Surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic uncinate process in a cancer hospital in egypt.

Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2015-01-14 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.4137/CGast.S20650
Sameh Roshdy, Osama Hussein, Ahmed Abdallah, Khaled Abdel-Wahab, Ahmed Senbel
{"title":"Surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic uncinate process in a cancer hospital in egypt.","authors":"Sameh Roshdy,&nbsp;Osama Hussein,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdallah,&nbsp;Khaled Abdel-Wahab,&nbsp;Ahmed Senbel","doi":"10.4137/CGast.S20650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic carcinoma affecting the uncinate process is a challenging surgical condition. Several considerations affect the management plan, including the need for vascular resection and the ability to achieve a clear margin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of 19 patients who had curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process were reviewed. Operative mortality and morbidity, and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 13 male and 6 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. Nine patients (47.4%) had stage I disease, seven patients (36.8%) had stage II disease, and three patients (15.8%) had stage III disease. A total of 12 patients had Whipple procedure and 7 patients had total pancreatectomy. In total, there were 9 R0 and 10 R1 resections. Operative mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19), postoperative leakage rate was 21.1% (4/19), and wound sepsis rate was 21.1%. Median DFS was 19.2 months. Survival was superior in the Whipple procedure group than in the total pancreatectomy group (median survival 19 months vs 4 months, respectively). Vascular resection and retroperitoneal safety margin status did not affect disease relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process should be offered R0 or R1 resection whenever technically feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10382,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology","volume":"8 ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/CGast.S20650","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/CGast.S20650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic carcinoma affecting the uncinate process is a challenging surgical condition. Several considerations affect the management plan, including the need for vascular resection and the ability to achieve a clear margin.

Methods: The data of 19 patients who had curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process were reviewed. Operative mortality and morbidity, and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

Results: The study population included 13 male and 6 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. Nine patients (47.4%) had stage I disease, seven patients (36.8%) had stage II disease, and three patients (15.8%) had stage III disease. A total of 12 patients had Whipple procedure and 7 patients had total pancreatectomy. In total, there were 9 R0 and 10 R1 resections. Operative mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19), postoperative leakage rate was 21.1% (4/19), and wound sepsis rate was 21.1%. Median DFS was 19.2 months. Survival was superior in the Whipple procedure group than in the total pancreatectomy group (median survival 19 months vs 4 months, respectively). Vascular resection and retroperitoneal safety margin status did not affect disease relapse.

Conclusion: Non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process should be offered R0 or R1 resection whenever technically feasible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及一家肿瘤医院胰钩突腺癌的手术治疗。
简介:胰腺癌影响钩突是一个具有挑战性的手术条件。有几个因素会影响治疗计划,包括是否需要切除血管和是否有能力获得明确的切缘。方法:回顾19例经根治性切除钩突胰腺腺癌的临床资料。计算手术死亡率、发病率和无病生存率(DFS)。结果:研究人群包括男性13例,女性6例,平均年龄55岁。9例患者(47.4%)为I期,7例患者(36.8%)为II期,3例患者(15.8%)为III期。12例行惠普尔手术,7例行全胰切除术。总共有9个R0和10个R1切除。手术死亡率10.5%(2/19),术后漏液率21.1%(4/19),伤口败血症率21.1%。中位DFS为19.2个月。惠普尔手术组的生存期优于全胰切除术组(中位生存期分别为19个月和4个月)。血管切除和腹膜后安全边界状态不影响疾病复发。结论:钩突非转移性胰腺腺癌应在技术可行的情况下进行R0或R1切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biodegradable Stents in Resistant Peptic Oesophageal Stricture: Is It the Right Way to Go? Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation? Understanding Therapeutic Concepts in Crohn's Disease. The Benefits of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Muscular and Functional Capacity of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial. Impact of Video Aid on Quality of Bowel Preparation Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1