间后均出现ESI。其余20例患者没有出现此类并发症。此外,SPD后的导管生存时间为17.4 +/- 13.4个月。为了根除ESTTI,我们建议SPD,不需要拔除导管或中断PD,与无顶技术或拔除导管相比是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in Peritoneal Transport and Peritoneal Damage in Japanese Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis Using Neutral-pH Dialysate: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Two Centers. Maintaining Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: The Process of Incremental Prescription. Comparison of Various Scaling Parameters and Energy Expenditure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis Drop-Out. Accuracy of a Newly-Introduced Oscillometric Device for the Estimation of Arterial Stiffness Indices in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Preliminary Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1