Local Health Department Collaborative Capacity to Improve Population Health.

Hector P Rodriguez, Jeffrey Mac McCullough, Charleen Hsuan
{"title":"Local Health Department Collaborative Capacity to Improve Population Health.","authors":"Hector P Rodriguez,&nbsp;Jeffrey Mac McCullough,&nbsp;Charleen Hsuan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Local health departments (LHDs) can more effectively develop and strengthen community health partnerships when leaders focus on building partnership collaborative capacity (PCC), including a multisector infrastructure for population health improvement. Using the 2008 National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) Profile survey, we constructed an overall measure of LHD PCC comprised of the five dimensions: outcomes-based advocacy, vision-focus balance, systems orientation, infrastructure development, and community linkages. We conducted a series of regression analyses to examine the extent to which LHD characteristics and contextual factors were related to PCC. The most developed PCC dimension was vision-focus balance, while infrastructure development and community linkages were the least developed. In multivariate analyses, LHDs that were locally governed (rather than governed by the state), LHDs without local boards of health, and LHDs providing a wider range of clinical services had greater overall PCC. LHDs serving counties with higher uninsurance rates had lower overall PCC. LHDs with lower per capita expenditures had less developed partnership infrastructure. LHD discontinuation of clinical services may result in an erosion of collaborative capacity unless LHD partnerships also shift their foci from services delivery to population health improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":73100,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in public health services & systems research","volume":"3 4","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286878/pdf/nihms644498.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in public health services & systems research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local health departments (LHDs) can more effectively develop and strengthen community health partnerships when leaders focus on building partnership collaborative capacity (PCC), including a multisector infrastructure for population health improvement. Using the 2008 National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) Profile survey, we constructed an overall measure of LHD PCC comprised of the five dimensions: outcomes-based advocacy, vision-focus balance, systems orientation, infrastructure development, and community linkages. We conducted a series of regression analyses to examine the extent to which LHD characteristics and contextual factors were related to PCC. The most developed PCC dimension was vision-focus balance, while infrastructure development and community linkages were the least developed. In multivariate analyses, LHDs that were locally governed (rather than governed by the state), LHDs without local boards of health, and LHDs providing a wider range of clinical services had greater overall PCC. LHDs serving counties with higher uninsurance rates had lower overall PCC. LHDs with lower per capita expenditures had less developed partnership infrastructure. LHD discontinuation of clinical services may result in an erosion of collaborative capacity unless LHD partnerships also shift their foci from services delivery to population health improvement.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方卫生部门改善人口健康的协作能力。
如果领导人注重建立伙伴合作能力,包括改善人口健康的多部门基础设施,地方卫生部门就能更有效地发展和加强社区卫生伙伴关系。利用2008年全国县和市卫生官员协会(NACCHO)概况调查,我们构建了LHD PCC的总体衡量标准,包括五个维度:基于结果的倡导、愿景重点平衡、系统导向、基础设施发展和社区联系。我们进行了一系列回归分析,以检验LHD特征和背景因素与PCC的关系程度。最发达的PCC方面是愿景重点平衡,而基础设施发展和社区联系是最不发达的。在多变量分析中,由地方管理(而不是由国家管理)的lhd,没有地方卫生委员会的lhd,以及提供更广泛临床服务的lhd的总体PCC更高。服务于未参保率较高的县的lhd总体PCC较低。人均支出较低的低收入国家的伙伴关系基础设施较不发达。LHD停止临床服务可能导致协作能力的削弱,除非LHD伙伴关系也将其重点从提供服务转向改善人口健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Sectoral Partnerships and Patient-Engagement Strategies in Accountable Care Organizations. Translating Research into Action: A Framework for Research That Supports Advances In Population Health. Translating Research into Action: A Framework for Research That Supports Advances In Population Health. Sharing Local Public Health Services Across Jurisdictions: Comparing Practice in 2012 and 2014. Economic Evaluation of Fungal Meningitis Outbreak Response in New River Valley: Local Health Department Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1