Pre-procedure desmopressin acetate to reduce bleeding in renal failure: does it really work?

Nephron Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-10-23 DOI:10.1159/000362455
Seetha Radhakrishnan, Rahul Chanchlani, Bairbre Connolly, Valerie Langlois
{"title":"Pre-procedure desmopressin acetate to reduce bleeding in renal failure: does it really work?","authors":"Seetha Radhakrishnan,&nbsp;Rahul Chanchlani,&nbsp;Bairbre Connolly,&nbsp;Valerie Langlois","doi":"10.1159/000362455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used prior to procedures to minimize bleeding in patients with renal failure; however, there is little evidence to support this practice. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the practice of administration of DDAVP prior to procedures within our division and to determine the number of bleeding episodes for patients who received DDAVP compared to those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital records of patients who underwent renal biopsy or central line placement between April 2006 and March 2008 were reviewed. Patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) were identified and subcategorized into three groups: group A GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m(2), group B GFR 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and group C GFR 30-60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The number of bleeding events was noted in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found in the number of bleeding events between those who received and did not receive DDAVP overall and in each GFR group. A possible trend towards the benefit with treatment in group A was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant reduction in bleeding for those who received DDAVP which questions the validity of this practice. Patients with GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) may possibly derive benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"128 1-2","pages":"45-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000362455","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000362455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Desmopressin (DDAVP) is often used prior to procedures to minimize bleeding in patients with renal failure; however, there is little evidence to support this practice. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the practice of administration of DDAVP prior to procedures within our division and to determine the number of bleeding episodes for patients who received DDAVP compared to those who did not.

Methods: Hospital records of patients who underwent renal biopsy or central line placement between April 2006 and March 2008 were reviewed. Patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) were identified and subcategorized into three groups: group A GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m(2), group B GFR 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and group C GFR 30-60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The number of bleeding events was noted in each group.

Results: No significant difference was found in the number of bleeding events between those who received and did not receive DDAVP overall and in each GFR group. A possible trend towards the benefit with treatment in group A was observed.

Conclusion: There was no significant reduction in bleeding for those who received DDAVP which questions the validity of this practice. Patients with GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) may possibly derive benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前醋酸去氨加压素减少肾衰竭出血:它真的有效吗?
背景:去氨加压素(DDAVP)常用于肾衰竭患者手术前,以减少出血;然而,几乎没有证据支持这种做法。本研究的目的是评估我科在手术前给予DDAVP的做法,并确定接受DDAVP的患者与未接受DDAVP的患者的出血发作次数。方法:回顾2006年4月至2008年3月间接受肾活检或中央静脉置管的患者的住院记录。肾小球滤过率(GFR)患者结果:在总体和各GFR组中,接受和未接受DDAVP治疗的患者出血事件数量无显著差异。观察到A组治疗可能有获益的趋势。结论:接受DDAVP治疗的患者出血没有显著减少,这对这种做法的有效性提出了质疑。GFR患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron Clinical Practice
Nephron Clinical Practice 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Outcomes of In-Centre Haemodialysis Patients between the 1st and 2nd COVID-19 Outbreak in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: A UK Renal Registry Analysis Association of Serum Triglycerides and Renal Outcomes among 1.6 Million US Veterans Genetic Deletion of the Stromal Cell Marker CD248 (Endosialin) Protects against the Development of Renal Fibrosis Contents Vol. 128, 2014 Author Index Vol. 127, No. 1-4, 2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1