Honey for acute cough in children

Olabisi Oduwole, Martin M Meremikwu, Angela Oyo-Ita, Ekong E Udoh
{"title":"Honey for acute cough in children","authors":"Olabisi Oduwole,&nbsp;Martin M Meremikwu,&nbsp;Angela Oyo-Ita,&nbsp;Ekong E Udoh","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children. Several remedies, including honey, have been used to alleviate cough symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the effectiveness of honey for acute cough in children in ambulatory settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (<i>The Cochrane Library</i> Issue 4, 2011) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1950 to December week 4, 2011); EMBASE (1990 to January 2012); CINAHL (1981 to January 2012); Web of Science (2000 to January 2012); AMED (1985 to January 2012); LILACS (1982 to January 2012); and CAB abstracts (2009 to January 2012).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\n \n <p>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing honey given alone, or in combination with antibiotics, versus nothing, placebo or other over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications to participants aged from two to 18 years for acute cough in ambulatory settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\n \n <p>Two review authors independently screened search results for eligible studies and extracted data on reported outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main results</h3>\n \n <p>We included two RCTs of high risk of bias involving 265 children. The studies compared the effect of honey with dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine and 'no treatment' on symptomatic relief of cough using the 7-point Likert scale.</p>\n \n <p>Honey was better than 'no treatment' in reducing frequency of cough (mean difference (MD) -1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.53 to -0.60; two studies; 154 participants). Moderate quality evidence suggests honey did not differ significantly from dextromethorphan in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.07; 95% CI -1.07 to 0.94; two studies; 149 participants). Low quality evidence suggests honey may be slightly better than diphenhydramine in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.57; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.24; one study; 80 participants).</p>\n \n <p>Adverse events included mild reactions (nervousness, insomnia and hyperactivity) experienced by seven children (9.3%) from the honey group and two (2.7%) from the dextromethorphan group; the difference was not significant (risk ratio (RR) 2.94; 95% Cl 0.74 to 11.71; two studies; 149 participants). Three children (7.5%) in the diphenhydramine group experienced somnolence (RR 0.14; 95% Cl 0.01 to 2.68; one study; 80 participants) but there was no significant difference between honey versus dextromethorphan or honey versus diphenhydramine. No adverse event was reported in the 'no treatment' group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Honey may be better than 'no treatment' and diphenhydramine in the symptomatic relief of cough but not better than dextromethorphan. There is no strong evidence for or against the use of honey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p><b>Honey for acute cough in children</b></p>\n \n <p>Cough is a cause for concern for parents and a major cause of outpatient visits in most settings for both children and adults. Cough can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep for parents and children. For this reason an immediate remedy is usually sought by both the caregiver and the recipient. Cochrane reviews have assessed the effectiveness of over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications, but none have studied honey as a cough relief. A systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of honey for reducing acute cough symptoms due to upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in children would be useful. A review of two small randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed that honey was moderately better than 'no treatment' for the relief of cough, reducing bothersome cough, improving quality of sleep for children and parents and reducing the severity of cough.</p>\n \n <p>This review included two small trials involving 265 children, aged two to 18 years. The effects of honey and dextromethorphan on symptomatic relief of cough, bothersome cough, and quality of sleep for both child and parent did not differ. Honey may be better than diphenhydramine for symptomatic relief of cough, reducing the severity of cough, and improving sleep quality for both parent and child. Dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine are both common ingredients in cough medications. Parents of seven children given honey and two given dextromethorphan reported their children suffered mild reactions from insomnia, hyperactivity and nervousness. Parents of three children in the diphenhydramine group reported somnolence. However, as with other medications, its benefit should be considered alongside the adverse effects. The limitation of this review update is that only two small studies with high risk of bias were included.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":"9 2","pages":"401-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1970","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background

Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children. Several remedies, including honey, have been used to alleviate cough symptoms.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of honey for acute cough in children in ambulatory settings.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1950 to December week 4, 2011); EMBASE (1990 to January 2012); CINAHL (1981 to January 2012); Web of Science (2000 to January 2012); AMED (1985 to January 2012); LILACS (1982 to January 2012); and CAB abstracts (2009 to January 2012).

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing honey given alone, or in combination with antibiotics, versus nothing, placebo or other over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications to participants aged from two to 18 years for acute cough in ambulatory settings.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently screened search results for eligible studies and extracted data on reported outcomes.

Main results

We included two RCTs of high risk of bias involving 265 children. The studies compared the effect of honey with dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine and 'no treatment' on symptomatic relief of cough using the 7-point Likert scale.

Honey was better than 'no treatment' in reducing frequency of cough (mean difference (MD) -1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.53 to -0.60; two studies; 154 participants). Moderate quality evidence suggests honey did not differ significantly from dextromethorphan in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.07; 95% CI -1.07 to 0.94; two studies; 149 participants). Low quality evidence suggests honey may be slightly better than diphenhydramine in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.57; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.24; one study; 80 participants).

Adverse events included mild reactions (nervousness, insomnia and hyperactivity) experienced by seven children (9.3%) from the honey group and two (2.7%) from the dextromethorphan group; the difference was not significant (risk ratio (RR) 2.94; 95% Cl 0.74 to 11.71; two studies; 149 participants). Three children (7.5%) in the diphenhydramine group experienced somnolence (RR 0.14; 95% Cl 0.01 to 2.68; one study; 80 participants) but there was no significant difference between honey versus dextromethorphan or honey versus diphenhydramine. No adverse event was reported in the 'no treatment' group.

Authors' conclusions

Honey may be better than 'no treatment' and diphenhydramine in the symptomatic relief of cough but not better than dextromethorphan. There is no strong evidence for or against the use of honey.

