[Application of basophil activation test in diagnosing aspirin hypersensitivity].

Marika Gawinowska, Krzysztof Specjalski, Marta Chełmińska, Jakub Łata, Maciej Zieliński
{"title":"[Application of basophil activation test in diagnosing aspirin hypersensitivity].","authors":"Marika Gawinowska,&nbsp;Krzysztof Specjalski,&nbsp;Marta Chełmińska,&nbsp;Jakub Łata,&nbsp;Maciej Zieliński","doi":"10.5603/PiAP.2015.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the face of increasing prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions, introduction of effective, reliable and safe methods plays a crucial role in their diagnosing. Among the currently available laboratory (in vitro) methods is basophil activation test (BAT). It is a flow- cytometry based assay that allows to identificate in the blood sample basophils and additionally to asses the degree of cell activation after exposure to an antigen. The most common superficial identification markers are CD63 and CD203c, which increase in number after activation. Basophil actvation test can be applied to confirm diagnosis of allergy to Hymenoptera venoms, food, pollens and hypersensitivity to drugs. The aim of present paper is to present theoretical methods of this test as well as its pros and cons. We focus also on presentation of clinical case where BAT seemed to be a necessary addition to a routine diagnostic pathway. We present a case of identification of the culprit drug which caused an anaphylactic reaction. </p>","PeriodicalId":20258,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonologia i alergologia polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonologia i alergologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/PiAP.2015.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the face of increasing prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions, introduction of effective, reliable and safe methods plays a crucial role in their diagnosing. Among the currently available laboratory (in vitro) methods is basophil activation test (BAT). It is a flow- cytometry based assay that allows to identificate in the blood sample basophils and additionally to asses the degree of cell activation after exposure to an antigen. The most common superficial identification markers are CD63 and CD203c, which increase in number after activation. Basophil actvation test can be applied to confirm diagnosis of allergy to Hymenoptera venoms, food, pollens and hypersensitivity to drugs. The aim of present paper is to present theoretical methods of this test as well as its pros and cons. We focus also on presentation of clinical case where BAT seemed to be a necessary addition to a routine diagnostic pathway. We present a case of identification of the culprit drug which caused an anaphylactic reaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验在阿司匹林超敏反应诊断中的应用]。
面对日益普遍的超敏反应,引入有效、可靠和安全的方法在其诊断中起着至关重要的作用。目前可用的实验室(体外)方法是嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验(BAT)。这是一种基于流式细胞术的检测方法,可以识别血液样本中的嗜碱性粒细胞,并评估暴露于抗原后细胞活化的程度。最常见的表面识别标记是CD63和CD203c,它们在激活后数量增加。嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验可用于膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏、食物过敏、花粉过敏和药物过敏的诊断。本文的目的是介绍该测试的理论方法及其优点和缺点。我们还关注临床病例的介绍,其中BAT似乎是常规诊断途径的必要补充。我们提出了一个病例的罪魁祸首药物的鉴定,引起了过敏反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Systemic mastocytosis]. The clinical differences of asthma in patients with molds allergy. Tumor necrosis factor alpha as an asthma biomarker in early childhood. Prognostic value of TH1/TH2 cytokines in infants with wheezing in a three year follow-up study. Fungal infection of cystic fibrosis patients - single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1