Bupivacaine Lozenge Compared with Lidocaine Spray as Topical Pharyngeal Anesthetic before Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2014-10-28 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.4137/CGast.S18019
Nesrin Salale, Charlotte Treldal, Stine Mogensen, Mette Rasmussen, Janne Petersen, Ove Andersen, Jette Jacobsen
{"title":"Bupivacaine Lozenge Compared with Lidocaine Spray as Topical Pharyngeal Anesthetic before Unsedated Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Nesrin Salale,&nbsp;Charlotte Treldal,&nbsp;Stine Mogensen,&nbsp;Mette Rasmussen,&nbsp;Janne Petersen,&nbsp;Ove Andersen,&nbsp;Jette Jacobsen","doi":"10.4137/CGast.S18019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) can induce patient discomfort, mainly due to a strong gag reflex. The aim was to assess the effect of a bupivacaine lozenge as topical pharyngeal anesthetic compared with standard treatment with a lidocaine spray before UGE. Ninety-nine adult outpatients undergoing unsedated diagnostic UGE were randomized to receive either a bupivacaine lozenge (L-group, n = 51) or lidocaine spray (S-group, n = 42). Primary objective was assessment of patient discomfort including acceptance of the gag reflex during UGE. The L-group assessed the discomfort significantly lower on a visual analog scale compared with the S-group (P = 0.02). There was also a significant difference in the four-point scale assessment of the gag reflex (P = 0.03). It was evaluated as acceptable by 49% in the L-group compared with 31% in the S-group. A bupivacaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine spray proved to be a superior option as topical pharyngeal anesthetic before an UGE. </p>","PeriodicalId":10382,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology","volume":"7 ","pages":"55-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/CGast.S18019","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/CGast.S18019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) can induce patient discomfort, mainly due to a strong gag reflex. The aim was to assess the effect of a bupivacaine lozenge as topical pharyngeal anesthetic compared with standard treatment with a lidocaine spray before UGE. Ninety-nine adult outpatients undergoing unsedated diagnostic UGE were randomized to receive either a bupivacaine lozenge (L-group, n = 51) or lidocaine spray (S-group, n = 42). Primary objective was assessment of patient discomfort including acceptance of the gag reflex during UGE. The L-group assessed the discomfort significantly lower on a visual analog scale compared with the S-group (P = 0.02). There was also a significant difference in the four-point scale assessment of the gag reflex (P = 0.03). It was evaluated as acceptable by 49% in the L-group compared with 31% in the S-group. A bupivacaine lozenge compared with a lidocaine spray proved to be a superior option as topical pharyngeal anesthetic before an UGE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布比卡因含片与利多卡因喷雾在非镇静上消化道内镜检查前作为局部咽麻醉剂的比较:一项随机对照试验。
非镇静上消化道内窥镜检查(UGE)可引起患者不适,主要是由于强烈的呕吐反射。目的是评估布比卡因含片作为局部咽麻醉剂的效果,并与UGE前使用利多卡因喷雾的标准治疗进行比较。99例接受非镇静诊断性UGE的成年门诊患者随机接受布比卡因含片(l组,n = 51)或利多卡因喷雾剂(s组,n = 42)。主要目的是评估患者不适,包括在UGE期间接受呕吐反射。与s组相比,l组在视觉模拟量表上评估的不适明显低于s组(P = 0.02)。呕吐反射的四分制评分也有显著差异(P = 0.03)。l组有49%的人认为可以接受,而s组只有31%。与利多卡因喷雾相比,布比卡因含片被证明是UGE前局部咽麻醉的更好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biodegradable Stents in Resistant Peptic Oesophageal Stricture: Is It the Right Way to Go? Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation? Understanding Therapeutic Concepts in Crohn's Disease. The Benefits of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Muscular and Functional Capacity of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial. Impact of Video Aid on Quality of Bowel Preparation Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1