Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter FDA IDE Study of CHARITÉ Artificial Disc versus Lumbar Fusion: Effect at 5-year Follow-up of Prior Surgery and Prior Discectomy on Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Arthroplasty.

SAS journal Pub Date : 2009-03-01 eCollection Date: 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1016/SASJ-2008-0019-RR
Fred H Geisler, Paul C McAfee, Robert J Banco, Scott L Blumenthal, Richard D Guyer, Richard T Holt, Mohamed E Majd
{"title":"Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter FDA IDE Study of CHARITÉ Artificial Disc versus Lumbar Fusion: Effect at 5-year Follow-up of Prior Surgery and Prior Discectomy on Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Arthroplasty.","authors":"Fred H Geisler,&nbsp;Paul C McAfee,&nbsp;Robert J Banco,&nbsp;Scott L Blumenthal,&nbsp;Richard D Guyer,&nbsp;Richard T Holt,&nbsp;Mohamed E Majd","doi":"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0019-RR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candidates for spinal arthrodesis or arthroplasty often present with a history of prior surgery such as laminectomy, laminotomy or discectomy. In this study, lumbar arthroplasty patients with prior surgery, and in particular patients with prior discectomy, were evaluated for their clinical outcomes at the 5-year time point.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized patients from the 5-year CHARITÉ investigational device exemption (IDE) study were divided as follows: 1) fusion prior surgery (excluding prior decompression with fusion) group (FSG); 2) fusion prior discectomy group (FDG); 3) fusion no prior surgery group (FNG); 4) arthroplasty prior surgery group (ASG); 5) arthroplasty prior discectomy group (ADG); and 6) arthroplasty no prior surgery group (ANG). The 5-year clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI), patient satisfaction, and work status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the arthroplasty group, all subgroups had statistically significant VAS improvements from baseline (VAS change from baseline: ASG = -36.6 ± 29.6, P < 0.0001; ADG = -40.2 ± 30.9, P = 0.0002; ANG = -36.5 ± 34.6, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between subgroups (P = 0.5587). In the fusion group, VAS changes from baseline were statistically significant for the FNG and FSG subgroups, but not for the FDG patients (FNG = -46.3 ± 28.8, P < 0.0001; FSG = -24.2 ± 36.4, P = 0.0444; FDG = -26.7 ± 38.7, P = 0.2188). A trend of decreased VAS improvements was observed for FSG versus FNG (P = 0.0703) subgroups. Similar findings and trends were observed in ODI scores (Changes in ODI from baseline: ASG = -20.4 ± 23.8, P < 0.0001; ANG = -26.6±21.1, P < 0.0001; ADG= -17.6 ± 28.6, P = 0.0116; FSG = -14.5 ± 21.2, P = 0.0303; FNG= -32.5 ± 22.6, P < 0.0001; FDG = -10.7 ± 9.4, P = 0.0938). The greatest improvement in work status from preoperative to postoperative was seen in the ADG subgroup (28% increase in part- and full-time employment), while the FDG subgroup showed the greatest reduction in work status (17% decrease).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroplasty patients with prior surgery or prior discectomy had similar clinical outcomes as arthroplasty patients without prior surgery, while fusion patients with prior surgery or prior discectomy showed trends of lowered clinical outcomes compared to fusion patients without prior surgery or discectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"17-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/c9/SAS-3-2008-0019-RR.PMC4365588.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0019-RR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Candidates for spinal arthrodesis or arthroplasty often present with a history of prior surgery such as laminectomy, laminotomy or discectomy. In this study, lumbar arthroplasty patients with prior surgery, and in particular patients with prior discectomy, were evaluated for their clinical outcomes at the 5-year time point.

Methods: Randomized patients from the 5-year CHARITÉ investigational device exemption (IDE) study were divided as follows: 1) fusion prior surgery (excluding prior decompression with fusion) group (FSG); 2) fusion prior discectomy group (FDG); 3) fusion no prior surgery group (FNG); 4) arthroplasty prior surgery group (ASG); 5) arthroplasty prior discectomy group (ADG); and 6) arthroplasty no prior surgery group (ANG). The 5-year clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI), patient satisfaction, and work status.

