How do We Manage Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with CKD and ESRD?

Q3 Medicine Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2014-12-01 Epub Date: 2014-12-31 DOI:10.5049/EBP.2014.12.2.41
Hoon Young Choi, Hyeong Cheon Park, Sung Kyu Ha
{"title":"How do We Manage Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with CKD and ESRD?","authors":"Hoon Young Choi,&nbsp;Hyeong Cheon Park,&nbsp;Sung Kyu Ha","doi":"10.5049/EBP.2014.12.2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been shown to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. In addition, patients with pre-dialysis CKD appear to be more likely to die of heart disease than of kidney disease. CKD accelerates coronary artery atherosclerosis by several mechanisms, notably hypertension and dyslipidemia, both of which are known risk factors for coronary artery disease. In addition, CKD alters calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, resulting in hypercalcemia and vascular calcification, including the coronary arteries. Mortality of patients on long-term dialysis therapy is high, with age-adjusted mortality rates of about 25% annually. Because the majority of deaths are caused by cardiovascular disease, routine cardiac catheterization of new dialysis patients was proposed as a means of improving the identification and treatment of high-risk patients. However, clinicians may be uncomfortable exposing asymptomatic patients to such invasive procedures like cardiac catheterization, thus noninvasive cardiac risk stratification was investigated widely as a more palatable alternative to routine diagnostic catheterization. The effective management of coronary artery disease is of paramount importance in uremic patients. The applicability of diagnostic, preventive, and treatment modalities developed in nonuremic populations to patients with kidney failure cannot necessarily be extrapolated from clinical studies in non-kidney failure populations. Noninvasive diagnostic testing in uremic patients is less accurate than in nonuremic populations. Initial data suggest that dobutamine echocardiography may be the preferred diagnostic method. PCI with stenting is a less favorable alternative to CABG, however, it has a faster recovery time, reduced invasiveness, and no overall mortality difference in nondiabetic and non-CKD patients compared with CABG. CABG is associated with reduced repeat revascularizations, greater relief of angina, and increased long term survival. However, CABG is associated with a higher incidence of post-operative risks. The treatment chosen for each patient should be an individualized decision based upon numerous risk factors. CKD is associated with higher rates of CAD, with 44% of all-cause mortality attributable to cardiac disease and about 20% from acute MI. Optimal treatment including aggressive lifestyle modifications and concomitant medical therapy should be implemented in all patients to maximize benefits from either PCI or CABG. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with newer second or third generation DES and bioabsorbable DES are necessary to determine if PCI may be non-inferior to CABG in the future. </p>","PeriodicalId":35352,"journal":{"name":"Electrolyte and Blood Pressure","volume":"12 2","pages":"41-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5049/EBP.2014.12.2.41","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrolyte and Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5049/EBP.2014.12.2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been shown to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. In addition, patients with pre-dialysis CKD appear to be more likely to die of heart disease than of kidney disease. CKD accelerates coronary artery atherosclerosis by several mechanisms, notably hypertension and dyslipidemia, both of which are known risk factors for coronary artery disease. In addition, CKD alters calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, resulting in hypercalcemia and vascular calcification, including the coronary arteries. Mortality of patients on long-term dialysis therapy is high, with age-adjusted mortality rates of about 25% annually. Because the majority of deaths are caused by cardiovascular disease, routine cardiac catheterization of new dialysis patients was proposed as a means of improving the identification and treatment of high-risk patients. However, clinicians may be uncomfortable exposing asymptomatic patients to such invasive procedures like cardiac catheterization, thus noninvasive cardiac risk stratification was investigated widely as a more palatable alternative to routine diagnostic catheterization. The effective management of coronary artery disease is of paramount importance in uremic patients. The applicability of diagnostic, preventive, and treatment modalities developed in nonuremic populations to patients with kidney failure cannot necessarily be extrapolated from clinical studies in non-kidney failure populations. Noninvasive diagnostic testing in uremic patients is less accurate than in nonuremic populations. Initial data suggest that dobutamine echocardiography may be the preferred diagnostic method. PCI with stenting is a less favorable alternative to CABG, however, it has a faster recovery time, reduced invasiveness, and no overall mortality difference in nondiabetic and non-CKD patients compared with CABG. CABG is associated with reduced repeat revascularizations, greater relief of angina, and increased long term survival. However, CABG is associated with a higher incidence of post-operative risks. The treatment chosen for each patient should be an individualized decision based upon numerous risk factors. CKD is associated with higher rates of CAD, with 44% of all-cause mortality attributable to cardiac disease and about 20% from acute MI. Optimal treatment including aggressive lifestyle modifications and concomitant medical therapy should be implemented in all patients to maximize benefits from either PCI or CABG. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with newer second or third generation DES and bioabsorbable DES are necessary to determine if PCI may be non-inferior to CABG in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们如何处理CKD和ESRD患者的冠状动脉疾病?
慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)已被证明是心血管事件的独立危险因素。此外,透析前CKD患者似乎更容易死于心脏病而不是肾脏疾病。CKD通过多种机制加速冠状动脉粥样硬化,特别是高血压和血脂异常,这两者都是已知的冠状动脉疾病的危险因素。此外,CKD改变钙和磷的稳态,导致高钙血症和血管钙化,包括冠状动脉。长期透析治疗患者的死亡率很高,每年的年龄调整死亡率约为25%。由于大多数死亡是由心血管疾病引起的,因此建议对新透析患者进行常规心导管检查,以提高对高危患者的识别和治疗。然而,临床医生可能不愿意让无症状的患者接受诸如心导管插入术这样的侵入性手术,因此,无创心脏风险分层被广泛研究,作为常规诊断性导管插入术的一种更合适的选择。冠状动脉疾病的有效治疗对尿毒症患者至关重要。在非尿毒症人群中开发的诊断、预防和治疗模式对肾衰竭患者的适用性不能从非肾衰竭人群的临床研究中推断出来。无创诊断检测在尿毒症患者中的准确性低于非尿毒症人群。初步资料显示,多巴酚丁胺超声心动图可能是首选的诊断方法。与CABG相比,PCI +支架置入是一种较差的选择,然而,与CABG相比,它具有更快的恢复时间,更小的侵袭性,并且在非糖尿病和非ckd患者中没有总体死亡率差异。冠脉搭桥可减少重复血运重建,缓解心绞痛,提高长期生存率。然而,CABG与较高的术后风险发生率相关。为每个病人选择的治疗应该是基于众多风险因素的个体化决定。CKD与较高的冠心病发病率相关,44%的全因死亡率可归因于心脏病,约20%的全因死亡率可归因于急性心肌梗死。所有患者应实施最佳治疗,包括积极的生活方式改变和伴随的药物治疗,以最大限度地从PCI或CABG中获益。未来有必要对更新的第二代或第三代DES和生物可吸收DES进行前瞻性随机对照试验,以确定将来PCI是否优于CABG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Recurrent Renal Infarction Following Transient Resolution: Evidence From Serial Computed Tomography. Is Renal Denervation Effective in Treating Resistant Hypertension? Use of Fludrocortisone for Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Not Yet on Dialysis. Fatal Hypermagnesemia in Patients Taking Magnesium Hydroxide. Osmotic Demyelination Syndrome in a High-Risk Patient Despite Cautious Correction of Hyponatremia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1