Plain Language Summary

Honey for acute cough in children

Cough is a cause for concern for parents and a major cause of outpatient visits in most settings for both children and adults. Cough can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep for parents and children. For this reason an immediate remedy is usually sought by both the caregiver and the recipient. Cochrane reviews have assessed the effectiveness of over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications, but none have studied honey as a cough relief. A systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of honey for reducing acute cough symptoms due to upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in children would be useful. A review of two small randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed that honey was moderately better than 'no treatment' for the relief of cough, reducing bothersome cough, improving quality of sleep for children and parents and reducing the severity of cough.

This review included two small trials involving 265 children, aged two to 18 years. The effects of honey and dextromethorphan on symptomatic relief of cough, bothersome cough, and quality of sleep for both child and parent did not differ. Honey may be better than diphenhydramine for symptomatic relief of cough, reducing the severity of cough, and improving sleep quality for both parent and child. Dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine are both common ingredients in cough medications. Parents of seven children given honey and two given dextromethorphan reported their children suffered mild reactions from insomnia, hyperactivity and nervousness. Parents of three children in the diphenhydramine group reported somnolence. However, as with other medications, its benefit should be considered alongside the adverse effects. The limitation of this review update is that only two small studies with high risk of bias were included.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蜂蜜治疗小儿急性咳嗽
背景:咳嗽引起家长的关注,是门诊就诊的主要原因。它会影响生活质量,引起焦虑,影响父母和孩子的睡眠。包括蜂蜜在内的几种疗法已被用来缓解咳嗽症状。目的探讨蜂蜜治疗小儿急性咳嗽的临床疗效。我们检索了Cochrane中央对照试验登记(Central) (Cochrane图书馆2011年第4期),其中包含Cochrane急性呼吸道感染组的专业登记;MEDLINE(1950年至2011年12月第4周);EMBASE(1990 - 2012年1月);(1981 - 2012年1月);Web of Science(2000 - 2012年1月);AMED(1985 - 2012年1月);丁香(1982年至2012年1月);和CAB摘要(2009年至2012年1月)。选择标准随机对照试验(rct)比较蜂蜜单独给予,或与抗生素联合给予,与不给予,安慰剂或其他非处方(OTC)止咳药相比,2至18岁的参与者在门诊环境中急性咳嗽。数据收集和分析两位综述作者独立筛选符合条件的研究的搜索结果,并提取报告结果的数据。我们纳入了两项高偏倚风险的随机对照试验,涉及265名儿童。这些研究用7分李克特量表比较了蜂蜜与右美沙芬、苯海拉明和“不治疗”对咳嗽症状缓解的效果。蜂蜜在减少咳嗽频率方面优于“未治疗”(平均差值(MD) -1.07;95%置信区间(CI) -1.53 ~ -0.60;两项研究;154名参与者)。中等质量的证据表明,蜂蜜与右美沙芬在减少咳嗽频率方面没有显著差异(MD -0.07;95% CI -1.07 ~ 0.94;两项研究;149名参与者)。低质量的证据表明,蜂蜜在减少咳嗽频率方面可能略优于苯海拉明(MD -0.57;95% CI -0.90 ~ -0.24;一项研究;80名参与者)。不良反应包括蜂蜜组的7名儿童(9.3%)和右美沙芬组的2名儿童(2.7%)出现轻度反应(紧张、失眠和多动症);差异无统计学意义(风险比(RR) 2.94;95% Cl = 0.74 ~ 11.71;两项研究;149名参与者)。苯海拉明组3例患儿(7.5%)出现嗜睡(RR 0.14;95% Cl 0.01 ~ 2.68;一项研究;80名参与者),但蜂蜜与右美沙芬或蜂蜜与苯海拉明之间没有显著差异。“未治疗”组无不良事件报告。作者的结论:蜂蜜在缓解咳嗽症状方面可能优于“不治疗”和苯海拉明,但不如右美沙芬。没有强有力的证据支持或反对使用蜂蜜。蜂蜜治疗儿童急性咳嗽咳嗽是引起家长关注的一个原因,也是大多数儿童和成人门诊就诊的主要原因。咳嗽会影响生活质量,引起焦虑,影响父母和孩子的睡眠。由于这个原因,护理者和接受者通常都寻求立即的补救措施。Cochrane综述评估了非处方(OTC)止咳药的有效性,但没有人研究蜂蜜作为止咳药。系统评价蜂蜜对减轻儿童上呼吸道感染(URTIs)引起的急性咳嗽症状的有效性将是有用的。一项对两项小型随机对照试验(RCTs)的回顾显示,蜂蜜在缓解咳嗽、减少烦人的咳嗽、改善儿童和父母的睡眠质量以及减轻咳嗽严重程度方面,比“不治疗”要好一些。本综述包括两项小型试验,涉及265名2至18岁的儿童。蜂蜜和右美沙芬对儿童和家长咳嗽症状的缓解、烦人的咳嗽和睡眠质量的影响没有差异。蜂蜜可能比苯海拉明更能缓解咳嗽症状,减轻咳嗽的严重程度,改善父母和孩子的睡眠质量。右美沙芬和苯海拉明都是止咳药的常见成分。 7名孩子服用蜂蜜,2名孩子服用右美沙芬,他们的父母报告说,他们的孩子出现了轻微的失眠、多动和紧张反应。在苯海拉明组,有三个孩子的父母报告嗜睡。然而,与其他药物一样,它的好处应该与副作用一起考虑。本综述更新的局限性在于仅纳入了两项具有高偏倚风险的小型研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials Pros and cons … Formoterol or salmeterol for asthma—should they be used as monotherapy? Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1