In vitro comparison of cytotoxicity of four root canal sealers on human gingival fibroblasts.

Q2 Medicine Medicinski arhiv Pub Date : 2015-02-01 Epub Date: 2015-02-21 DOI:10.5455/medarh.2015.69.24-27
Alma Konjhodzic-Prcic, Selma Jakupovic, Lajla Hasic-Brankovic, Amra Vukovic
{"title":"In vitro comparison of cytotoxicity of four root canal sealers on human gingival fibroblasts.","authors":"Alma Konjhodzic-Prcic,&nbsp;Selma Jakupovic,&nbsp;Lajla Hasic-Brankovic,&nbsp;Amra Vukovic","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2015.69.24-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The goal of this in vitro study was to evaluate the relative biocompatibility of four endodontic sealers on the cell culture of the human fibroblast through cytotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study four endodontics sealers was used GuttaFlow (Roeko)silicone based sealer, AH plus (De Tray-DENTSPLY) epoxy resin based, Apexit (Vivadent) calcium hydroxide based and Endorez (Ultradent) methacrylate based sealer. Sealers were tested on primary cell lines of human gingival fibroblasts. Experiments were preformed in laboratories of Hacettepe University of Ankara, Turkey and Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Cytotoxicity was determinate using WST-1 assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results were analyzed by SPSS 19 program. Kolgomorov-Smirnov test, Shapiro-Wilk and descriptive statistics also were used, as well as Kriskall-Wallis, ANOVA test and T- test. According to our results all four sealers showed different cytotoxicity effects on human gingival fibroblast cell culture, but all of them are slightly cytotoxic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to results of this study it can be concluded: all four sealers showed different cytotoxicity effects on primary cell lines of human gingival fibroblasts, but all of them are slightly cytotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18421,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski arhiv","volume":"69 1","pages":"24-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/f7/MA-69-24.PMC4384855.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski arhiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2015.69.24-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Unlabelled: The goal of this in vitro study was to evaluate the relative biocompatibility of four endodontic sealers on the cell culture of the human fibroblast through cytotoxicity.

Materials and methods: In this study four endodontics sealers was used GuttaFlow (Roeko)silicone based sealer, AH plus (De Tray-DENTSPLY) epoxy resin based, Apexit (Vivadent) calcium hydroxide based and Endorez (Ultradent) methacrylate based sealer. Sealers were tested on primary cell lines of human gingival fibroblasts. Experiments were preformed in laboratories of Hacettepe University of Ankara, Turkey and Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Cytotoxicity was determinate using WST-1 assay.

Results: Results were analyzed by SPSS 19 program. Kolgomorov-Smirnov test, Shapiro-Wilk and descriptive statistics also were used, as well as Kriskall-Wallis, ANOVA test and T- test. According to our results all four sealers showed different cytotoxicity effects on human gingival fibroblast cell culture, but all of them are slightly cytotoxic.

Conclusions: According to results of this study it can be concluded: all four sealers showed different cytotoxicity effects on primary cell lines of human gingival fibroblasts, but all of them are slightly cytotoxicity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种根管封闭剂对人牙龈成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性比较。
未标记:本体外研究的目的是通过细胞毒性评估四种牙髓密封剂对人成纤维细胞培养的相对生物相容性。材料和方法:采用GuttaFlow (Roeko)有机硅基密封剂、AH plus (De Tray-DENTSPLY)环氧树脂基密封剂、Apexit (Vivadent)氢氧化钙基密封剂和Endorez (Ultradent)甲基丙烯酸酯基密封剂。封闭剂在人牙龈成纤维细胞原代细胞系上进行了实验。实验在土耳其安卡拉Hacettepe大学实验室和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那萨拉热窝大学牙科学院进行,采用WST-1法测定细胞毒性。结果:采用SPSS 19软件对结果进行分析。采用Kolgomorov-Smirnov检验、Shapiro-Wilk检验和描述性统计,以及Kriskall-Wallis检验、ANOVA检验和T检验。结果表明,四种封口剂对人牙龈成纤维细胞均有不同程度的细胞毒性,但均为轻微的细胞毒性。结论:根据本研究结果可以得出:四种封口剂对人牙龈成纤维细胞原代细胞系均有不同程度的细胞毒性作用,但均为轻微的细胞毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicinski arhiv
Medicinski arhiv Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Secretome of Hypoxia-Preconditioned Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Angiogenesis in Diabetic Rats with Peripheral Artery Disease. Perforated Stress Ulcer of the Duodenum: a Case of an Unexpected Diagnosis in a COVID-19 Patient Following Dilatation and Curettage Procedure. Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors. The Importance of Prediabetes Screening in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. The Correlation of Positive and Negative Symptoms (PANSS Scores) in Patients with Schizophrenia According to Gender.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1