FDG and Amyloid PET in Cognitively Normal Individuals at Risk for Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.

John Murray, Wai H Tsui, Yi Li, Pauline McHugh, Schantel Williams, Megan Cummings, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Lilja Solnes, Ricardo Osorio, Lidia Glodzik, Shankar Vallabhajosula, Alexander Drzezga, Satoshi Minoshima, Mony J de Leon, Lisa Mosconi
{"title":"FDG and Amyloid PET in Cognitively Normal Individuals at Risk for Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"John Murray,&nbsp;Wai H Tsui,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Pauline McHugh,&nbsp;Schantel Williams,&nbsp;Megan Cummings,&nbsp;Elizabeth Pirraglia,&nbsp;Lilja Solnes,&nbsp;Ricardo Osorio,&nbsp;Lidia Glodzik,&nbsp;Shankar Vallabhajosula,&nbsp;Alexander Drzezga,&nbsp;Satoshi Minoshima,&nbsp;Mony J de Leon,&nbsp;Lisa Mosconi","doi":"10.4236/ami.2014.42003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Having a parent affected by late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major risk factor for cognitively normal (NL) individuals. This study explores the potential of PET with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and the amyloid- <i>β</i> (A<i>β</i>) tracer <sup>11</sup>C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) for detection of individual risk in NL adults with AD-parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FDG- and PiB-PET was performed in 119 young to late-middle aged NL individuals including 80 NL with positive family history of AD (FH+) and 39 NL with negative family history of any dementia (FH-). The FH+ group included 50 subjects with maternal (FHm) and 30 with paternal family history (FHp). Individual FDG and PiB scans were Z scored on a voxel-wise basis relative to modality-specific reference databases using automated procedures and rated as positive or negative (+/-) for AD-typical abnormalities using predefined criteria. To determine the effect of age, the cohort was separated into younger (49 ± 9 y) and older (68 ± 5 y) groups relative to the median age (60 y).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among individuals of age >60 y, as compared to controls, NL FH+ showed a higher frequency of FDG+ scans vs. FH- (53% vs. 6% p < 0.003), and a trend for PiB+ scans (27% vs. 11%; p = 0.19). This effect was observed for both FHm and FHp groups. Among individuals of age ≤60 y, NL FHm showed a higher frequency of FDG+ scans (29%) compared to FH- (5%, p = 0.04) and a trend compared to FHp (11%) (p = 0.07), while the distribution of PiB+ scans was not different between groups. In both age cohorts, FDG+ scans were more frequent than PiB+ scans among NL FH+, especially FHm (p < 0.03). FDG-PET was a significant predictor of FH+ status. Classification according to PiB status was significantly less successful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated analysis of FDG- and PiB-PET demonstrates higher rates of abnormalities in at-risk FH+ vs FH- subjects, indicating potentially ongoing early AD-pathology in this population. The frequency of metabolic abnormalities was higher than that of A<i>β</i> pathology in the younger cohort, suggesting that neuronal dysfunction may precede major aggregated A<i>β</i> burden in young NL FH+. Longitudinal follow-up is required to determine if the observed abnormalities predict future AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":64843,"journal":{"name":"分子影像学(英文)","volume":"4 2","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270202/pdf/","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"分子影像学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ami.2014.42003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Having a parent affected by late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major risk factor for cognitively normal (NL) individuals. This study explores the potential of PET with 18F-FDG and the amyloid- β (Aβ) tracer 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) for detection of individual risk in NL adults with AD-parents.

Methods: FDG- and PiB-PET was performed in 119 young to late-middle aged NL individuals including 80 NL with positive family history of AD (FH+) and 39 NL with negative family history of any dementia (FH-). The FH+ group included 50 subjects with maternal (FHm) and 30 with paternal family history (FHp). Individual FDG and PiB scans were Z scored on a voxel-wise basis relative to modality-specific reference databases using automated procedures and rated as positive or negative (+/-) for AD-typical abnormalities using predefined criteria. To determine the effect of age, the cohort was separated into younger (49 ± 9 y) and older (68 ± 5 y) groups relative to the median age (60 y).

