Validation of the Hebrew and Arabic Versions of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45).

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Raz Gross, Saralee Glasser, David Elisha, Orya Tishby, Daria Madar Jacobson, Gila Levitan, Michael J Lambert, Alexander M Ponizovsky
{"title":"Validation of the Hebrew and Arabic Versions of the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45).","authors":"Raz Gross,&nbsp;Saralee Glasser,&nbsp;David Elisha,&nbsp;Orya Tishby,&nbsp;Daria Madar Jacobson,&nbsp;Gila Levitan,&nbsp;Michael J Lambert,&nbsp;Alexander M Ponizovsky","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring the progress of mental health treatment aids in assessment and monitoring of psychotherapeutic outcomes. The OQ-45 is a widely accepted measure of such outcomes. The aim of this study was to validate the Hebrew and Arabic versions of the OQ-45.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from three samples: non patient university students (n=189), university mental health clinic patients (n=37), and outpatient mental health clinic patients (n=135). Subjects completed the OQ-45 as well as the BSI and PHQ-9 questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test-retest and internal reliability, and concurrent and discriminative validity of both OQ-45 versions were satisfactory. Sensitivity of the Hebrew and Arabic versions was 0.70 and 0.80, respectively, and the specificity was 0.69and 0.93, respectively. Sensitivity-to-change was noted only for the Symptom Distress (SD) subscale.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Sensitivity-to-change was not demonstrated for the total OQ-45, possibly due to a too-short follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adequate psychometric properties of the Hebrew and Arabic OQ-45 suggest that they can serve as useful measures of mental health treatment in Israel.Further research is necessary to confirm norms, cut-off scores and sensitivity-to-change using a larger representative population and diverse types of treatment over a longer period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49288,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","volume":"52 1","pages":"33-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measuring the progress of mental health treatment aids in assessment and monitoring of psychotherapeutic outcomes. The OQ-45 is a widely accepted measure of such outcomes. The aim of this study was to validate the Hebrew and Arabic versions of the OQ-45.

Method: Data were collected from three samples: non patient university students (n=189), university mental health clinic patients (n=37), and outpatient mental health clinic patients (n=135). Subjects completed the OQ-45 as well as the BSI and PHQ-9 questionnaires.

Results: Test-retest and internal reliability, and concurrent and discriminative validity of both OQ-45 versions were satisfactory. Sensitivity of the Hebrew and Arabic versions was 0.70 and 0.80, respectively, and the specificity was 0.69and 0.93, respectively. Sensitivity-to-change was noted only for the Symptom Distress (SD) subscale.

Limitations: Sensitivity-to-change was not demonstrated for the total OQ-45, possibly due to a too-short follow-up period.

Conclusions: Adequate psychometric properties of the Hebrew and Arabic OQ-45 suggest that they can serve as useful measures of mental health treatment in Israel.Further research is necessary to confirm norms, cut-off scores and sensitivity-to-change using a larger representative population and diverse types of treatment over a longer period of time.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结果问卷(OQ-45)的希伯来语和阿拉伯语版本的验证。
背景:测量心理健康治疗进展有助于评估和监测心理治疗结果。OQ-45是一个被广泛接受的衡量此类结果的指标。本研究的目的是验证OQ-45的希伯来语和阿拉伯语版本。方法:收集非患者大学生(n=189)、大学心理健康门诊患者(n=37)和门诊心理健康门诊患者(n=135) 3个样本的数据。受试者完成了OQ-45以及BSI和PHQ-9问卷。结果:重测信度、内部信度、并发效度和判别效度均较好。希伯来语和阿拉伯语版本的敏感性分别为0.70和0.80,特异性分别为0.69和0.93。对改变的敏感性仅在症状困扰(SD)分量表中被注意到。局限性:可能由于随访时间太短,未证明总OQ-45对变化的敏感性。结论:希伯来语和阿拉伯语OQ-45的充分心理测量特性表明,它们可以作为以色列心理健康治疗的有用措施。需要进一步的研究来确认规范、临界值和对变化的敏感性,使用更大的代表性人群和更长的时间内不同类型的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: THE ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY publishes original articles dealing with the all bio-psycho-social aspects of psychiatry. While traditionally the journal has published manuscripts relating to mobility, relocation, acculturation, ethnicity, stress situations in war and peace, victimology and mental health in developing countries, papers addressing all aspects of the psychiatry including neuroscience, biological psychiatry, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy and ethics are welcome. The Editor also welcomes pertinent book reviews and correspondence. Preference is given to research reports of no more than 5,000 words not including abstract, text, references, tables and figures. There should be no more than 40 references and 4 tables or figures. Brief reports (1,500 words, 5 references) are considered if they have heuristic value. Books to be considered for review should be sent to the editorial office. Selected book reviews are invited by the editor.
期刊最新文献
Evidence Basis for Psychodynamic Self-Psychology in Eating Disorders - A Review Paper. Perversion and the universal law. Does Individual Stigma Predict Mental Health Funding Attitudes? Toward an Understanding of Resource Allocation and Social Climate. Mental Illness Stigma Expressed by Police to Police. 'People with Problems, Not Patients with Illnesses': Using Psychosocial Frameworks to Reduce the Stigma of Psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1