Predictors of Rural Health Clinics Managers' Willingness to Join Accountable Care Organizations.

Thomas T H Wan, Maysoun Dimachkie Masri, Judith Ortiz
{"title":"Predictors of Rural Health Clinics Managers' Willingness to Join Accountable Care Organizations.","authors":"Thomas T H Wan,&nbsp;Maysoun Dimachkie Masri,&nbsp;Judith Ortiz","doi":"10.1108/S0275-495920140000032023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has facilitated the development of an innovative and integrated delivery care system, Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). It is timely, to identify how health care managers in rural health clinics are responding to the ACO model. This research examines RHC managers' perceived benefits and barriers for implementing ACOs from an organizational ecology perspective.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>A survey was conducted in Spring of 2012 covering the present RHC network working infrastructures - 1) Organizational social network; 2) organizational care delivery structure; 3) ACO knowledge, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers; 4) quality and disease management programs; and 5) health information technology (HIT) infrastructure. One thousand one hundred sixty clinics were surveyed in the United States. They cover eight southeastern states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and California. A total of ninety-one responses were received.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>RHC managers' personal perceptions on ACO's benefits and knowledge level explained the most variance in their willingness to join ACOs. Individual perceptions appear to be more influential than organizational and context factors in the predictive analysis.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>The study is primarily focused in the Southeastern region of the U.S. The generalizability is limited to this region. The predictors of rural health clinics' participation in ACOs are germane to guide the development of organizational strategies for enhancing the general knowledge about the innovativeness of delivering coordinated care and containing health care costs inspired by the Affordable Care Act.</p><p><strong>Originality/value of paper: </strong>Rural health clinics are lagged behind the growth curve of ACO adoption. The diffusion of new knowledge about pros and cons of ACO is essential to reinforce the health care reform in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"32 ","pages":"259-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0275-495920140000032023","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in the sociology of health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920140000032023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has facilitated the development of an innovative and integrated delivery care system, Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). It is timely, to identify how health care managers in rural health clinics are responding to the ACO model. This research examines RHC managers' perceived benefits and barriers for implementing ACOs from an organizational ecology perspective.

Methodology/approach: A survey was conducted in Spring of 2012 covering the present RHC network working infrastructures - 1) Organizational social network; 2) organizational care delivery structure; 3) ACO knowledge, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers; 4) quality and disease management programs; and 5) health information technology (HIT) infrastructure. One thousand one hundred sixty clinics were surveyed in the United States. They cover eight southeastern states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) and California. A total of ninety-one responses were received.

Findings: RHC managers' personal perceptions on ACO's benefits and knowledge level explained the most variance in their willingness to join ACOs. Individual perceptions appear to be more influential than organizational and context factors in the predictive analysis.

Research limitations/implications: The study is primarily focused in the Southeastern region of the U.S. The generalizability is limited to this region. The predictors of rural health clinics' participation in ACOs are germane to guide the development of organizational strategies for enhancing the general knowledge about the innovativeness of delivering coordinated care and containing health care costs inspired by the Affordable Care Act.

Originality/value of paper: Rural health clinics are lagged behind the growth curve of ACO adoption. The diffusion of new knowledge about pros and cons of ACO is essential to reinforce the health care reform in the United States.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村卫生诊所管理者加入负责任医疗组织意愿的预测因素。
目的:实施病人保护和负担得起的医疗法案促进了创新和综合交付医疗系统的发展,负责任的医疗组织(ACOs)。确定农村卫生诊所的卫生保健管理人员对ACO模式的反应是及时的。本研究从组织生态学的角度考察了企业责任管理人员实施ACOs的感知利益和障碍。方法/方法:2012年春季进行了一项调查,涵盖了目前RHC网络的工作基础设施:1)组织社会网络;2)组织护理服务结构;3) ACO知识、感知利益和感知障碍;4)质量和疾病管理方案;5)卫生信息技术(HIT)基础设施。在美国调查了一千一百六十家诊所。它们覆盖了美国东南部的八个州(阿拉巴马州、佛罗里达州、佐治亚州、肯塔基州、密西西比州、北卡罗来纳州、南卡罗来纳州和田纳西州)和加利福尼亚州。共收到91份答复。研究发现:RHC管理者对代理公司的利益和知识水平的个人认知解释了他们加入代理公司意愿的最大差异。在预测分析中,个体感知似乎比组织和环境因素更有影响力。研究局限/启示:该研究主要集中在美国东南部地区,可泛化性仅限于该地区。农村卫生诊所参与ACOs的预测因素与指导制定组织战略密切相关,这些战略旨在提高对《平价医疗法案》所激发的提供协调医疗和控制医疗成本的创新性的一般认识。论文的原创性/价值:农村卫生所落后于ACO采用的增长曲线。传播关于ACO的利弊的新知识对于加强美国的医疗改革至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health and Health Care Inequities, Infectious Diseases and Social Factors Trends in Health Disparities of Rural Latinos Pre- and Post-Accountable Care Organization Implementation. Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Other Social Characteristics as Factors in Health and Health Care Disparities Prelims Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1