Results: In the arthroplasty group, all subgroups had statistically significant VAS improvements from baseline (VAS change from baseline: ASG = -36.6 ± 29.6, P < 0.0001; ADG = -40.2 ± 30.9, P = 0.0002; ANG = -36.5 ± 34.6, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between subgroups (P = 0.5587). In the fusion group, VAS changes from baseline were statistically significant for the FNG and FSG subgroups, but not for the FDG patients (FNG = -46.3 ± 28.8, P < 0.0001; FSG = -24.2 ± 36.4, P = 0.0444; FDG = -26.7 ± 38.7, P = 0.2188). A trend of decreased VAS improvements was observed for FSG versus FNG (P = 0.0703) subgroups. Similar findings and trends were observed in ODI scores (Changes in ODI from baseline: ASG = -20.4 ± 23.8, P < 0.0001; ANG = -26.6±21.1, P < 0.0001; ADG= -17.6 ± 28.6, P = 0.0116; FSG = -14.5 ± 21.2, P = 0.0303; FNG= -32.5 ± 22.6, P < 0.0001; FDG = -10.7 ± 9.4, P = 0.0938). The greatest improvement in work status from preoperative to postoperative was seen in the ADG subgroup (28% increase in part- and full-time employment), while the FDG subgroup showed the greatest reduction in work status (17% decrease).

Conclusions: Arthroplasty patients with prior surgery or prior discectomy had similar clinical outcomes as arthroplasty patients without prior surgery, while fusion patients with prior surgery or prior discectomy showed trends of lowered clinical outcomes compared to fusion patients without prior surgery or discectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CHARITÉ人工椎间盘与腰椎融合的前瞻性、随机、多中心FDA IDE研究:既往手术和既往椎间盘切除术对腰椎关节置换术后临床结果的5年随访影响
背景:腰椎融合术或关节成形术的候选人通常有手术史,如椎板切除术、椎板切开术或椎间盘切除术。在这项研究中,腰椎关节置换术患者既往手术,特别是既往椎间盘切除术患者,在5年时间点评估其临床结果。方法:从5年CHARITÉ试验性器械豁免(IDE)研究中随机抽取患者分为:1)术前融合组(不包括术前减压融合)(FSG);2)融合前椎间盘切除术组(FDG);3)融合无手术史组(FNG);4)关节置换术术前组(ASG);5)关节置换术组(ADG);6)关节置换术无手术史组(ANG)。5年临床结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数2.0 (ODI)、患者满意度和工作状态。结果:在关节置换术组,所有亚组VAS较基线均有统计学意义的改善(VAS较基线变化:ASG = -36.6±29.6,P < 0.0001;Adg = -40.2±30.9,p = 0.0002;Ang = -36.5±34.6,p < 0.0001)。亚组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.5587)。在融合组中,FNG和FSG亚组的VAS较基线变化有统计学意义,但FDG患者无统计学意义(FNG = -46.3±28.8,P < 0.0001;FSG = -24.2±36.4,p = 0.0444;FDG = -26.7±38.7,p = 0.2188)。FSG亚组与FNG亚组相比,VAS改善有降低的趋势(P = 0.0703)。ODI评分也出现了类似的结果和趋势(ODI与基线相比的变化:ASG = -20.4±23.8,P < 0.0001;Ang = -26.6±21.1,p < 0.0001;Adg = -17.6±28.6,p = 0.0116;FSG = -14.5±21.2,p = 0.0303;Fng = -32.5±22.6,p < 0.0001;FDG = -10.7±9.4,p = 0.0938)。从术前到术后,ADG亚组的工作状态改善最大(兼职和全职工作增加28%),而FDG亚组的工作状态减少最大(减少17%)。结论:既往手术或椎间盘切除术的关节置换术患者临床预后与未手术的关节置换术患者相似,而既往手术或椎间盘切除术的融合术患者临床预后较未手术或椎间盘切除术的融合术患者有降低趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1