Does core mobility of lumbar total disc arthroplasty influence sagittal and frontal intervertebral displacement? Radiologic comparison with fixed-core prosthesis

Joël Delécrin MD , Jérôme Allain MD , Jacques Beaurain MD , Jean-Paul Steib MD , Hervé Chataigner MD , Lucie Aubourg PhD , Jean Huppert MD , Marc Ameil MD , Jean-Michel Nguyen MD, PhD
{"title":"Does core mobility of lumbar total disc arthroplasty influence sagittal and frontal intervertebral displacement? Radiologic comparison with fixed-core prosthesis","authors":"Joël Delécrin MD ,&nbsp;Jérôme Allain MD ,&nbsp;Jacques Beaurain MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Steib MD ,&nbsp;Hervé Chataigner MD ,&nbsp;Lucie Aubourg PhD ,&nbsp;Jean Huppert MD ,&nbsp;Marc Ameil MD ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Nguyen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An artificial disc prosthesis is thought to restore segmental motion in the lumbar spine. However, it is reported that disc prosthesis can increase the intervertebral translation (VT). The concept of the mobile-core prosthesis is to mimic the kinematic effects of the migration of the natural nucleus and therefore core mobility should minimize the VT. This study explored the hypothesis that core translation should influence VT and that a mobile core prosthesis may facilitate physiological motion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Vertebral translation (measured with a new method presented here), core translation, range of motion (ROM), and distribution of flexion-extension were measured on flexion-extension, neutral standing, and lateral bending films in 89 patients (63 mobile-core [M]; 33 fixed-core [F]).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At L4-5 levels the VT with M was lower than with F and similar to the VT of untreated levels. At L5-S1 levels the VT with M was lower than with F but was significantly different compared to untreated levels. At M levels a strong correlation was found between VT and core translation; the VT decreases as the core translation increases. At F levels the VT increases as the ROM increases. No significant difference was found between the ROM of untreated levels and levels implanted with either M or F. Regarding the mobility distribution with M and F we observed a deficit in extension at L5-S1 levels and a similar distribution at L4-5 levels compared to untreated levels.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The intervertebral mobility was different between M and F. The M at L4-5 levels succeeded to replicate mobility similar to L4-5 untreated levels. The M at L5-S1 succeeded in ROM, but failed regarding VT and mobility distribution. Nevertheless M minimized VT at L5-S1 levels. The F increased VT at both L4-5 and L5-S1.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>This study validates the concept that the core translation of an artificial lumbar disc prosthesis minimizes the VT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.esas.2009.09.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935981009000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

An artificial disc prosthesis is thought to restore segmental motion in the lumbar spine. However, it is reported that disc prosthesis can increase the intervertebral translation (VT). The concept of the mobile-core prosthesis is to mimic the kinematic effects of the migration of the natural nucleus and therefore core mobility should minimize the VT. This study explored the hypothesis that core translation should influence VT and that a mobile core prosthesis may facilitate physiological motion.

Methods

Vertebral translation (measured with a new method presented here), core translation, range of motion (ROM), and distribution of flexion-extension were measured on flexion-extension, neutral standing, and lateral bending films in 89 patients (63 mobile-core [M]; 33 fixed-core [F]).

Results

At L4-5 levels the VT with M was lower than with F and similar to the VT of untreated levels. At L5-S1 levels the VT with M was lower than with F but was significantly different compared to untreated levels. At M levels a strong correlation was found between VT and core translation; the VT decreases as the core translation increases. At F levels the VT increases as the ROM increases. No significant difference was found between the ROM of untreated levels and levels implanted with either M or F. Regarding the mobility distribution with M and F we observed a deficit in extension at L5-S1 levels and a similar distribution at L4-5 levels compared to untreated levels.

Conclusion

The intervertebral mobility was different between M and F. The M at L4-5 levels succeeded to replicate mobility similar to L4-5 untreated levels. The M at L5-S1 succeeded in ROM, but failed regarding VT and mobility distribution. Nevertheless M minimized VT at L5-S1 levels. The F increased VT at both L4-5 and L5-S1.

Clinical Relevance

This study validates the concept that the core translation of an artificial lumbar disc prosthesis minimizes the VT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎全椎间盘置换术的核心活动度是否影响矢状位和额位椎间位移?与固定核假体放射学比较
背景:人工椎间盘假体被认为可以恢复腰椎的节段性运动。然而,有报道称椎间盘假体可以增加椎间平移(VT)。可移动核心假体的概念是模仿自然核迁移的运动学效应,因此核心的移动应该最小化VT。本研究探讨了核心平移应该影响VT的假设,以及可移动核心假体可能促进生理运动的假设。方法对89例患者的椎体平移(采用本文提出的新方法测量)、核心平移、活动范围(ROM)和屈伸分布在屈伸、中立站立和侧屈上进行测量(63例移动核心[M];33固定芯[F])。结果在l4 ~ 5水平,M组的VT低于F组,且与未治疗组相似。在L5-S1水平下,M组的VT低于F组,但与未治疗组相比有显著差异。在M水平上,VT与核心翻译有很强的相关性;VT随核心平移量的增大而减小。在F水平,VT随着ROM的增加而增加。未治疗的节段与植入M或F的节段的关节活动度没有显著差异。至于M和F的活动度分布,我们观察到L5-S1节段的伸展不足,L4-5节段的分布与未治疗节段相似。结论M和f的椎间活动度不同,L4-5水平的M成功复制了与L4-5未治疗水平相似的活动度。L5-S1在ROM上成功,但在VT和迁移率分布上失败。然而,M最小化L5-S1水平的VT。F增加L4-5和L5-S1的VT。临床意义本研究验证了人工腰椎间盘假体的核心移位可以减少VT的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1