Survivorship of coflex Interlaminar-Interspinous Implant.

SAS journal Pub Date : 2009-06-01 eCollection Date: 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1016/SASJ-2008-0027-RR
Thomas J Errico, Jonathan R Kamerlink, Martin Quirno, Jacques Samani, Robert J Chomiak
{"title":"Survivorship of coflex Interlaminar-Interspinous Implant.","authors":"Thomas J Errico,&nbsp;Jonathan R Kamerlink,&nbsp;Martin Quirno,&nbsp;Jacques Samani,&nbsp;Robert J Chomiak","doi":"10.1016/SASJ-2008-0027-RR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for implantation of the coflex device (Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, New York), assess long-term complications, and evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 127 patients underwent placement of a coflex implant for various indications by one orthopaedic spine surgeon. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years. The original indications for implantation were determined based upon the data provided in the case report forms. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients were asked to grade their low-back and leg pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the pain severity scale: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), or severe pain (3). Patients were queried about their satisfaction with the surgical procedure. Follow-up radiographs were taken to determine any device-related issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most prevalent diagnoses for implantation were spinal stenosis (19.7%) and spinal stenosis with lumbar disc herniation (35.4%). The mean severity of low-back pain was decreased by 33% (from moderate to mild) at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001) and at the 5-year follow-up (from moderate to mild, P < .001). The mean severity of leg pain was decreased by 66% (from severe to mild) at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001) and at the 5-year follow-up (from severe to mild, P < .001). At the mean follow-up period of 6.3 years, a patient satisfaction query demonstrated that 7% were unsatisfied, 46% were satisfied, and 46% were very satisfied with their clinical outcome. Based on the follow-up radiographs, 92 of patients had no devicerelated issues and 8% had device-related issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data provided have demonstrated that the coflex implant provides pain relief for patients with low-back pain and leg pain. The most common indications for implantation were spinal stenosis and spinal stenosis with lumbar disc herniation. There were very few device-related complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Using coflex is a safe and viable option in the selection of instrumentation for spinal stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/9b/SAS-3-2008-0027-RR.PMC4365593.pdf","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2008-0027-RR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the indications for implantation of the coflex device (Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, New York), assess long-term complications, and evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients.

Methods: A total of 127 patients underwent placement of a coflex implant for various indications by one orthopaedic spine surgeon. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years. The original indications for implantation were determined based upon the data provided in the case report forms. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients were asked to grade their low-back and leg pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the pain severity scale: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), or severe pain (3). Patients were queried about their satisfaction with the surgical procedure. Follow-up radiographs were taken to determine any device-related issues.

Results: The most prevalent diagnoses for implantation were spinal stenosis (19.7%) and spinal stenosis with lumbar disc herniation (35.4%). The mean severity of low-back pain was decreased by 33% (from moderate to mild) at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001) and at the 5-year follow-up (from moderate to mild, P < .001). The mean severity of leg pain was decreased by 66% (from severe to mild) at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001) and at the 5-year follow-up (from severe to mild, P < .001). At the mean follow-up period of 6.3 years, a patient satisfaction query demonstrated that 7% were unsatisfied, 46% were satisfied, and 46% were very satisfied with their clinical outcome. Based on the follow-up radiographs, 92 of patients had no devicerelated issues and 8% had device-related issues.

Conclusion: The data provided have demonstrated that the coflex implant provides pain relief for patients with low-back pain and leg pain. The most common indications for implantation were spinal stenosis and spinal stenosis with lumbar disc herniation. There were very few device-related complications.

Clinical significance: Using coflex is a safe and viable option in the selection of instrumentation for spinal stabilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎板间-棘间假体的成活率。
背景:本研究的目的是确定coflex装置植入的适应症(Paradigm Spine, LLC, New York, New York),评估长期并发症,并评估患者的长期临床结果。方法:共有127例患者接受了一个骨科脊柱外科医生的各种适应症的coflex植入。平均随访时间为6.3年。最初的植入适应症是根据病例报告表格中提供的数据确定的。术前和术后,患者被要求使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和疼痛严重程度量表对腰背痛和腿部疼痛进行分级:无疼痛(0)、轻度疼痛(1)、中度疼痛(2)或重度疼痛(3)。询问患者对手术过程的满意度。随访x线片以确定任何与器械相关的问题。结果:椎管狭窄症(19.7%)和椎管狭窄症合并腰椎间盘突出症(35.4%)是植入术中最常见的诊断。2年随访时腰痛的平均严重程度(从中度到轻度)降低了33% (P < 0.001), 5年随访时(从中度到轻度,P < 0.001)。在2年随访期间(从严重到轻微)和5年随访期间(从严重到轻微,P < 0.001),腿部疼痛的平均严重程度降低了66%。在平均6.3年的随访期间,患者满意度查询显示,7%的患者不满意,46%的患者满意,46%的患者非常满意他们的临床结果。根据随访x线片,92例患者无器械相关问题,8%有器械相关问题。结论:所提供的数据表明,coflex植入物可以缓解腰痛和腿痛患者的疼痛。最常见的适应症是椎管狭窄和椎管狭窄合并腰椎间盘突出。很少有器械相关的并发症。临床意义:使用coflex固定是一种安全可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1