Results: Among individuals of age >60 y, as compared to controls, NL FH+ showed a higher frequency of FDG+ scans vs. FH- (53% vs. 6% p < 0.003), and a trend for PiB+ scans (27% vs. 11%; p = 0.19). This effect was observed for both FHm and FHp groups. Among individuals of age ≤60 y, NL FHm showed a higher frequency of FDG+ scans (29%) compared to FH- (5%, p = 0.04) and a trend compared to FHp (11%) (p = 0.07), while the distribution of PiB+ scans was not different between groups. In both age cohorts, FDG+ scans were more frequent than PiB+ scans among NL FH+, especially FHm (p < 0.03). FDG-PET was a significant predictor of FH+ status. Classification according to PiB status was significantly less successful.

Conclusions: Automated analysis of FDG- and PiB-PET demonstrates higher rates of abnormalities in at-risk FH+ vs FH- subjects, indicating potentially ongoing early AD-pathology in this population. The frequency of metabolic abnormalities was higher than that of Aβ pathology in the younger cohort, suggesting that neuronal dysfunction may precede major aggregated Aβ burden in young NL FH+. Longitudinal follow-up is required to determine if the observed abnormalities predict future AD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知正常个体迟发性阿尔茨海默病风险中的FDG和淀粉样PET
父母患有晚发性阿尔茨海默病(AD)是认知正常(NL)个体的主要危险因素。本研究探讨了PET与18F-FDG和淀粉样蛋白- β (Aβ)示踪剂11c -匹兹堡化合物B (PiB)在检测具有ad父母的NL成人个体风险方面的潜力。方法:对119例中青年NL患者进行FDG-和PiB-PET检测,其中80例AD家族史阳性(FH+), 39例痴呆家族史阴性(FH-)。FH+组包括50例母系家族史(FHm)和30例父系家族史(FHp)。使用自动化程序,相对于模式特定的参考数据库,对个体FDG和PiB扫描进行体素级Z评分,并使用预定义的标准将ad典型异常评为阳性或阴性(+/-)。为了确定年龄的影响,相对于中位年龄(60岁),将队列分为年轻组(49±9岁)和老年组(68±5岁)。结果:在年龄>60岁的个体中,与对照组相比,NL FH+显示FDG+扫描频率高于FH-(53%对6% p < 0.003), PiB+扫描趋势(27%对11%;P = 0.19)。FHm组和FHp组均观察到这种效应。在年龄≤60岁的人群中,NL FHm的FDG+扫描频率(29%)高于FH- (5%, p = 0.04),与FHp(11%)相比呈上升趋势(p = 0.07),而PiB+扫描在组间分布无差异。在两个年龄组中,NL FH+中FDG+扫描频率高于PiB+扫描频率,尤其是FHm (p < 0.03)。FDG-PET是FH+状态的重要预测因子。根据PiB状态进行分类的成功率明显较低。结论:FDG-和PiB-PET的自动分析显示,高危FH+与FH-受试者的异常率更高,表明该人群中可能存在早期ad病理。代谢异常的频率高于年轻队列中Aβ病理的频率,这表明神经元功能障碍可能先于年轻NL FH+的主要聚集Aβ负担。需要进行纵向随访,以确定观察到的异常是否可以预测未来的AD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inter-Observer Variability in the Interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT Scan according to PROMISE Criteria Tracking of Labelled Stem Cells Using Molecular MR Imaging in a Mouse Burn Model in Vivo as an Approach to Regenerative Medicine. Relevance and Compliance of Requests for Dental Panoramic Radiography Examination at Yaounde (Cameroon) Detection and Local Staging of Prostate Cancer by 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, Comparison with mpMRI and Histopathology Incidental Diagnosis of a Brown Tumor Mimicking Bone and Lung Metastasis during a Parathyroid Scintigraphy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1