Can mHealth Improve Risk Assessment in Underserved Populations? Acceptability of a Breast Health Questionnaire App in Ethnically Diverse, Older, Low-Income Women.

Carolina Bravo, Cristina O'Donoghue, Celia P Kaplan, Judith Luce, Elissa Ozanne
{"title":"Can mHealth Improve Risk Assessment in Underserved Populations? Acceptability of a Breast Health Questionnaire App in Ethnically Diverse, Older, Low-Income Women.","authors":"Carolina Bravo,&nbsp;Cristina O'Donoghue,&nbsp;Celia P Kaplan,&nbsp;Judith Luce,&nbsp;Elissa Ozanne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of mobile health (mHealth) tools has expanded rapidly but little research has been done on its acceptability by low-income, diverse, older patient populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the attitudes of a diverse group of underserved women on the acceptability and usability of mHealth tools in a clinical setting using a breast health questionnaire application (app) at a public hospital mammography clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a breast-imaging center of an urban safety net institution from July-August 2012. Interviews included pre- and post-questions. Women completed the Athena breast health questionnaire app on an iPad and were asked about their experience and ways to improve the tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen women age 45-79 years from diverse ethnic and educational backgrounds were interviewed. The majority of women, 11 of 15, preferred the Athena app over a paper version and all the women thought the app was easy to use. Two Spanish-speaking Latinas preferred paper; and two women, with limited mobile phone use, did not have a preference. Many women indicated that it would be necessary to have staff available for instruction and assistance if the app were to be implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mHealth tools are an acceptable, if not preferred, method of collecting health information for diverse, older, low-income women. Further studies are required to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of data collection using mHealth tools in underserved populations. mHealth tools should be explored as a novel way to engage diverse populations to improve clinical care and bridge gaps in health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":15847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335717/pdf/nihms640279.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of mobile health (mHealth) tools has expanded rapidly but little research has been done on its acceptability by low-income, diverse, older patient populations.

Objective: To assess the attitudes of a diverse group of underserved women on the acceptability and usability of mHealth tools in a clinical setting using a breast health questionnaire application (app) at a public hospital mammography clinic.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a breast-imaging center of an urban safety net institution from July-August 2012. Interviews included pre- and post-questions. Women completed the Athena breast health questionnaire app on an iPad and were asked about their experience and ways to improve the tool.

Results: Fifteen women age 45-79 years from diverse ethnic and educational backgrounds were interviewed. The majority of women, 11 of 15, preferred the Athena app over a paper version and all the women thought the app was easy to use. Two Spanish-speaking Latinas preferred paper; and two women, with limited mobile phone use, did not have a preference. Many women indicated that it would be necessary to have staff available for instruction and assistance if the app were to be implemented.

Conclusions: mHealth tools are an acceptable, if not preferred, method of collecting health information for diverse, older, low-income women. Further studies are required to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of data collection using mHealth tools in underserved populations. mHealth tools should be explored as a novel way to engage diverse populations to improve clinical care and bridge gaps in health disparities.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动医疗可以改善服务不足人群的风险评估吗?乳房健康问卷应用程序在不同种族、年龄较大、低收入妇女中的可接受性
背景:移动医疗(mHealth)工具的使用迅速扩大,但对低收入、多样化、老年患者群体的可接受性进行的研究很少。目的:通过在公立医院乳房x光检查诊所使用乳房健康问卷应用程序(app),评估不同群体缺乏医疗服务的妇女对临床环境中移动医疗工具的可接受性和可用性的态度。方法:2012年7 - 8月在某城市社会保障机构乳腺影像中心进行半结构式访谈。访谈包括前问和后问。女性在iPad上完成了雅典娜乳房健康问卷应用程序,并被问及她们的体验和改进该工具的方法。结果:访谈了15名年龄在45-79岁之间的不同种族和教育背景的女性。15名女性中有11名更喜欢雅典娜应用程序,而不是纸质版本,所有女性都认为该应用程序易于使用。两名说西班牙语的拉丁裔偏爱论文;而两名使用手机有限的女性则没有偏好。许多女性表示,如果要实施这款应用,有必要让工作人员提供指导和帮助。结论:移动健康工具是一种可接受的,如果不是首选的,收集健康信息的不同,老年,低收入妇女的方法。需要进一步的研究来评估在服务不足的人群中使用移动健康工具收集数据的可靠性和准确性。移动医疗工具应作为一种新颖的方式加以探索,使不同人群参与进来,改善临床护理,弥合健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From a Place of Love: The Experiences of Birthing in a Black-Owned Culturally-Centered Community Birth Center. Motherhood Together: Effects of an Adapted Prenatal Curriculum on Mother and Infant Outcomes. Can Community Gardens with Workshops Increase Gardening Behavior? A Navajo Wellness Collaboration. Knowledge, Motivations and Concerns about Participation in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in Puerto Rico. Sex Differences in Risk Factors for Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer among Puerto Rican Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1