Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications

Kenneth Vaz BS, Kushagra Verma MS, Themistocles Protopsaltis MD, Frank Schwab MD, Baron Lonner MD, Thomas Errico MD
{"title":"Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications","authors":"Kenneth Vaz BS,&nbsp;Kushagra Verma MS,&nbsp;Themistocles Protopsaltis MD,&nbsp;Frank Schwab MD,&nbsp;Baron Lonner MD,&nbsp;Thomas Errico MD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Iliac crest harvest has been considered the “gold standard” at producing successful arthrodesis of the lumbar spine but is also associated with many donor-site morbidities. Many alternatives have been used to avoid iliac crest harvest, including autologous bone from other donor sites, allogeneic bone, ceramics, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs). This review will highlight the properties and preparations of these graft types and their potential complications and reported clinical efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A Medline search was conducted via PubMed by use of the following terms in various combinations: lumbar fusion, freeze-dried allograft, fresh-frozen allograft, autograft, iliac crest, demineralized bone matrix, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7, scoliosis, bone marrow aspirate, HEALOS, coralline hydroxyapatite, beta tricalcium phosphate, synthetic, ceramics, spinal fusion, PLF, PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF. Only articles written in English were assessed for appropriate material. Related articles were also assessed depending on the content of articles found in the original literature search.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although iliac crest remains the gold standard, reported success with alternative approaches, especially in combination, has shown promise. Stronger evidence with limited sources of potential bias is necessary to provide a clear picture of their clinical efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 75-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.004","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981010000447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background

Iliac crest harvest has been considered the “gold standard” at producing successful arthrodesis of the lumbar spine but is also associated with many donor-site morbidities. Many alternatives have been used to avoid iliac crest harvest, including autologous bone from other donor sites, allogeneic bone, ceramics, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs). This review will highlight the properties and preparations of these graft types and their potential complications and reported clinical efficacy.

Methods

A Medline search was conducted via PubMed by use of the following terms in various combinations: lumbar fusion, freeze-dried allograft, fresh-frozen allograft, autograft, iliac crest, demineralized bone matrix, rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7, scoliosis, bone marrow aspirate, HEALOS, coralline hydroxyapatite, beta tricalcium phosphate, synthetic, ceramics, spinal fusion, PLF, PLIF, ALIF, and TLIF. Only articles written in English were assessed for appropriate material. Related articles were also assessed depending on the content of articles found in the original literature search.

Conclusions

Although iliac crest remains the gold standard, reported success with alternative approaches, especially in combination, has shown promise. Stronger evidence with limited sources of potential bias is necessary to provide a clear picture of their clinical efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎手术的植骨选择:临床疗效和并发症的回顾
背景:髂嵴切除术被认为是腰椎关节融合术成功的“金标准”,但也与许多供体部位的发病率有关。许多替代方法已被用于避免髂嵴摘取,包括来自其他供体部位的自体骨、异体骨、陶瓷和重组人骨形态发生蛋白(rhbmp)。本文将重点介绍这些移植物的性质和制备方法,以及它们的潜在并发症和已报道的临床疗效。方法通过PubMed检索不同组合的相关术语:腰椎融合术、冻干同种异体移植物、新鲜冷冻同种异体移植物、自体移植物、髂骨、脱矿骨基质、rhBMP-2、rhBMP-7、脊柱侧弯、骨髓抽吸、HEALOS、coralline hydroxyapatite、β -磷酸三钙、synthetic、ceramics、脊柱融合术、PLF、PLIF、ALIF、TLIF。只有用英语写的文章才会被评估为合适的材料。相关文章也根据在原始文献检索中发现的文章的内容进行评估。结论虽然髂骨仍是金标准,但有报道称替代入路的成功,尤其是联合入路,已显示出前景。有必要在有限的潜在偏倚来源下提供更有力的证据,以提供其临床疗效的清晰图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1