Ethnic Differences in Women's Emotional Reactions to Parental Non-Supportive Emotion Socialization.

IF 1.4 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1080/01494929.2014.897671
Esther M Leerkes, Andrew J Supple, Jessica A Gudmunson
{"title":"Ethnic Differences in Women's Emotional Reactions to Parental Non-Supportive Emotion Socialization.","authors":"Esther M Leerkes, Andrew J Supple, Jessica A Gudmunson","doi":"10.1080/01494929.2014.897671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence suggests that the association between parents' use of non-supportive emotion socialization practices and their children's subsequent negative emotional outcomes varies based on ethnicity. The goal of this study is to test the proposition that African American women interpret parental non-supportive emotion socialization practices less negatively than European American women. In this study, 251 European and African American women completed a measure on recalled feelings when their parents engaged in non-supportive emotion socialization practices during childhood. Results indicated that African American women reported feeling more loved and less hurt and ashamed than European American women when their parents enacted non-supportive emotion socialization practices such as ignoring, punishing, minimizing, and teasing them when distressed. Possible mechanisms for this difference and the need for additional research exploring ethnic differences in emotion socialization and its effects on adjustment are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51527,"journal":{"name":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01494929.2014.897671","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2014.897671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the association between parents' use of non-supportive emotion socialization practices and their children's subsequent negative emotional outcomes varies based on ethnicity. The goal of this study is to test the proposition that African American women interpret parental non-supportive emotion socialization practices less negatively than European American women. In this study, 251 European and African American women completed a measure on recalled feelings when their parents engaged in non-supportive emotion socialization practices during childhood. Results indicated that African American women reported feeling more loved and less hurt and ashamed than European American women when their parents enacted non-supportive emotion socialization practices such as ignoring, punishing, minimizing, and teasing them when distressed. Possible mechanisms for this difference and the need for additional research exploring ethnic differences in emotion socialization and its effects on adjustment are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性对父母非支持性情绪社会化反应的种族差异。
最近的证据表明,父母使用非支持性情绪社会化实践与孩子随后的负面情绪结果之间的联系因种族而异。本研究的目的是检验非裔美国妇女对父母非支持性情感社会化实践的负面理解是否比欧裔美国妇女少。在这项研究中,251名欧洲和非洲裔美国妇女完成了一项关于童年时期父母参与非支持性情感社会化实践时的回忆感受的测量。结果表明,当父母采取非支持性情感社会化措施,如忽视、惩罚、最小化和取笑她们时,非裔美国女性比欧裔美国女性感受到更多的爱,更少的伤害和羞耻。本文讨论了这种差异的可能机制,以及进一步研究情绪社会化的种族差异及其对适应的影响的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Marriage & Family Review publishes a mix of open submission articles as well as thematic issues that bring together the most current research, practice, advances in theory development, and applications of knowledge on a particular topic in the field. Marriage & Family Review has historically welcomed open submissions from numerous international scholars and will continue to do so. The journal will continue to welcome manuscripts that concern family strengths and premarital relationship development. Another continued emphasis will be research-based manuscripts concerning controversial issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Differences in the Effects of Five Disciplinary Techniques on Subsequent Externalizing Behavior Problems. "Best-Laid Plans": Barriers to Meeting Marital Timing Desires Over the Life Course. Rethinking and Revising Goode's Contribution to Global Family Change. Role of Marital Quality in Explaining Depressive Symptoms After Marital Termination Among Older Adults. Marriage Advantage in Subjective Well-Being: Causal Effect or Unmeasured Heterogeneity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1