Evaluation of a single-item screening question to detect limited health literacy in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Deepika Jain, Heena Sheth, Filitsa H Bender, Steven D Weisbord, Jamie A Green
{"title":"Evaluation of a single-item screening question to detect limited health literacy in peritoneal dialysis patients.","authors":"Deepika Jain,&nbsp;Heena Sheth,&nbsp;Filitsa H Bender,&nbsp;Steven D Weisbord,&nbsp;Jamie A Green","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have shown that a single-item question might be useful in identifying patients with limited health literacy. However, the utility of the approach has not been studied in patients receiving maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD). We assessed health literacy in a cohort of 31 PD patients by administering the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and a single-item health literacy (SHL) screening question \"How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?\" (Extremely, Quite a bit, Somewhat, A little bit, or Not at all). To determine the accuracy of the single-item question for detecting limited health literacy, we performed sensitivity and specificity analyses of the SHL and plotted the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve using the REALM as a reference standard. Using a cut-off of \"Somewhat\" or less confident, the sensitivity of the SHL for detecting limited health literacy was 80%, and the specificity was 88%. The positive likelihood ratio was 6.9. The SHL had an AUROC of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 1.00). Our results show that the SHL could be effective in detecting limited health literacy in PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7361,"journal":{"name":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":"30 ","pages":"27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have shown that a single-item question might be useful in identifying patients with limited health literacy. However, the utility of the approach has not been studied in patients receiving maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD). We assessed health literacy in a cohort of 31 PD patients by administering the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and a single-item health literacy (SHL) screening question "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" (Extremely, Quite a bit, Somewhat, A little bit, or Not at all). To determine the accuracy of the single-item question for detecting limited health literacy, we performed sensitivity and specificity analyses of the SHL and plotted the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve using the REALM as a reference standard. Using a cut-off of "Somewhat" or less confident, the sensitivity of the SHL for detecting limited health literacy was 80%, and the specificity was 88%. The positive likelihood ratio was 6.9. The SHL had an AUROC of 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 1.00). Our results show that the SHL could be effective in detecting limited health literacy in PD patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单项筛查问题对腹膜透析患者有限健康素养的评估。
研究表明,单项问题可能有助于识别卫生知识有限的患者。然而,该方法在接受维持性腹膜透析(PD)的患者中的应用尚未得到研究。我们通过实施成人医学素养快速评估(REALM)和单项目健康素养(SHL)筛查问题“你有多自信自己填写医疗表格?”来评估31名PD患者的健康素养。(非常,相当多,有些,一点点,或者根本没有)。为了确定单题检测有限健康素养的准确性,我们对SHL进行了敏感性和特异性分析,并以REALM作为参考标准绘制了接受者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积。使用“有点”或更少自信的截止值,SHL检测有限健康素养的灵敏度为80%,特异性为88%。阳性似然比为6.9。SHL的AUROC为0.79(95%可信区间:0.52 ~ 1.00)。我们的研究结果表明,SHL可以有效地检测PD患者的有限健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in Peritoneal Transport and Peritoneal Damage in Japanese Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis Using Neutral-pH Dialysate: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Two Centers. Maintaining Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: The Process of Incremental Prescription. Comparison of Various Scaling Parameters and Energy Expenditure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis Drop-Out. Accuracy of a Newly-Introduced Oscillometric Device for the Estimation of Arterial Stiffness Indices in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Preliminary Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1