Physical Activity, Mediterranean Diet and Biomarkers-Assessed Risk of Alzheimer's: A Multi-Modality Brain Imaging Study.

Dawn C Matthews, Michelle Davies, John Murray, Schantel Williams, Wai H Tsui, Yi Li, Randolph D Andrews, Ana Lukic, Pauline McHugh, Shankar Vallabhajosula, Mony J de Leon, Lisa Mosconi
{"title":"Physical Activity, Mediterranean Diet and Biomarkers-Assessed Risk of Alzheimer's: A Multi-Modality Brain Imaging Study.","authors":"Dawn C Matthews,&nbsp;Michelle Davies,&nbsp;John Murray,&nbsp;Schantel Williams,&nbsp;Wai H Tsui,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Randolph D Andrews,&nbsp;Ana Lukic,&nbsp;Pauline McHugh,&nbsp;Shankar Vallabhajosula,&nbsp;Mony J de Leon,&nbsp;Lisa Mosconi","doi":"10.4236/ami.2014.44006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increased physical activity and higher adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet (MeDi) have been independently associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Their association has not been investigated with the use of biomarkers. This study examines whether, among cognitively normal (NL) individuals, those who are less physically active and show lower MeDi adherence have brain biomarker abnormalities consistent with AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five NL individuals (age 54 ± 11, 71% women) with complete leisure time physical activity (LTA), dietary information, and cross-sectional 3D T1-weigthed MRI, <sup>11</sup>C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans were examined. Voxel-wise multivariate partial least square (PLS) regression was used to examine the effects of LTA, MeDi and their interaction on brain biomarkers. Age, gender, ethnicity, education, caloric intake, BMI, family history of AD, Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, presence of hypertension and insulin resistance were examined as confounds. Subjects were dichotomized into more and less physically active (LTA+ vs. LTA-; n = 21 vs. 24), and into higher vs. lower MeDi adherence groups (n = 18 vs. 27) using published scoring methods. Spatial patterns of brain biomarkers that represented the optimal association between the images and the groups were generated for all modalities using voxel-wise multivariate Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups were comparable for clinical and neuropsychological measures. Independent effects of LTA and MeDi factors were observed in AD-vulnerable brain regions for all modalities (p < 0.001). Increased AD-burden (in particular higher A<i>β</i> load and lower glucose metabolism) were observed in LTA- compared to LTA+ subjects, and in MeDi- as compared to MeDi+ subjects. A gradient effect was observed for all modalities so that LTA-/MeDi- subjects had the highest and LTA+/MeDi+ subjects had the lowest AD-burden (p < 0.001), although the LTA × MeDi interaction was significant only for FDG measures (p < 0.03). Adjusting for covariates did not attenuate these relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower physical activity and MeDi adherence were associated with increased brain AD-burden among NL individuals, indicating that lifestyle factors may modulate AD risk. Studies with larger samples and longitudinal evaluations are needed to determine the predictive power of the observed associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":64843,"journal":{"name":"分子影像学(英文)","volume":"4 4","pages":"43-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294269/pdf/","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"分子影像学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ami.2014.44006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Increased physical activity and higher adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet (MeDi) have been independently associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Their association has not been investigated with the use of biomarkers. This study examines whether, among cognitively normal (NL) individuals, those who are less physically active and show lower MeDi adherence have brain biomarker abnormalities consistent with AD.

Methods: Forty-five NL individuals (age 54 ± 11, 71% women) with complete leisure time physical activity (LTA), dietary information, and cross-sectional 3D T1-weigthed MRI, 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans were examined. Voxel-wise multivariate partial least square (PLS) regression was used to examine the effects of LTA, MeDi and their interaction on brain biomarkers. Age, gender, ethnicity, education, caloric intake, BMI, family history of AD, Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, presence of hypertension and insulin resistance were examined as confounds. Subjects were dichotomized into more and less physically active (LTA+ vs. LTA-; n = 21 vs. 24), and into higher vs. lower MeDi adherence groups (n = 18 vs. 27) using published scoring methods. Spatial patterns of brain biomarkers that represented the optimal association between the images and the groups were generated for all modalities using voxel-wise multivariate Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.

Results: Groups were comparable for clinical and neuropsychological measures. Independent effects of LTA and MeDi factors were observed in AD-vulnerable brain regions for all modalities (p < 0.001). Increased AD-burden (in particular higher Aβ load and lower glucose metabolism) were observed in LTA- compared to LTA+ subjects, and in MeDi- as compared to MeDi+ subjects. A gradient effect was observed for all modalities so that LTA-/MeDi- subjects had the highest and LTA+/MeDi+ subjects had the lowest AD-burden (p < 0.001), although the LTA × MeDi interaction was significant only for FDG measures (p < 0.03). Adjusting for covariates did not attenuate these relationships.

Conclusion: Lower physical activity and MeDi adherence were associated with increased brain AD-burden among NL individuals, indicating that lifestyle factors may modulate AD risk. Studies with larger samples and longitudinal evaluations are needed to determine the predictive power of the observed associations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育活动,地中海饮食和生物标志物评估阿尔茨海默氏症的风险:一项多模态脑成像研究。
增加体力活动和提高地中海型饮食(MeDi)的依从性与降低阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险独立相关。它们之间的关联尚未通过生物标志物的使用进行调查。这项研究调查了认知正常(NL)个体中,那些身体活动较少、依从性较低的人是否有与AD一致的大脑生物标志物异常。方法:对45例NL患者(年龄54±11,71%为女性)进行完整的闲暇时间体力活动(LTA),饮食信息,横剖面3D t1加权MRI, 11c -匹兹堡化合物B (PiB)和18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)扫描。采用体素多元偏最小二乘(PLS)回归分析LTA、MeDi及其相互作用对脑生物标志物的影响。年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、热量摄入、BMI、AD家族史、载脂蛋白E (APOE)基因型、是否存在高血压和胰岛素抵抗作为混杂因素进行检查。受试者被分为多运动和少运动两组(LTA+ vs. LTA-;n = 21对24),并采用已发表的评分方法分为高依从组和低依从组(n = 18对27)。使用体素多变量偏最小二乘(PLS)回归,为所有模式生成了代表图像和组之间最佳关联的脑生物标志物的空间模式。结果:两组在临床和神经心理指标上具有可比性。LTA和MeDi因素在所有ad易感脑区均观察到独立影响(p < 0.001)。与LTA+组相比,LTA-组ad负荷增加(特别是Aβ负荷增加和糖代谢降低),与MeDi+组相比,MeDi-组ad负荷增加。所有模式均观察到梯度效应,因此LTA-/MeDi-受试者ad负担最高,LTA+/MeDi+受试者ad负担最低(p < 0.001),尽管LTA × MeDi相互作用仅在FDG测量中显著(p < 0.03)。调整协变量并没有减弱这些关系。结论:在NL个体中,较低的体力活动和medii依从性与大脑AD负担增加有关,表明生活方式因素可能调节AD风险。需要更大样本的研究和纵向评估来确定观察到的关联的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inter-Observer Variability in the Interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT Scan according to PROMISE Criteria Tracking of Labelled Stem Cells Using Molecular MR Imaging in a Mouse Burn Model in Vivo as an Approach to Regenerative Medicine. Relevance and Compliance of Requests for Dental Panoramic Radiography Examination at Yaounde (Cameroon) Detection and Local Staging of Prostate Cancer by 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, Comparison with mpMRI and Histopathology Incidental Diagnosis of a Brown Tumor Mimicking Bone and Lung Metastasis during a Parathyroid Scintigraphy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1