Innovative health systems projects.

Michael Green, Mansoor Amad, Mark Woodland
{"title":"Innovative health systems projects.","authors":"Michael Green,&nbsp;Mansoor Amad,&nbsp;Mark Woodland","doi":"10.1111/tct.12218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residency programmes struggle with the systems-based practice and improvement competency promoted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The development of Innovative Health Systems Projects (IHelP) was driven by the need for better systems-based initiatives at an institutional level. Our objective was to develop a novel approach that successfully incorporates systems-based practice in our Graduate Medical Education (GME) programmes, while tracking our impact on health care delivery as an academic medical centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We started the IHelP programme as a 'volunteer initiative' in 2010. A detailed description of the definition, development and implementation of the IHelP programme, along with our experience of the first year, is described. Residents, fellows and faculty mentors all played an important role in establishing the foundation of this initiative. Following the positive response, we have now incorporated IHelP into all curricula as a graduating requirement. IHelP has promoted scholarly activity and faculty mentorship, [and] has improved aspects of patient care and safety</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 residents and fellows, representing 26 specialties, participated. We reviewed 145 projects that addressed topics ranging from administrative and departmental improvements to clinical care algorithms. The projects by area of focus were: patient care - clinical care, 38 per cent; patient care - quality, 27 per cent; resident education, 21 per cent; and a cumulative 16 per cent among pharmacy, department activities, patient education, medical records and clinical facility.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We are pleased with the results of our first year of incorporating a systems-based improvement programme into the GME programmes. This initiative has promoted scholarly activity and faculty mentorship, has improved aspects of patient care and safety, and has led to the development of many practical innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"12 1","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12218","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Residency programmes struggle with the systems-based practice and improvement competency promoted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The development of Innovative Health Systems Projects (IHelP) was driven by the need for better systems-based initiatives at an institutional level. Our objective was to develop a novel approach that successfully incorporates systems-based practice in our Graduate Medical Education (GME) programmes, while tracking our impact on health care delivery as an academic medical centre.

Methods: We started the IHelP programme as a 'volunteer initiative' in 2010. A detailed description of the definition, development and implementation of the IHelP programme, along with our experience of the first year, is described. Residents, fellows and faculty mentors all played an important role in establishing the foundation of this initiative. Following the positive response, we have now incorporated IHelP into all curricula as a graduating requirement. IHelP has promoted scholarly activity and faculty mentorship, [and] has improved aspects of patient care and safety

Results: A total of 123 residents and fellows, representing 26 specialties, participated. We reviewed 145 projects that addressed topics ranging from administrative and departmental improvements to clinical care algorithms. The projects by area of focus were: patient care - clinical care, 38 per cent; patient care - quality, 27 per cent; resident education, 21 per cent; and a cumulative 16 per cent among pharmacy, department activities, patient education, medical records and clinical facility.

Discussion: We are pleased with the results of our first year of incorporating a systems-based improvement programme into the GME programmes. This initiative has promoted scholarly activity and faculty mentorship, has improved aspects of patient care and safety, and has led to the development of many practical innovations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新卫生系统项目。
背景:住院医师项目与研究生医学教育认证委员会所提倡的基于系统的实践和提高能力的斗争。创新卫生系统项目(IHelP)的发展是由机构一级需要更好的基于系统的举措推动的。我们的目标是开发一种新颖的方法,成功地将基于系统的实践纳入我们的研究生医学教育(GME)项目,同时跟踪我们作为学术医疗中心对医疗保健服务的影响。方法:我们在2010年启动了IHelP项目,作为一项“志愿者倡议”。详细描述了IHelP项目的定义、开发和实施,以及我们第一年的经验。住院医师、研究员和教师导师都在建立这一倡议的基础方面发挥了重要作用。在得到积极回应后,我们现在将IHelP作为毕业要求纳入所有课程。IHelP促进了学术活动和教师指导,[并且]改善了患者护理和安全的各个方面。结果:共有123名住院医生和研究员参与,代表26个专业。我们回顾了145个项目,涉及的主题从行政和部门改进到临床护理算法。按重点领域分列的项目是:病人护理——临床护理,38%;病人护理——质量,27%;居民教育,21%;在药房、科室活动、病人教育、医疗记录和临床设施方面累计增加16%。讨论:我们对第一年将基于系统的改进计划纳入GME计划的结果感到满意。这一举措促进了学术活动和教师指导,改善了患者护理和安全的各个方面,并导致了许多实际创新的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterising ableism to promote inclusivity within clinical teaching. When technology fails during simulation: Time for reflection? 'Comfort Club': Student-run volunteering on the neonatal intensive care unit. The hidden pandemic: Student perspectives on domestic violence education. Learning and satisfaction in a student-led clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1