The patients' active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2015-09-01 Epub Date: 2015-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1
Ines Baudendistel, Eva Winkler, Martina Kamradt, Sarah Brophy, Gerda Längst, Felicitas Eckrich, Oliver Heinze, Bjoern Bergh, Joachim Szecsenyi, Dominik Ose
{"title":"The patients' active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Ines Baudendistel,&nbsp;Eva Winkler,&nbsp;Martina Kamradt,&nbsp;Sarah Brophy,&nbsp;Gerda Längst,&nbsp;Felicitas Eckrich,&nbsp;Oliver Heinze,&nbsp;Bjoern Bergh,&nbsp;Joachim Szecsenyi,&nbsp;Dominik Ose","doi":"10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The complexity of illness and cross-sectoral health care pose challenges for patients with colorectal cancer and their families. Within a patient-centered care paradigm, it is vital to give patients the opportunity to play an active role. Prospective users' attitudes regarding the patients' role in the context of a patient-controlled electronic health record (PEPA) were explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study across regional health care settings and health professions was conducted. Overall, 10 focus groups were performed collecting views of 3 user groups: patients with colorectal cancer (n = 12) and representatives from patient support groups (n = 2), physicians (n = 17), and other health care professionals (HCPs) (n = 16). Data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' responsibility as a gatekeeper and access manager was at the center of the focus group discussions, although HCPs addressed aspects that would limit patients taking an active role (e.g., illness related issues). Despite expressed concerns, PEPAs possibility to enhance personal responsibility was seen in all user groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Giving patients an active role in managing a personal electronic health record is an innovative patient-centered approach, although existing restraints have to be recognized. To enhance user adoption and advance PEPAs potential, key user needs have to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"23 9","pages":"2613-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Purpose: The complexity of illness and cross-sectoral health care pose challenges for patients with colorectal cancer and their families. Within a patient-centered care paradigm, it is vital to give patients the opportunity to play an active role. Prospective users' attitudes regarding the patients' role in the context of a patient-controlled electronic health record (PEPA) were explored.

Methods: A qualitative study across regional health care settings and health professions was conducted. Overall, 10 focus groups were performed collecting views of 3 user groups: patients with colorectal cancer (n = 12) and representatives from patient support groups (n = 2), physicians (n = 17), and other health care professionals (HCPs) (n = 16). Data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: The patients' responsibility as a gatekeeper and access manager was at the center of the focus group discussions, although HCPs addressed aspects that would limit patients taking an active role (e.g., illness related issues). Despite expressed concerns, PEPAs possibility to enhance personal responsibility was seen in all user groups.

Conclusions: Giving patients an active role in managing a personal electronic health record is an innovative patient-centered approach, although existing restraints have to be recognized. To enhance user adoption and advance PEPAs potential, key user needs have to be addressed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者在管理个人电子健康记录中的积极作用:定性分析。
目的:疾病的复杂性和跨部门的卫生保健给结直肠癌患者及其家属带来了挑战。在以患者为中心的护理范式中,给予患者发挥积极作用的机会至关重要。研究探讨了潜在用户对患者在患者控制的电子健康记录(PEPA)中所扮演角色的态度。方法:对区域卫生保健机构和卫生专业进行定性研究。总体而言,进行了10个焦点小组,收集了3个用户群体的意见:结直肠癌患者(n = 12)和患者支持小组代表(n = 2),医生(n = 17)和其他卫生保健专业人员(HCPs) (n = 16)。数据录音和录像,逐字转录,并使用定性内容分析进行主题分析。结果:患者作为看门人和访问管理者的责任是焦点小组讨论的中心,尽管HCPs解决了限制患者发挥积极作用的方面(例如,与疾病相关的问题)。尽管表达了担忧,但在所有用户群体中都可以看到PEPAs增强个人责任的可能性。结论:让患者在管理个人电子健康记录方面发挥积极作用是一种创新的以患者为中心的方法,尽管必须认识到现有的限制。为了增强用户的采用和提高PEPAs的潜力,必须解决关键用户的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Time-dependent efficacy of zinc supplements in preventing oral mucositis after chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis. Trends in emotional distress among childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors: A decade-long study. Acute oncology hospital care at home for post-chemotherapy monitoring. The experience and supportive care needs in people affected by ovarian cancer and their informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review. Home-based multimodal prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1